Abstract
When humans mentally reconstruct past events and imagine future scenarios, their subjective experience of mentally time travelling is accompanied by the awareness of doing so. Despite recent popularity of studying episodic memory in animals, such phenomenological consciousness has been extremely difficult to demonstrate without agreed behavioural markers of consciousness in non-linguistic subjects. We presented western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica) with a task requiring them to allocate observing time between two peepholes to see food being hidden in either of two compartments, one where observing the hiding location was necessary to later relocate the food, and another where food could easily be found without watching. Jays first separately experienced these consequences of possessing information in each compartment and subsequently, once given a choice, made more looks and spent more time looking into the compartment where information was necessary than into the compartment where it was unnecessary. Thus, the jays can collect information to solve a future problem. Moreover, they can differentiate sources of information according to their potential value and modify behaviour to efficiently collect important, usable information. This is the first evidence of metacognition in a species that passes the behavioural criteria for both retrospective and prospective mental time travel.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basile BM, Hampton RR, Suomi SJ, Murray EA (2009) An assessment of memory awareness in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 12:169–180
Bednekoff PA, Balda RP (1996a) Observational spatial memory in Clark’s nutcrackers and Mexican jays. Anim Behav 52:833–839
Bednekoff PA, Balda RP (1996b) Social caching and observational spatial memory in pinyon jays. Behaviour 133:807–826
Beran MJ, Smith JD (2011) Information seeking by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Cognition 120:90–105
Call J, Carpenter M (2001) Do apes and children know what they have seen? Anim Cogn 3:207–220
Clayton NS, Dickinson A (1998) Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 395:272–274
Correia SPC, Dickinson A, Clayton NS (2007) Western scrub-jays anticipate future needs independently of their current motivational state. Curr Biol 17:856–861
Cousineau D (2005) Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Massons method. Tutor Quant Method Psych 1:42–45
Crystal JD, Foote AL (2009) Metacognition in animals. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 4:1–16
Dally JM, Clayton NS, Emery NJ (2006) The behaviour and evolution of cache protection and pilferage. Anim Behav 72:13–23
Fujita K (2009) Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 12:169–180
Goto K, Watanabe S (2012) Large-billed crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) have retrospective but not prospective metamemory. Anim Cogn 15:27–35
Grodzinski U, Clayton NS (2010) Problems faced by food-caching corvids and the evolution of cognitive solutions. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:2651–2661
Grodzinski U, Watanabe A, Clayton NS (2012) Peep to pilfer: what scrub-jays like to watch when observing others. Anim Behav 83:1253–1260
Hampton RR (2001) Rhesus monkeys know when they remember. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5359–5362
Hampton RR (2009) Multiple demonstrations of metacognition in nonhuman: converging evidence or multiple mechanisms? Comp Cogn Behav Rev 4:17–28
Hampton RR, Zivin A, Murray EA (2004) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting. Anim Cogn 7:239–246
Inman A, Shettleworth SJ (1999) Detecting metamemory in nonverbal subjects: a test with pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 25:389–395
Kornell N, Son LK, Terrace HS (2007) Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychol Sci 18:64–71
Le Pelley ME (2012) Metacognitive monkeys or associative animals? Simple reinforcement learning explains uncertainty in nonhuman animals. J Exp Psychol Learn 38:686–708
Nelson TO, Narens L (1990) Metamemory: a theoretical framework and some new findings. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, New York, pp 125–173
Raby CR, Alexis DM, Dickinson A, Clayton NS (2007) Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 445:919–921
Roberts WA, Feeney MC, McMillan N, MacPherson K, Musolino E, Petter M (2009) Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test? J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 35:129–142
Scheid C, Bugnyar T (2008) Short-term observational spatial memory in Jackdaws (Corvus monedula) and Ravens (Corvus corax). Anim Cogn 11:691–698
Smith JD, Shields WE, Washburn DA (1998) Memory monitoring by animals and humans. J Exp Psychol Gen 127:227–250
Smith JD, Beran MJ, Couchman JJ, Coutinho MVC (2008) The comparative study of metacognition: sharper paradigms, safer inferences. Psychon Bull Rev 15:679–691
Suda-King C (2008) Do orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) know when they do not remember? Anim Cogn 11:21–42
Tulving E (2005) Episodic memory and autonoesis: uniquely human? In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J (eds) The missing link in cognition: origins of self-reflective consciousness. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–56
Watanabe S, Clayton NS (2007) Observational visuospatial encoding of the cache locations of others by western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica). J Ethol 25:271–279
Acknowledgments
We thank Brian McCabe for statistical advice and Paul Heavens, Charmaine Donovan, and the staff of the Madingley Sub-department of Animal Behaviour for care of the birds. We thank the University of Cambridge, Clare College and the BBSRC for financial support, and a postdoctoral fellowship from the Human Frontiers Scientific Programme Organisation to U.G. This study formed part of A.W.’s PhD, which was supported by an ORS award and the Cambridge Overseas Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watanabe, A., Grodzinski, U. & Clayton, N.S. Western scrub-jays allocate longer observation time to more valuable information. Anim Cogn 17, 859–867 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0719-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0719-7