Problem solving by worker bumblebees Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)

Abstract

During foraging, worker bumblebees are challenged by simple to complex tasks. Our goal was to determine whether bumblebees could successfully accomplish tasks that are more complex than those they would naturally encounter. Once the initial training to successfully manipulate a simple, artificial flower was completed, the bees were either challenged with a series of increasingly difficult tasks or with the most difficult task without the opportunity for prior learning. The first experiment demonstrated that the bees learned to slide or lift caps that prevented their access to the reinforcer sugar solution through a series of tasks with increasing complexity: moving one cap either to the right or to the left, or lifting it up. The second experiment demonstrated that the bees learned to push balls of escalating masses (diameters 1 and 1.27 cm) from the access to the hidden rewarding (sugar syrup) reservoir of artificial flowers. In both experiments, when bees with experience with only the simplest task (i.e. an artificial flower without a barrier to the reinforcer) were presented next with the most complex or difficult task, they failed. Only by proceeding through the series of increasingly difficult tasks were they able to succeed at the most difficult. We also noted idiosyncratic behaviours by individual bees in learning to succeed. Our results can be interpreted within the context of Skinnerian shaping and possibly scaffold learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Alston DG, Tepedino VJ, Bradley BA et al (2007) Effects of the insecticide phosmet on solitary bee foraging and nesting in orchards of Capitol Reef National Park, Utah. Environ Entomol 36:811–816

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amaya Marquez M (2009) Memory and learning in bees’ floral choices (Memoria y aprendizaje en la escogencia floral de las abejas). Acta Biol Colombiana 14:125–135

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amaya-Marquez M, Hill PSM, Barthell JF et al (2008) Learning and memory during foraging of the blue orchard bee, Osmia lignaria say (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 81:315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barth FG (1985) Insects and flowers: the biology of a partnership. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bransford J, Brown A, Cocking R (2000) How people learn: mind, brain, experience and school. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chance P (1999) Thorndike’s puzzle boxes and the origins of the experimental analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 72:433–440. doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.72-433

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chittka L (1998) Sensorimotor learning in bumblebees: long-term retention and reversal training. J Exp Biol 201:515–524

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chittka L, Thomson JD (2001) Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behaviour and floral evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Collett TS, Fry SN, Wehner R (1993) Sequence learning by honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 172:693–706

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (1995) Effect of flower complexity on relearning flower-handling skills in bumble bees. Can J Zool 73:2052–2058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (1998) How many flower types can bumblebees work at the same time? Can J Zool 76:1358–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (2005) Flower constancy in bumble bees: a test of the trait variability hypothesis. Anim Behav 69:939–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gill RJ, Ramos-Rodriguez O, Raine NE (2012) Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees. Nature 491:105–108

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heinrich B (1976) Foraging specializations of individual bumblebees. Ecol Monogr 46:105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heinrich B (1979) “Majoring” and “minoring” by foraging bumblebees: Bombus vagans; an experimental study. Ecology 60:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kevan PG, Manzel R (2012) The plight of pollination and the interface of neurobiology, ecology and food security. Environmentalist 32:300–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laverty TM (1980) The flower visiting behaviour of bumblebee: floral complexity and learning. Can J Zool 58:1324–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laverty TM (1994) Bumblebee and flower morphology. Anim Behav 47:531–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Laverty TM, Plowright CR (1988) Flower handling by bumblebees: a comparison of specialists and generalists. Anim Behav 36:733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lavertyt M (1978) Flower-visiting behaviour of experienced and inexperienced bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, M.Sc

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mirwan HB, Kevan PG (2013) Social learning in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens): worker bumblebees learn to manipulate and forage at artificial flowers by observation and communication within the colony. Psyche 2013:1–8. doi:10.1155/2013/768108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Muller H, Chittka L (2012) Consistent interindividual differences in discrimination performance by bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus terrestris) in colour, shape and odour learning tasks. Entomol Gen 34:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olson J, Platt J (2000) The instructional cycle. Teaching children and adolescents with special needs. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River, pp 170–197

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pankiw T, Page RE Jr (1999) The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging and behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol 185:207–213

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raine NE, Chittka L (2012) No trade-off between learning speed and associative flexibility in bumble bees: a reversal learning test with multiple colonies. PLoS ONE 7(9):e45096. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045096

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Raine NE, Ings TC, Ramos-Rodríguez O, Chittka L (2006) Intercolony variation in learning performance of a wild British bumble bee population (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus terrestris audax). Entomol Gen 28:241–256

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ray S, Ferneyhough B (1997) The effects of age on olfactory learning and memory in the honey bee Apis mellifera. Neuro Report J 8:789–793

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sawyer KR (2006) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Skinner BF (1953) Science and human behavior. Macmillan, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson HM (2003) Behavioural effects of pesticides in bees—their potential for use in risk assessment. Ecotoxicol 12:317–330

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vygotsky LS (1987) Thinking and speech. In Vygotsky LS, Collected works (1: pp. 39–285) (R. Rieber & A. Carton, Eds; N. Minick, Trans). New York: Plenum. (Original works published in 1934, 1960)

  33. Woodward GL, Laverty TM (1992) Recall of flower handling skills by bumble bees: a test of Darwin’s interference hypothesis. Anim Behav 44:1041–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang SW, Bartsch K, Srinivasan MV (1996) Maze learning by honeybees. Neurobiol Learn Mem 66:267–282

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang SW, Lehrer M, Srinivasan MV (1998) Stimulus—conditioned sequence learning in honeybees. In: Proceedings of the 26th Göttingen Neurobiology Conference 1998 (eds Elsner N and Wehner R), 2: 519. Stuttgart: Thieme

  36. Zhang S, Mizutani A, Srinivasan MV (2000) Maze navigation by honeybees: learning path regularity. Learn Mem 7:363–374

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Canadian Pollination Initiative (NSERC-CANPOLIN) for funding some of this research reported. This contribution is No.110 from NSERC-CANPOLIN. HM thanks the Libyan Ministry of Education and Canadian Bureau for International Students for scholarships received. BioBest Biological Systems, Leamington, Ontario kindly provided colonies of the test subjects. We are especially grateful to Dr. Francesco Leri, Psychology Department of the University of Guelph for his critical review and help in preparing this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamida B. Mirwan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirwan, H.B., Kevan, P.G. Problem solving by worker bumblebees Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Anim Cogn 17, 1053–1061 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0737-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bumblebee
  • Bee
  • Apidae
  • Bombus
  • Learning
  • Cognition
  • Behaviour
  • Scaffold learning
  • Skinnerian shaping