Animal Cognition

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 1281–1288 | Cite as

Pilfering Eurasian jays use visual and acoustic information to locate caches

  • Rachael C. ShawEmail author
  • Nicola S. Clayton
Original Paper


Pilfering corvids use observational spatial memory to accurately locate caches that they have seen another individual make. Accordingly, many corvid cache-protection strategies limit the transfer of visual information to potential thieves. Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius) employ strategies that reduce the amount of visual and auditory information that is available to competitors. Here, we test whether or not the jays recall and use both visual and auditory information when pilfering other birds’ caches. When jays had no visual or acoustic information about cache locations, the proportion of available caches that they found did not differ from the proportion expected if jays were searching at random. By contrast, after observing and listening to a conspecific caching in gravel or sand, jays located a greater proportion of caches, searched more frequently in the correct substrate type and searched in fewer empty locations to find the first cache than expected. After only listening to caching in gravel and sand, jays also found a larger proportion of caches and searched in the substrate type where they had heard caching take place more frequently than expected. These experiments demonstrate that Eurasian jays possess observational spatial memory and indicate that pilfering jays may gain information about cache location merely by listening to caching. This is the first evidence that a corvid may use recalled acoustic information to locate and pilfer caches.


Corvid Garrulus glandarius Observational spatial memory Auditory information Pilfering 



The work was supported by grants to NSC from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, the Royal Society, and the University of Cambridge. RCS was funded by a Cambridge-Rutherford Memorial Scholarship from the Royal Society of New Zealand and the Cambridge Commonwealth Trusts. We thank Patricia Marques for assistance with interobserver reliability, Tim Clutton-Brock, Lisa Leaver, Lucy Cheke and Edward Legg for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript, Ljerka Ostojić for discussion and Ivan Vakrilov and Charmaine Donovan for avian husbandry.

Ethical standard

The experiments were conducted under the UK Home Office project licences PPL 80/1975 and PPL 80/2519.

Supplementary material

10071_2014_763_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (67 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 67 kb)
10071_2014_763_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (78 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 77 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MPG 17541 kb)


  1. Andrén H (1990) Despotic distribution, unequal reproductive success, and population regulation in the jay Garrulus glandarius L. Ecology 71:1796–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ et al (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bugnyar T, Kotrschal K (2002) Observational learning and the raiding of food caches in ravens, Corvus corax: is it “tactical” deception? Anim Behav 64:185–195. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2002.3056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dally JM, Clayton NS, Emery NJ (2006) The behaviour and evolution of cache protection and pilferage. Anim Behav 72:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feenders G, Smulders TV (2011) Magpies can use local cues to retrieve their food caches. Anim Cogn 14:235–243. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0357-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hitchcock CL, Sherry DF (1990) Long-term memory for cache sites in the black-capped chickadee. Anim Behav 40:701–712. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80699-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mundry R, Fischer J (1998) Use of statistical programs for nonparametric tests of small samples often leads to incorrect P-values: examples from Animal Behaviour. Anim Behav 56:256–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shaw RC, Clayton NS (2012) Eurasian jays, Garrulus glandarius, flexibly switch caching and pilfering tactics in response to social context. Anim Behav 84:1191–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shaw RC, Clayton NS (2013) Careful cachers and prying pilferers: Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius) limit auditory information available to competitors. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20122238. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Spetch M (1987) Systematic errors in pigeons’ memory for event duration: interaction between training and test delay. Anim Learn Behav 15:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stulp G, Emery NJ, Verhulst S, Clayton NS (2009) Western scrub-jays conceal auditory information when competitors can hear but cannot see. Biol Lett 5:583–585. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0330 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Watanabe S, Clayton NS (2007) Observational visuospatial encoding of the cache locations of others by western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica). J Ethol 25:271–279. doi: 10.1007/s10164-006-0023-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Comparative Cognition Group, Department of PsychologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations