Research on the comprehension of human-given cues by domesticated as well as non-domesticated species has received considerable attention over the last decade. While several species seem to be capable of utilizing these cues, former work with domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) has shown inconclusive results. In this study, we investigated the use of human-given cues in an object choice task by young domestic pigs (N = 17; 7 weeks of age) who had very limited human contact prior to the experiments. Subjects had to choose between two bowls of which only one was baited with a reward. Over the course of five experiments, pigs were able to use proximal and, with some constraints, also distal pointing cues presented in both a dynamic-sustained and in a momentary manner. When the experimenter was pointing from the incorrect bowl towards the correct one, most of the subjects had problems solving the task—indicating that some form of stimulus/local enhancement affected pigs’ decision making. Interestingly, pigs were able to utilize the body and head orientation of a human experimenter to locate the hidden reward but failed to co-orient when head or body orientation of the experimenter was directed into distant space with no bowls present. Control trials ruled out the possibility that other factors (e.g. odour cues) affected subjects’ choice behaviour. Learning during experiments played a minor role and only occurred in three out of twelve test conditions. We conclude that domestic pigs, even at a very young age, are skilful in utilizing various human-given cues in an object choice task—raising the question whether pigs only used stimulus/local enhancement and associative learning processes or whether they were able to comprehend the communicative nature of at least some of these cues.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Agnetta B, Hare B, Tomasello M (2000) Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use. Anim Cogn 3(2):107–112. doi:10.1007/s100710000070
Albiach-Serrano A, Bräuer J, Cacchione T, Zickert N, Amici F (2012) The effect of domestication and ontogeny in swine cognition (Sus scrofa scrofa and S. s. domestica). Appl Anim Behav Sci 141(1–2):25–35
Broom DM, Sena H, Moynihan KL (2009) Pigs learn what a mirror image represents and use it to obtain information. Anim Behav 78(5):1037–1041. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.027
Clutton-Brock J (1995) Origins of the dog: domestication and early history. In: Serpell JA (ed) The domestic dog: its evolution, behaviour and interaction with people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–20
Giret N, Miklósi Á, Kreutzer M, Bovet D (2009) Use of experimenter-given cues by African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Anim Cogn 12(1):1–10. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0163-2
Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? T Cogn Sci 9(9):439–444
Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298(5598):1634–1636
Held S, Mendl M, Devereux C, Byrne RW (2000) Social tactics of pigs in a competitive foraging task: the ‘informed forager’ paradigm. Anim Behav 59(3):569–576. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1322
Held S, Mendl M, Devereux C, Byrne RW (2001) Behaviour of domestic pigs in a visual perspective taking task. Behaviour 138:1337–1354. doi:10.1163/156853901317367627
Held S, Mendl M, Devereux C, Byrne RW (2002) Foraging pigs alter their behaviour in response to exploitation. Anim Behav 64:157–166. doi:10.1006/anbe 2002.3044
Hernádi A, Kis A, Turcsán B, Topál J (2012) Man’s underground best friend: domestic ferrets, unlike the wild forms, show evidence of dog-like social-cognitive skills. PLoS ONE 7(8):e43267. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043267
Kaminski J, Nitzschner M (2013) Do dogs get the point? A review of dog–human communication ability. Learn Behav. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2013.05.001
Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2005) Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Anim Behav 69(1):11–18. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.008
Maros K, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 11(3):457–466. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0136-5
McKinley J, Sambrook TD (2000) Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 3(1):13–22. doi:10.1007/s100710050046
McLeman MA, Mendl M, Jones RB, White R, Wathes CM (2005) Discrimination of conspecifics by juvenile domestic pigs, Sus scrofa. Anim Behav 70(2):451–461. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.11.013
Mech LD (2007) Possible use of foresight, understanding, and planning by wolves hunting muskoxen. Arctic 60:145–149
Mendl M, Randle K, Pope S (2002) Young female pigs can discriminate individual differences in odours from conspecific urine. Anim Behav 64(1):97–101. doi:10.1006/anbe2002.3040
Miklósi A, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9(2):81–93. doi:10.1007/s10071-005-0008-1
Miklósi Á, Pongracz P, Lakatos G, Topal J, Csanyi V (2005) A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J Comp Psychol 119(2):179–186. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.179
Mulcahy NJ, Call J (2009) The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 123(3):304–309. doi:10.1037/a0016222
Mulcahy NJ, Hedge V (2012) Are great apes tested with an abject object-choice task? Anim Behav 83(2):313–321. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.11.019
Muro C, Escobedo R, Spector L, Coppinger RP (2011) Wolf-pack (Canis lupus) hunting strategies emerge from simple rules in computational simulations. Behav Process 88:192–197
Nawroth C, Ebersbach M, von Borell E (2013) Are juvenile domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) sensitive to the attentive states of humans? The impact of impulsivity on choice behaviour. Behav Process 96:53–58. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.002
Proops L, Walton M, McComb K (2010) The use of human-given cues by domestic horses, Equus caballus, during an object choice task. Anim Behav 79(6):1205–1209. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.015
Range F, Virányi Z (2011) Development of Gaze Following Abilities in Wolves (Canis Lupus). PLoS ONE 6:e16888
Riedel J, Schumann K, Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) The early ontogeny of human–dog communication. Anim Behav 75(3):1003–1014. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.010
Rosati AG, Hare B (2009) Looking past the model species: diversity in gaze-following skills across primates. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19(1):45–51. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.03.002
Scheumann M, Call J (2004) The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus). Anim Cogn 7(4):224–230. doi:10.1007/s10071-004-0216-0
Schloegl C, Kotrschal K, Bugnyar T (2007) Gaze following in common ravens, Corvus corax: ontogeny and habituation. Anim Behav 74(4):769–778. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.08.017
Schloegl C, Kotrschal K, Bugnyar T (2008) Do common ravens (Corvus corax) rely on human or conspecific gaze cues to detect hidden food? Anim Cogn 11(2):231–241. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0105-4
Schmidt J, Scheid C, Kotrschal K, Bugnyar T, Schloegl C (2011) Gaze direction: a cue for hidden food in rooks (Corvus frugilegus)? Behav Process 88(2):88–93. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2011.08.002
Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115(2):122–126
Tomasello M, Call J, Hare B (1998) Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics. Anim Behav 55(4):1063–1069
Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2008) Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim Behav 76(6):1767–1773
Umberto A (2007) Pigs and humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Virányi Z, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Belényi B, Ujfalussy D, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 11(3):373–387. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0127-y
Wilkinson A, Mandl I, Bugnyar T, Huber L (2010) Gaze following in the red-footed tortoise (Geochelone carbonaria). Anim Cogn 13(5):765–769. doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0320-2
Wood-Gush DGM, Jensen P, Algers B (1990) Behaviour of pigs in a novel semi-natural environment. Biol Behav 15:62–73
Zonderland JJ, Cornelissen L, Wolthuis-Fillerup M, Spoolder HAM (2008) Visual acuity of pigs at different light intensities. Appl Anim Behav Sci 111(1–2):28–37. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.05.010
We would like to thank the two reviewers for their detailed comments on the manuscript.
The experiments were carried out at facilities of the Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences of the University of Halle-Wittenberg under licence of the regional veterinary control board. Housing facilities met the German welfare requirements for farm animals.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Nawroth, C., Ebersbach, M. & von Borell, E. Juvenile domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) use human-given cues in an object choice task. Anim Cogn 17, 701–713 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0702-3
- Domestic pig
- Social cognition
- Object choice
- Human-given cues
- Human–animal interaction