Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 463–471 | Cite as

Something worth remembering: visual discrimination in sharks

  • Theodora FussEmail author
  • Vera Schluessel
Original Paper

Abstract

This study investigated memory retention capabilities of juvenile gray bamboo sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) using two-alternative forced-choice experiments. The sharks had previously been trained in a range of visual discrimination tasks, such as distinguishing between squares, triangles and lines, and their corresponding optical illusions (i.e., the Kanizsa figures or Müller–Lyer illusions), and in the present study, we tested them for memory retention. Despite the absence of reinforcement, sharks remembered the learned information for a period of up to 50 weeks, after which testing was terminated. In fish, as in other vertebrates, memory windows vary in duration depending on species and task; while it may seem beneficial to retain some information for a long time or even indefinitely, other information may be forgotten more easily to retain flexibility and save energy. The results of this study indicate that sharks are capable of long-term memory within the framework of selected cognitive skills. These could aid sharks in activities such as food retrieval, predator avoidance, mate choice or habitat selection and therefore be worth being remembered for extended periods of time. As in other cognitive tasks, intraspecific differences reflected the behavioral breadth of the species.

Keywords

Elasmobranch Chiloscyllium griseum Visual memory Memory retention Visual discrimination Optical illusion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Slawa Braun for animal caretaking, maintenance and repairs. We are specifically grateful to the ‘Haus des Meeres’ in Vienna for supplying the animals used during this study. The research reported herein was performed under the guidelines established by the current German animal protection law.

References

  1. Aronson LR (1951) Orientation and jumping behavior in the gobiid fish Bathygobius soporator. Am Mus Nov 1486:1–22Google Scholar
  2. Aronson LR (1971) Further studies on orientation and jumping behavior in the gobiid fish, Bathygobius soporator. Ann N Y Acad Sci 188:378–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb13110.x
  3. Berryhill ME, Olson IR (2008) The right parietal lobe is critical for visual working memory. Neuropsychologia 46(7):1767–1774PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beukema JJ (1970) Angling experiments with carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). II: decreasing catchability through one-trial learning. Neth J Zool 20:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown C (2001) Familiarity with the test environment improves the escape responses in the crimson spotted rainbow fish, Melanotaenia duboulayi. Anim Cogn 4:109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown C, Gardner C, Braithwaite VA (2004) Population variation in lateralised eye use in the poeciliid Brachyraphis episcopi. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S455–S457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryan JE, Larkin PA (1972) Food specialization by individual trout. J Bull Fish Res Board Can 29:1615–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bshary R, Wickler W, Fricke H (2002) Fish cognition: a primate’s eye view. Anim Cogn 5:1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns JG, Foucaud J, Mery F (2011) Costs of memory: lessons from ‘mini’ brains. Proc R Soc B 278:923–929PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chittka L, Niven J (2009) Are bigger brains better? Curr Biol 19(21):R995–R1008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark E (1959) Instrumental conditioning of lemon sharks. Science 130:217–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clayton NA, Krebs JA (1994) Memory for spatial and object-specific cues in food-storing and non-storing birds. J Comp Physiol A 174:371–379Google Scholar
  13. Croy MI, Hughes RN (1991) The role of learning and memory in the feeding behavior of the fifteen-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia L. Anim Behav 41:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Csányi V, Csizmadia G, Miklósi Á (1989) Long-term memory and recognition of another species in the paradise fish. Anim Behav 37:908–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cuthill IC, Kacelnik A, Krebs JR, Haccou P, Iwasa Y (1990) Starlings exploiting patches: the effect of recent experience on foraging decisions. Anim Behav 40:625–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis KM, Burghardt GM (2012) Long-term retention of visual tasks by two species of emydid turtles, Pseudemys nelsoni and Trachemys scripta. J Comp Pyschol 126(3):213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Haan EHF, Appels B, Aleman A, Postma A (2000) Inter- and intramodal encoding of auditory and visual presentation of material: effects on memory performance. Psychol Rec 50:577–586Google Scholar
  18. Dudai Y (1989) The neurobiology of memory: concepts, findings, trends. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Dugatkin LA, Wilson DS (1992) The prerequisites for strategic behavior in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. Anim Behav 44:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dukas R (1999) Costs of memory: ideas and predictions. J Theor Biol 197(1):41–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fricke H (1974) Öko-Ethologie des monogamen Anemonenfisches Amphiprion bicinctus. Z Tierpsychol 36:429–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fukumori K, Okuda N, Yamaoka K, Yanagisawa Y (2009) Remarkable spatial memory in a migratory cardinalfish. Anim Cogn 13:385–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuss T, Bleckmann H, Schluessel V (2014a) Visual discrimination abilities in the gray bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium griseum). Zoology 17(2):104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuss T, Bleckmann H, Schluessel V (2014b) The brain creates illusions not just for us: sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) can see the magic as well. Front Neural Circuits 8:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fuster JM (1995) Memory in the cerebral cortex. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (1998) How many flower types can bumblebees forage on at the same time? Can J Zool 76(7):1358–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goelet P, Castellucci VF, Schacher S, Kandel ER (1986) The long and the short of long-term memory—a molecular framework. Nature 322:419–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldsmith M (1914) Les reactions physiologiques et psychiques des poissons. Bull Inst Gén Psychol 14:97–228Google Scholar
  29. Goulson D, Stout JC, Hawson SA (1997) Can flower constancy in nectaring butterflies be explained by Darwin’s interference hypothesis? Oecologia 112:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guttridge TL, Brown C (2014) Learning and memory in the Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni. Anim Cogn 17(2):415–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hampton RR, Shettleworth S (1996) Hippocampal lesions impair memory for location but not color in passerine birds. Behav Neurosci 110:831–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kamil AC, Balda RP (1985) Cache recovery and spatial memory in Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). J Exp Psychol Anim B 11(1):95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kamil AC, Balda RP (1990) Spatial memory in seed-caching corvids. Psychol Learn Motiv 26:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelley CR (1969) What is adaptive training? Hum Factors 11(6):547–556Google Scholar
  35. Kimber J, Sims D, Bellamy P, Gill AB (2014) Elasmobranch cognitive ability: using electroreceptive foraging behaviour to demonstrate learning, habituation and memory in a benthic shark. Anim Cogn 17(1):55–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kraemer PJ, Golding JM (1997) Adaptive forgetting in animals. Psychon Bull Rev 4:480–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis CA (1986) Memory constraints and flower choice in Pieris rapae. Science 232:863–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mackney PA, Hughes RN (1995) Foraging behaviour and memory window in sticklebacks. Behaviour 132:1231–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahut H, Zola-Morgan S, Moss M (1982) Hippocampal resections impair associative learning and recognition memory in the monkey. J Neurosci 2:1214–1229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. McClelland JL, McNaughton BL, O’Reilly RC (1995) Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol Rev 102:419–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mishkin M (1978) Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not by separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus. Nature 273:297–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murray EA, Mishkin M (1984) Severe tactual as well as visual memory deficits follow combined removal of the amygdala and hippocampus in monkeys. J Neurosci 4:2565–2580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Nilsson J, Kristiansen TS, Fosseidengen JE, Ferno A, van den Bos R (2008a) Learning in cod (Gadus morhua): long trace interval retention. Anim Cogn 11:215–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nilsson J, Kristiansen TS, Fosseidengen JE, Fernö A, van den Bos R (2008b) Sign- and goal-tracking in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Anim Cogn 11(4):651–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nilsson J, Kristiansen TS, Fosseidengen JE, Stien LH, Ferno A, van den Bos R (2010) Learning and anticipatory behaviour in a “sit-and-wait” predator: the Atlantic halibut. Behav Process 83(3):257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Odling-Smee L, Braithwaite VA (2003) The influence of habitat stability on landmark use during spatial learning in the three-spined stickleback. Anim Behav 65:701–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Odling-Smee LC, Boughman JW, Braithwaite VA (2008) Sympatric species of three-spined stickleback differ in their performance in a spatial learning task. Behav Ecol Sciobiol 62:1935–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saigusa T, Tero A, Nakagaki T, Kuramoto Y (2008) Amoebae anticipate periodic events. Phys Rev Lett 100:018101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schluessel V, Bleckmann H (2012) Spatial learning and memory retention in the grey bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium griseum). Zoology 115(6):346–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneiders JA, Opitz B, Krick CM, Mecklinger A (2011) Separating intra-modal and across-modal training effects in visual working memory: an fMRI investigation. Cereb Cortex 21:2555–2564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shapiro ML, Olton DS (1994) Hippocampal function and interference. In: Schacter DL, Tulving E (eds) Memory systems 1994. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Spear EN, Riccio DC (1994) Memory: phenomena and principles. Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  53. Squire LR, Zola-Morgan S (1985) The neuropsychology of memory: new links between humans and experimental animals. In: Olton DS, Gamzu E, Corkin S (eds) Memory dysfunctions: an integration of animal and human research from preclinical and clinical perspectives. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York: New York Academy of Sciences 444: 137–149Google Scholar
  54. Stanton ML (1983) Short-term learning and the searching accuracy of egg-laying butterflies. Anim Behav 31:33–40Google Scholar
  55. Tarrant RM (1964) Rate of extinction of a conditional response in juvenile sockeye salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 93:399–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tlusty MF, Andrew J, Baldwin K, Bradley TM (2008) Acoustic conditioning for recall/recapture of scaped Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout. Aquaculture 274:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tully T (1996) Discovery of genes involved with learning and memory: an experimental synthesis of Hirschian and Benzerian perspectives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:13460–13467PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Warburton K (2003) Learning of foraging skills by fish. Fish Fish 4:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ware DM (1971) Predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): the effect of experience. J Fish Res Board Can 28:1847–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. White KG (2001) Forgetting functions. Anim Learn Behav 29:193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Woodward G, Laverty TM (1992) Recall of flower handling skills by bumble bees: a test of Darwin’s interference hypothesis. Anim Behav 44:1045–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zion B, Barki A, Grinshpon J, Rosenfeld L, Karplus I (2011) Retention of acoustic conditioning in St. Peter’s fish Sarotherodon galilaeus. J Fish Biol 78(3):838–847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zola-Morgan S, Squire L, Alvarez-Royo P, Clower RP, Morgan-Zola S (1991) Independence of memory functions and emotional behavior: separate contributions of the hippocampal formation and the amygdala. Hippocampus 1(2):207–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of ZoologyRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations