Dogs are strongly influenced by human behavior, and they readily form bonds with specific humans. Yet these lines of inquiry are not often combined. The goal of this study was to investigate whether such bonds would play a role in how dogs behave in response to human signals. Using various types of signals, we compared dogs’ use of information from a familiar human (their owner) versus an unfamiliar human when choosing between two food containers. In some conditions, the owner indicated a container that gave food and a stranger indicated a container that did not; in other conditions, this was reversed. Dogs more often chose the container indicated by or nearest to their owner, even when this container never yielded a food reward. In two conditions, dogs chose at chance: a control condition in which both pointers were strangers and a condition in which the owner and stranger sat reading books and provided no social signal. This is the first study to directly compare owners to strangers in a single food-choice situation. Our results suggest that dogs make decisions by attending preferentially to social signals from humans with whom they have become familiar.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. J Comp Psychol 120(1):38–47
Call J, Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117(3):257–263
Clutton-Brock J (1995) Origins of the dog: domestication and early history. In: Serpell J (ed) The domestic dog: its evolution, behavior and interactions with people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cooper JJ, Ashton C, Bishop S, West R, Mills DS, Young RJ (2003) Clever hounds: social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Appl Anim Behav Psy 81(3):229–244
Coppinger R, Coppinger L (2001) Dogs: A startling new understanding of canine origin, behavior and evolution. NY, New York
Elgier A, Jakovcevic A, Barrera G, Mustaca A (2009) Communication between domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans: dogs are good learners. Behav Proc 81:402–408
Erdohegyi Á, Topál J, Virányi Z, Miklósi Á (2007) Dog-logic: inferential reasoning in a two-way choice task and its restricted use. Anim Behav 74:725–737
Gácsi M, Kara E, Belényi B, Topál J, Miklósi Á (2009) The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogs. Anim Cogn 12:471–479
Gácsi M, Topál J, Miklósi A, Doka A, Csányi V (2001) Attachment behavior of adult dogs (Canis familiaris) living at rescue centers: forming new bonds. J Comp Psychol 114(4):423–431
Gácsi M, Győri B, Miklósi Á, Virányi Z, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) Species-specific differences and similarities in the behavior of hand-raised dog and wolf pups in social situations with humans. Dev Psychobiol 47:111–122
Gray MM, Sutter NB, Ostrander EA, Wayne RK (2010) The IGF1 small dog haplotype is derived from Middle Eastern grey wolves. Biology 8(16). doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-16
Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trend Cog Sci 9:463–464
Kubinyi E, Topál J, Miklósi A, Csányi V (2003) Dogs (Canis familiaris) learn from their owners via observation in a manipulation task. J Comp Psychol 117(2):156–165
Kundey S, De Los Reyes A, Arbuthnot J, Allen R (2010) Domesticated dogs’(Canis familiaris) response to dishonest human points. Inter J Comp Psychol 23:201–215
Marshall-Pescini S, Passalacqua C, Barnard S, Valsecchi P, Prato-Previde E (2009) Agility and search and rescue training differently affects pet dogs’ behaviour in socio-cognitive tasks. Behav Proc 81:416–422
Marshall-Pescini S, Prato-Previde E, Valsecchi P (2011) Are dogs (Canis familiaris) misled more by their owners than by strangers in a food task? Anim Cog 14(1):137–142
Marshall-Pescini S, Passalacqua C, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Valsecchi P, Prato-Previde E (2012) Do Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) make counterproductive choices because they are sensitive to human ostensive cues? PLoS ONE 7(4):e35437. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035437
McKinley J, Sambrook T (2000) Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 3:13–22
McMahon S, Macpherson K, Roberts W (2010) Dogs choose a human informant: metacognition in canines. Behav Proc 85:293–298
Merola I, Prato-Previde E, Marshall-Pescini S (2012) Social referencing in dog-owner dyads? Anim Cogn 15:175–185
Miklósi Á, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93
Miklósi Á, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn 1:113–121
Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol 13(9):763–766
Miklósi Á, Pongrácz P, Lakatos G, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and human and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J Comp Psychol 119(2):179–186
Palestrini C, Prato-Previde E, Spiezio C, Verga M (2005) Heart rate and behavioral responses of dogs in the Ainsworth’s Strange Situation: a pilot study. Appl Anim Behav Sci 94:75–88
Pettersson H, Kaminski J, Herrmann E, Tomasello M (2011) Understanding of human communicative motives in domestic dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 133(3):235–245
Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Timar-Geng K, Csányi V (2003) Preference for copying unambiguous demonstrations in dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 117(3):337–343
Pongrácz P, Vida V, Bánhegyi P, Miklósi Á (2008) How does dominance rank status affect individual and social learning performance in the dog (Canis familiaris)? Anim Cogn 11(1):75–82. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0090-7
Prato-Previde E, Marshall-Pescini S, Valsecchi P (2007) Is your choice my choice? The owners’ effect on pet dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task. Anim Cogn 11(1):167–174. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0102-7
Reid PJ (2009) Adapting to the human world: dogs’ responsiveness to our social cues. Behav Proc 80(3):325–333. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.002
Riedel J, Schumann K, Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) The early ontogeny of human-dog communication. Anim Beh 75:1003–1014
Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116(1):27–34
Szetei V, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2003) When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner. Appl Anim Behav Sci 83:141–152
Topal J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V, Dóka A (1998) A new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) Strange Situation Test. J Comp Psychol 112(3):219–229
Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (1997) Dog-human relationship affects problem solving behavior in the dog. Anthrozoos 10(4):214–227
Topál J, Kubinyi E, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á (2006) Obeying social rules: a comparative study on dogs and humans. J Cult Evol Psychol 3(3–4):223–243
Topál J, Gergely G, Erdohegyi A, Csibra G, Miklósi Á (2009) Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves and human infants. Science 325:1269–1272
Tuber D, Hennessy M, Sanders S, Miller J (1996) Behavioral and glucocorticoid responses of adult domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to companionship and social separation. J Comp Psychol 110(1):103–108
Udell M, Dorey N, Wynne C (2010) The performance of stray dogs (Canis familiaris) living in a shelter on human-guided object-choice tasks. Anim Behav 79:717–725
Udell M, Dorey N, Wynne C (2011) Can your dog read your mind? Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking. Learn and Behav 39(4):289–302
Vilà C, Savolainen P, Maldonado JE, Amorim IR, Rice JE, Honeycutt RL, Crandall KA, Lundeberg J, Wayne RK (1997) Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276(5319):1687–1689
Wayne RK, vonHoldt BM (2012) Evolutionary genomics of dog domestication. Mamm Genome 23:3–18
We thank Kelly Dunbar, Sierra Eisen, Desiree Rogers, Susan Iyican, Anna Waismeyer, Mikel Delgado, and Aryn Hervel. We also thank the Committee on Research at the University of California, Berkeley; our dog participants and their people; and the University of California Chancellor’s Fellowship awarded to AC.
Conflict of interest
List of breeds.
Labrador Retriever mix.
Australian Cattle Dog mix.
Australian Cattle Dog.
Australian Shepherd Labrador Retriever.
Rhodesian Ridgeback mix.
American Pit Bull Terrier mix.
Jack Russell Terrier mix.
Cavalier King Charles Spaniel.
Cardigan Welsh Corgi.
Unidentifiable mixed breed.
We declare that these experiments comply with the current laws of the USA.
About this article
Cite this article
Cook, A., Arter, J. & Jacobs, L.F. My owner, right or wrong: the effect of familiarity on the domestic dog’s behavior in a food-choice task. Anim Cogn 17, 461–470 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0677-0
- Domestic dog
- Canis familiaris
- Social cognition