Skip to main content

Human–Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus) reciprocity: a follow-up study

An Erratum to this article was published on 25 February 2014

Abstract

In a previous study (Péron et al. in Anim Cogn, doi:10.1007/s10071-012.05640, 2012), Grey parrots, working in dyads, took turns choosing one of four differently coloured cups with differing outcomes: empty (null, non-rewarding), selfish (keeping reward for oneself), share (sharing a divisible reward), or giving (donating reward to other). When the dyads involved three humans with different specific intentions (selfish, giving, or copying the bird’s behaviour), birds’ responses only tended towards consistency with human behaviour. Our dominant bird was willing to share a reward with a human who was willing to give up her reward, was selfish with the selfish human, and tended towards sharing with the copycat human; our subordinate bird tended slightly towards increased sharing with the generous human and selfishness with the selfish human, but did not clearly mirror the behaviour of the copycat. We theorized that the birds’ inability to understand the copycat condition fully—that they could potentially maximize reward by choosing to share—was a consequence of their viewing the copycat’s behaviour as erratic compared with the consistently selfish or giving humans and thus not realizing that they were indeed being mirrored. We suggested that copycat trials subsequently be performed as a separate experiment, without being contrasted with trials in which humans acted consistently, in order to determine if results might have differed. We have now performed that experiment, and shown that at least one Grey parrot—our dominant—responded in a manner suggesting that he deduced the appropriate contingencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen ST, Berntson GG, Hannan MB, Cacioppo JT (1996) Quantity-based interference and symbolic representations in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Expt’l Psych: Anim Behav Proc 22:76–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart JM, van Schaik C (2012) Group service in macaques (Maccaca fuscata), capuchins (Cebus paella) and marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): A comparative approach to identifying proactive prosocial motivations. J Comp Psychol. doi:10.1037/a0026392

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin KA, Snowdon CT (2008) The effects of unequal reward distributions on cooperative problem solving by cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus. Anim Behav 75:245–257. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.032

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Lascio F, Neffleler F, Bshary R, Bugnyar T (2013) Ravens (Corvus corax) are indifferent to the gains of conspecific recipients or human partners in experimental tasks. Anim Cogn 16:35–43. doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0548-0

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery NJ (2004) Are corvids ‘feathered apes’? Cognitive evolution in crows, jays, rooks and jackdaws. In: Watanabe S (ed) Comparative analysis of minds. Keio University Press, Tokyo, pp 181–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Giret N, Miklósi A, Kreutzer M, Bovet D (2009) Use of experimenter-given cues by African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Anim Cogn 12:1–10

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant A, Dutton J (2012) Beneficiary or benefactor: are people more prosocial when they reflect on receiving or giving? Psych Sci 23:1033–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner V, Carter JD, Suchak M, de Waal FBM (2011) Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees. PNAS 108:13847–13851

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krams I, Krama T, Igaune K, Mänd R (2008) Experimental evidence of reciprocal altruism in the pied flycatcher. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May DL (2004) The vocal repertoire of Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) living in the Congo Basin. PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

  • Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006) Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science 311:1297–1300

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1981) Functional vocalizations by an African Grey parrot. Z Tierpsychol 55:139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1990) Cognition in an African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): further evidence for comprehension of categories and labels. J Comp Psychol 104:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1999) The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of Grey parrots. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (2004) “Insightful” string-pulling in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) is affected by vocal competence. Anim Cogn 7:263–266

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Shive HA (2001) Simultaneous development of vocal and physical object combinations by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): bottle caps, lids, and labels. J Comp Psychol 115:376–384

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Wilcox SE (2000) Evidence for a form of mutual exclusivity during label acquisition by Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus)? J Comp Psychol 114:219–231

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Wilkes SR (2004) Lack of referential vocal learning from LCD video by Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Interact Stud 5:75–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Willner MR, Gravitz LB (1997) Development of Piagetian object permanence in a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 111:63–75

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Naughton JR, Banta PA (1998) Allospecific vocal learning by Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus): a failure of videotaped instruction under certain conditions. Behav Process 42:139–158

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Gardiner LI, Luttrell LJ (1999) Limited contextual vocal learning in the Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): the effect of co-viewers on videotaped instruction. J Comp Psychol 113:158–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Sandefer RM, Noel D, Ellsworth CP (2000) Vocal learning in the Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): effect of species identity and number of trainers. J Comp Psychol 114:371–380

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Koepke A, Livingston P, Girard M, Hartsfield LA (2012) Reasoning by inference: further studies on exclusion in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol. doi:10.1037/a0031641

    Google Scholar 

  • Péron F, Johns M, Sapowicz S, Bovet D, Pepperberg IM (2012) A study of reciprocity in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-012.05640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rivas J (2013) Cooperation, imitation and partial matching. Games Econ Behav 79:148–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutte C, Taborsky M (2008) The influence of social experience on cooperative behaviour of rats (Rattus norvegicus): direct versus generalized reciprocity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:499–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheid C, Schmidt J, Noë R (2008) Distinct patterns of food offering and co-feeding in rooks. Anim Behav 76:1701–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab C, Swoboda R, Kotrschal K, Bugnyar T (2012) Recipients affect prosocial and altruistic choices in jackdaws, Corvus monedula. PLOS One 7(4):e34922. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034922

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed AM, Clayton NS, Emery NJ (2008) Cooperative problem solving in rooks (Corvus frugilegus). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275:1421–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silk JB, House BR (2011) Evolutionary foundations of human prosocial sentiments. PNAS 108:10910–10917

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder NF, Wiley JW, Kepler CB (1987) The parrots of Luquillo: natural history and conservation of the Puerto Rican parrot. Western Foundation for Vertebrate Zoology, Los Angeles, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Triana E, Pasnak R (1981) Object permanence in cats and dogs. Anim Learn Behav 9:135–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart Rev Biol 46:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bos W, van Dijk E, Westenberg M, Rombouts SARB, Crone EA (2011) Changing brains, changing perspectives: the neurocognitive development of reciprocity. Psych Sci 22:60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bayern AMP, de Kort SR, Clayton NS, Emery NJ (2007) The role of food- and object-sharing in the development of social bonds in juvenile jackdaws (Corvus monedula). Behaviour 144:711–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken F, Hare B, Melis AP, Hanus D, Tomasello M (2007) Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biol 5:e184. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050184

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto S, Takimoto A (2012) Empathy and fairness: psychological mechanisms for eliciting and maintaining prosociality and cooperation in primates. Soc Just Res 25:233–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita C (1987) Field observations and comments on the Indigo macaw (Anodorhynchus leari), a highly endangered species from northeastern Brazil. Wilson Bull 99:280–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (2004) The details of food-sharing interactions—their cost in social prestige. Behav Brain Sci 27:570–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thornburg was supported by the Harvard College Research Program. Pepperberg, Gross, and Gray were supported in part by donors to The Alex Foundation (particularly the Anders Sterner family, Marc Haas Foundation, Anita Keefe, Janice Boyd, Alex and Michael Shuman, Nancy Sondow, Nancy Chambers, the Howard Bayne Fund, Kathryn and Walter McAdams, Grey Parrot Studios, Katie Dolan, the Raleigh-Durham Caged Bird Society, Joseph Golden, Pat Hill, Elva and Bob Mathiesen, the Platinum Parrot, Jan and Jeff Strong, the Oklahoma Avicultural Society, Bill Broach, Nancy Clark, Deborah Rivel Goodale/Wildtones, The Robert D. Goodale Fund (via the Indian River Community Foundation), Patti DeMar Hauver, Roni Duke, Don and Grace Wheeler). We thank Maryam Vaziri Pashkam for advice with statistical analyses, Jonathan Richie for assistance with some trials, Harrison’s Bird Food and Fowl Play for foods and treats, Bird Paradise for Griffin’s cage, and Carol D’Arezzo for Griffin’s stand. The study procedures comply with the current laws of the USA, where they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene M. Pepperberg.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0736-1.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 7183 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 26408 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Péron, F., Thornberg, L., Gross, B. et al. Human–Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus) reciprocity: a follow-up study. Anim Cogn 17, 937–944 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0726-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0726-3

Keywords

  • Grey parrot cognition
  • Reciprocity
  • Non-human sharing
  • Psittacus erithacus