Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

No evidence for memory interference across sessions in food hoarding marsh tits Poecile palustris under laboratory conditions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scatter hoarding birds are known for their accurate spatial memory. In a previous experiment, we tested the retrieval accuracy in marsh tits in a typical laboratory set-up for this species. We also tested the performance of humans in this experimental set-up. Somewhat unexpectedly, humans performed much better than marsh tits. In the first five attempts, humans relocated almost 90 % of the caches they had hidden 5 h earlier. Marsh tits only relocated 25 % in the first five attempts and just above 40 % in the first ten attempts. Typically, in this type of experiment, the birds will be caching and retrieving many times in the same sites in the same experimental room. This is very different from the conditions in nature where hoarding parids only cache once in a caching site. Hence, it is possible that memories from previous sessions will disturb the formation of new memories. If there is such proactive interference, the prediction is that success should decay over sessions. Here, we have designed an experiment to investigate whether there is such memory interference in this type of experiment. We allowed marsh tits and humans to cache and retrieve in three repeated sessions without prior experience of the arena. The performance did not change over sessions, and on average, marsh tits correctly visited around 25 % of the caches in the first five attempts. The corresponding success in humans was constant across sessions, and it was around 90 % on average. We conclude that the somewhat poor performance of the marsh tits did not depend on proactive memory interference. We also discuss other possible reasons for why marsh tits in general do not perform better in laboratory experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M, Krebs JR (1978) On the evolution of hoarding behaviour. Anim Behav 26:707–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balda RP, Kamil AC (1992) Long-term spatial memory in Clark’s nutcracker, (Nucifraga columbiana). Anim Behav 44:761–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednekoff PA, Balda RP, Kamil AC, Hile AG (1997) Long-term spatial memory in four seed-caching corvid species. Anim Behav 53:335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck DR, Burack OR, Shettleworth SJ (1992) One-trial associative memory in black-capped chickadees. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 18:12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodin A (1992) Cache dispersion affects retrieval time in hoarding willow tits. Ornis Scand 23:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodin A (1994) Separation of caches between individual willow tits hoarding under natural conditions. Anim Behav 47:1031–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodin A (2005) Hippocampal volume does not correlate with food-hoarding rates in the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) and willow tit (Parus montanus). Auk 122:819–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodin A, Ekman J (1994) Benefits of food hoarding. Nature 372:510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brodin A, Kunz C (1997) An experimental study of cache recovery by hoarding willow tits after different retention intervals. Behaviour 134:881–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodin A, Urhan AU (2013) An evaluation of memory accuracy in food hoarding marsh tits Poecile palustris—how accurate are they compared to humans? Behav Process 97:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodin A, Urhan AU (2014) Interspecific observational memory in a non-caching Parus species, the great tit Parus major. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:649–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton NS (1993) Lateralization and unilateral transfer of spatial memory in marsh tits. J Comp Physiol A 171:799–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton NS (1998) Memory and the hippocampus in food-storing birds: a comparative approach. Neuropharmacology 37:441–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994) One-trial associative memory: comparison of food-storing and nonstoring species of birds. Anim Learn Behav 22:366–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie RJ, Krebs JR, Sherry DF (1981) Food storing by marsh tits. Anim Behav 29:1252–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1989) Ecology of non-breeding social systems of Parus. Wilson Bull 101:263–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftorn S (1956) Contribution to the food biology of tits especially about storing of surplus food. Part IV. A comparative analysis of Parus atricapillus L., P. cristatus L. and P. ater L. Kgl Norske Vidensk Selsk Skr 4:1–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftorn S (1959) The proportion of spruce seeds removed by the tits in a Norwegian spruce forest in 1954–55. Kgl Norske Vidensk Selsk Forh 32:121–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy SD, Suhonen J (1996) Memory for locations of stored food in willow tits and marsh tits. Behaviour 133:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herz RS, Zanette L, Sherry DF (1994) Spatial cues for cache retrieval by black-capped chickadees. Anim Behav 48:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock CL, Sherry DF (1990) Long-term memory for cache sites in the black-capped chickadee. Anim Behav 40:701–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Sherry DF, Healy SD, Perry VH, Vaccarino AL (1989) Hippocampal specialization of food-storing birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:1388–1392

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krushinskaya N (1966) Some complex forms of feeding behaviour of nutcracker Nucifraga caryocatactes, after removal of old cortex. Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol 11:563–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JL, Kamil AC, Webbink KE (2013) Changing room cues reduces the effects of proactive interference in Clark’s Nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 39:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas JR, Brodin A, de Kort SR, Clayton NS (2004) Does hippocampal size correlate with the degree of caching specialization? Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2423–2429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pravosudov VV (1986) Individual differences in the behavior of the Siberian tit (Parus cinctus Bodd.) and the willow tit (Parus montanus Bald.) in foraging and storing food. Sov J Ecol 4:60–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Pravosudov VV, Clayton NS (2001) Effects of demanding foraging conditions on cache retrieval accuracy in food-caching mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). Proc R Soc Lond B 268:363–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth TC, LaDage LD, Pravosudov VV (2012) Evidence for long-term spatial memory in a parid. Anim Cogn 15:149–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry DF, Krebs JR, Cowie RJ (1981) Memory for the location of stored food in marsh tits. Anim Behav 29:1260–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry DF, Avery M, Stevens A (1982) The spacing of stored food by marsh tits. Z Tierpsychol 58:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry DF, Vaccarino AL, Buckenham K, Herz RS (1989) The hippocampal complex of food-storing birds. Brain Behav Evol 34:308–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (1990) Spatial memory in food-storing birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 329:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ, Krebs JR (1982) How marsh tits find their hoards: the roles of site preference and spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 8:354–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ, Krebs JR (1986) Stored and encountered seeds: a comparison of two spatial memory tasks in marsh tits and chickadees. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 12:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens T, Krebs JR (1986) Retrieval of stored seeds by marsh tits Parus palustris in the field. Ibis 128:513–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanberg PO (1951) Food storage, territory and song in the thick-billed nutcracker. In: Hörstadius S (ed) Proc10th Internat Ornithol Congr. 1950, Uppsala. Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala, pp 545–554

  • Tomback DF (1980) How nutcrackers find their stores. Condor 82:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall S (1982) An experimental analysis of cache recovery in Clark’s nutcracker. Anim Behav 30:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB, Balda RP (1978) Co-adaptations of the Clark’s nutcracker and the piñon pine for efficient seed harvest and dispersal. Ecol Monogr 47:89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Lund University, Ecology Building, 223 62, Lund, Sweden

    A. Utku Urhan & Anders Brodin

Authors
  1. A. Utku Urhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anders Brodin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Utku Urhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urhan, A.U., Brodin, A. No evidence for memory interference across sessions in food hoarding marsh tits Poecile palustris under laboratory conditions. Anim Cogn 18, 649–656 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0833-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0833-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation