Skip to main content

Nest and food search behaviour in desert ants, Cataglyphis: a critical comparison

Abstract

North African desert ants, Cataglyphis, use path integration to calculate a home vector during their foraging trips, constantly informing them about their position relative to the nest. This home vector is also used to find the way back to a productive feeding site the ant has encountered and thus memorized. When the animal fails to arrive at its goal after having run off the home or food vector, a systematic search is initiated. The basic search strategies are identical for nest and food searches, consisting of a search spiral superimposed by a random walk. While nest searches have been investigated in much detail, food site searches have received comparatively little attention. Here, we quantify and compare nest and food site searches recorded under similar conditions, particularly constant nest–feeder distance, and we observe notable differences in nest and food search performances. The parameters of nest searches are relatively constant and improve little with experience, although those small improvements had not been recognized previously. Food searches, by contrast, are more flexible and cover smaller or larger areas, mainly depending on the reliability of food encounter over several visits. Intriguingly, food site searches may be significantly more focussed than nest searches, although the nest should be the most important goal in an ant’s life. These results demonstrate both adaptability and high accuracy of the ants’ search programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Åkesson S, Wehner R (2002) Visual navigation in desert ants Cataglyphis fortis: are snapshots coupled to a celestial system of reference? J Exp Biol 205:1971–1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andel D, Wehner R (2004) Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis: how to make a homing ant run away from home. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:1485–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bisch-Knaden S, Wehner R (2003) Landmark memories are more robust when acquired at the nest site than en route: experiments in desert ants. Naturwissenschaften 90:127–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolek S, Wittlinger M, Wolf H (2012a) Establishing food site vectors in desert ants. J Exp Biol 215:653–656

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolek S, Wittlinger M, Wolf H (2012b) What counts for ants? How return behaviour and food search of Cataglyphis ants are modified by variations in food quantity and experience. J Exp Biol 215:3218–3222

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng K, Narendra A, Wehner R (2006) Behavioral ecology of odometric memories in desert ants: acquisition, retention, and integration. Behav Ecol 2:227–235

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng K, Narendra A, Sommer S, Wehner R (2009) Traveling in clutter: navigation in the Central Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. Behav Process 80:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Collett M, Collett T (2009) Local and global navigational coordinate systems in desert ants. J Exp Biol 212:901–905

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Collett M, Collett T, Wehner R (1999) Calibration of vector navigation in desert ants. Curr Biol 9:1031–1034

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fourcassié V, Traniello JFA (1993) Effects of experience on food-searching behavior in the ant Formica schaufussi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Insect Behav 6:287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fourcassié V, Coughlin D, Traniello JFA (1992) Fractal analysis of search behavior in ants. Naturwissenschaften 79:87–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Merkle T, Wehner R (2009) Repeated training does not improve the path integrator in desert ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Merkle T, Wehner R (2010) Desert ants use foraging distance to adapt the nest search to the uncertainty of the path integrator. Behav Ecol 21:349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Merkle T, Knaden M, Wehner R (2006) Uncertainty about nest position influences systematic search strategies in desert ants. J Exp Biol 209:3545–3549

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Müller M, Wehner R (1988) Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 85:5287–5290

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Müller M, Wehner R (1994) The hidden spiral: systematic search and path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Comp Physiol A 175:525–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Müller M, Wehner R (2010) Path integration provides a scaffold for landmark learning in desert ants. Curr Biol 20:1368–1371

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Narendra A (2007) Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti II. Interaction of the path integrator with visual cue information. J Exp Biol 10:1804–1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ronacher B (2008) Path integration as the basic navigation mechanism of the desert ant Cataglyphis fortis (Forel, 1902) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 11:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ronacher B, Wehner R (1995) Desert ants Cataglyphis fortis use self-induced optic flow to measure distances travelled. J Comp Physiol A 177:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmid-Hempel P (1984) Individually different foraging methods in the desert ant Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schultheiss P, Cheng K (2011) Finding the nest: inbound searching behaviour in the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Anim Behav 81:1031–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schultheiss P, Cheng K (2012) Finding food: outbound searching behavior in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. Behav Ecol 24:128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Seidl T, Wehner R (2006) Visual and tactile learning of ground structures in desert ants. J Exp Biol 209:3336–3344

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Srinivasan MV (2001) Animal behaviour: homing in on ant navigation. Nature 411:752–753

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Steck K, Hansson BS, Knaden M (2009) Smells like home: desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, use olfactory landmarks to pinpoint the nest. Front Zool 6:5. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-5

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wehner R (1982) Himmelsnavigation bei Insekten: Neurophysiologie und Verhalten. Neujahrsblatt Naturforsch Ges Zürich 184:1–132

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wehner R (1992) Arthropods. In: Papi F (ed) Animal homing. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 45–144

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Wehner R (2003) Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A 189:579–588

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wehner R (2009) The architecture of the desert ant’s navigational toolkit (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 12:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (1981) Searching behaviour of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J Comp Physiol A 142:315–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wehner R, Wehner S (1986) Path integration in desert ants. Approaching a long-standing puzzle in insect navigation. Monit Zool Ital 20:309–331

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wehner R, Wehner S (1990) Insect navigation: use of maps or Ariadne’s thread. Ethol Ecol Evol 2:27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wehner R, Harkness RD, Schmid-Hempel P (1983) Foraging strategies in individually searching ants, Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wehner R, Marsh AC, Wehner S (1992) Desert ants on a thermal tightrope. Nature 357:586–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wehner R, Gallizzi K, Frei C, Vesely M (2002) Calibration processes in desert ant navigation: vector courses and systematic search. J Comp Physiol A 188:338–683

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wehner R, Meier C, Zollikofer C (2004) The ontogeny of foraging behaviour in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor. Ecol Entomol 29:240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wittlinger M, Wolf H (2013) Homing distance in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, remains unaffected by disturbance of walking behaviour and visual input. J Exp Biol 210:198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wolf H (2008) Desert ants adjust their approach to a foraging site according to experience. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wolf H, Wehner R (2005) Desert ants compensate for navigation uncertainty. J Exp Biol 208:4223–4230

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wolf H, Wittlinger M, Bolek S (2012) Re-Visiting of plentiful food sources and food search strategies in desert ants. Front Neurosci 5(6):102. doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00102

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wystrach A, Schwarz S (2014) Ants use a predictive mechanism to compensate for passive displacements by wind. Curr Biol 23:1083–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kathrin Judith Schwannauer for precious help with the field experiments and Ursula Seifert for editing the text. Andrea Wirmer deserves special thanks for advice with statistical analyses. We are grateful to Ken Cheng and two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved the manuscript. Infrastructural support was provided by the University of Ulm. Financial support was provided for an initial part of this study by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WO466/9-1) and the Volkswagen-Stiftung (I 78 580) through Grants to HW. This work forms part of the Ph.D. dissertation by Sarah E. Pfeffer.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financially or otherwise.

Ethical standard

All experiments comply with the current laws in both Tunisia and Germany, particularly with regard to animal welfare.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah E. Pfeffer.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 504 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pfeffer, S.E., Bolek, S., Wolf, H. et al. Nest and food search behaviour in desert ants, Cataglyphis: a critical comparison. Anim Cogn 18, 885–894 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0858-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Desert ant Cataglyphis
  • Navigation
  • Systematic search
  • Food search
  • Nest search