Previous studies have suggested that body size and locomotor performance are targets of Darwinian selection in reptiles. However, much of the variation in these traits may derive from phenotypically plastic responses to incubation temperature, rather than from underlying genetic variation. Intriguingly, incubation temperature may also influence cognitive traits such as learning ability. Therefore, we might expect correlations between a reptile’s size, locomotor speed and learning ability either due to selection on all of these traits or due to environmental effects during egg incubation. In the present study, we incubated lizard eggs (Scincidae: Bassiana duperreyi) under ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ thermal regimes and then assessed differences in hatchling body size, running speed and learning ability. We measured learning ability using a Y-maze and a food reward. We found high correlations between size, speed and learning ability, using two different metrics to quantify learning (time to solution, and directness of route), and showed that environmental effects (incubation temperature) cause these correlations. If widespread, such correlations challenge any simple interpretation of fitness advantages due to body size or speed within a population; for example, survivors may be larger and faster than nonsurvivors because of differences in learning ability, not because of their size or speed.
Correlations Cognition Locomotor performance Body size
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
For funding, we thank the Australian Research Council, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Swedish Research Council (VR) and the University of Sydney. We thank Scott A. Sisson at the School of Mathematics and Statistics at the University of New South Wales for his comments on our statistical analyses.
Burghardt GM (1977) Learning processes in reptiles. In: Gans C, Tinkle DW (eds) Biology of the reptilia. Ecology and behaviour A, vol 7. Academic Press, London, pp 555–681Google Scholar
Cooper W (1994) Chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in lizards: a review with hypotheses on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationships. J Chem Ecol 20(2):439–487. doi:10.1007/bf02064449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day LB, Crews D, Wilczynski W (1999) Spatial and reversal learning in congeneric lizards with different foraging strategies. Anim Behav 57(2):393–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeming DC (2004) Reptilian incubation: environment, evolution and behaviour. Nottingham University Press, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
Gamerman D, Lopes HF (2006) Markov chain Monte Carlo: stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference, vol 68. Chapman & Hall/CRCGoogle Scholar
Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2004) Bayesian data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
Grieco F, van Noordwijk AJ, Visser ME (2002) Evidence for the effect of learning on timing of reproduction in blue tits. Science 296(5565):136–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow PS (1996) A harmless technique for sexing hatchling lizards. Herpetol Rev 27:71–72Google Scholar
Irschick DJ, Herrel A, Vanhooydonck B, Huyghe K, Damme Rv (2005) Locomotor compensation creates a mismatch between laboratory and field estimates of escape speed in lizards: a cautionary tale for performance-to-fitness studies. Evolution 59(7):1579–1587. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01807.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
Janzen FJ (1993) An experimental analysis of natural selection on body size of hatchling turtles. Ecology 74(2):332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radder RS, Quinn AE, Georges A, Sarre SD, Shine R (2008) Genetic evidence for co-occurrence of chromosomal and thermal sex-determining systems in a lizard. Biol Lett 4(2):176–178PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaras TT (2007) Birthweight, height, brain size and intellectual ability. In: Samaras TT (ed) Human body size and the laws of scaling. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 301–318Google Scholar
Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39(3):505–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner DA, Shine R (2007) Fitness of juvenile lizards depends on seasonal timing of hatching, not offspring body size. Oecologia 154(1):65–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson A, Huber L (2012) Cold-blooded cognition: reptilian cognitive abilities. In: Vonk J, Shackelford TK (eds) Oxford handbook of comparative evolutionary psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 129–143Google Scholar