Abstract-concept learning of difference in pigeons
- 290 Downloads
Many species have demonstrated the capacity to learn abstract concepts. Recent studies have shown that the quantity of stimuli used during training plays a critical role in how subjects learn abstract concepts. As the number of stimuli available in the training set increases, so too does performance on novel combinations. The role of set size has been explored with learning the concept of matching and same/different but not with learning the concept of difference. In the present study, pigeons were trained in a non-matching-to-sample task with an initial training set of three stimuli followed by transfer tests to novel stimuli. The training set was progressively doubled eight times with learning and transfer following each expansion. Transfer performance increased from chance level (50 %) at the smallest set size to a level equivalent to asymptotic training performance at the two largest training set sizes (384, 768). This progressive novel-stimulus transfer function of a non-matching (difference) rule is discussed in comparison with results from a similar experiment where pigeons were trained on a matching rule.
KeywordsNon-matching Oddity-from-sample Matching-to-sample Set-size expansion Abstract-concept learning
We wish to thank Adam M. Goodman, John F. Magnotti, Andrea M. Thompkins, and Kent D. Bodily for their careful assistance in conducting this experiment. Portions of this experiment were used in Thomas A. Daniel’s Masters Thesis.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This experiment complied with current US law and following the relevant ethical guidelines for animal research (IACUC approved and conducted in AAALAC approved facilities).
- Bukatko D, Daehler MW (2011) Child development: a thematic approach. Wadsworth Publishing Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Lazareva OF, Wasserman EA (2010) Category learning and concept learning in birds. In: Mareschal D, Quinn PC, Lea SE (eds) The making of human concepts. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Piaget J, Inhelder B (1969) The psychology of the child (trans: Weaver H). Basic Books, New York (Original work published 1966)Google Scholar
- Premack D (1978) On the abstractness of human concepts: why it would be difficult to talk to a pigeon. In: Hulse SH, Fowler H, Honig WK (eds) Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Erlbuam, Hillsdale, pp 423–451Google Scholar
- Thompson RKR (1995) Natural and relational concepts in animals. In: Roitblat H, Meyer JA (eds) Comparative approaches to cognitive science. Bradford, MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar