Animal Cognition

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 307–316 | Cite as

Numerical acuity of fish is improved in the presence of moving targets, but only in the subitizing range

  • Christian Agrillo
  • Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
  • Angelo Bisazza
Original Paper

Abstract

There is controversy in comparative psychology about whether on the one hand non-symbolic number estimation of small (≤4) and large numbers involves a single mechanism (an approximate number system), or whether on the other hand enumeration of the numbers 1–4 is accomplished by a separate mechanism, an object tracking system. To date, support for the latter hypothesis has come only from the different ratio-dependency of performance seen in the two numerical ranges, a reading that has been criticized on several grounds. In humans, the two-system hypothesis is supported by evidence showing that manipulation of the physical properties of the stimuli (e.g., the motion of the items) has dissimilar effects on small- and large-number discrimination. In this research, we studied this effect on guppies. Initially, fish were trained to simultaneously discriminate two numerical contrasts having the same easy ratio (0.50): one in the small-number (2 vs. 4) range and one in the large-number (6 vs. 12) range. Half of the fish were presented with moving items; the other half were shown the same stimuli without motion. Fish were then subjected to non-reinforced probe trials in the presence of a more difficult ratio (0.75: 3 vs. 4 and 9 vs. 12). Under both static and moving conditions, the fish significantly discriminated 6 versus 12, but not 9 versus 12 items. As regards small numbers, both groups learned to discriminate a 0.50 ratio, but only fish tested with moving stimuli also discriminated 3 and 4 items. This differential effect suggests that fish may possess two separate systems for small- and large-number discrimination.

Keywords

OTS ANS Subitizing Numerical cognition Continuous variables Guppies 

References

  1. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G (2008a) Choice of female groups by male mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Ethology 114(5):479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G, Bisazza A (2008b) Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 11:495–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G, Bisazza A (2009) Use of number by fish. PLoS ONE 4(3):e4786PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A (2010) Large number discrimination by fish. PLoS ONE 5(12):e15232PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A (2011) Number versus continuous quantity in numerosity judgments by fish. Cognition 119:281–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A, Butterworth B (2012a) Evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies. PLoS ONE 7(2):e31923PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Agrillo C, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Piffer L, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2012b) A new training procedure for studying discrimination learning in fishes. Behav Brain Res 230:343–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Agrillo C, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Tagliapietra C, Bisazza A (2012c) Inter-specific differences in numerical abilities among teleost fish. Front Psychol 3:483. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00483 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Alston L, Humphreys GW (2004) Subitization and attentional engagement by transient stimuli. Spat Vis 17:17–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Assad JA, Maunsell JHR (1995) Neuronal correlates of inferred motion in primate posterior parietal cortex. Nature 373:518–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beran MJ (2004) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond to nonvisible sets after one-by-one addition and removal of items. J Comp Psychol 118:25–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beran MJ (2008a) The evolutionary and developmental foundations of mathematics. PLoS Biol 6:221–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beran MJ (2008b) Monkeys (Macaca mulatta and Cebus apella) track, enumerate, and compare multiple sets of moving items. J Exp Psych Anim Behav Proc 34:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beran MJ, Evans TA, Leighty KA, Harris EH, Rice D (2008) Summation and quantity judgments of sequentially presented sets by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Am J Primatol 70:191–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Beran MJ, Perdue BM, Parrish AE, Evans TA (2012) Do social conditions affect capuchin monkeys’ (Cebus apella) choices in a quantity judgment task? Front Psychol 3:492. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00492 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Beran MJ, McIntyre JM, Garland A, Evans TA (2013) What counts for “counting”? Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond appropriately to relevant and irrelevant information in a quantity judgment task. Anim Behav 85:987–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bisazza A, Serena G, Piffer L, Agrillo C (2010) Ontogeny of numerical abilities in guppies. PLoS ONE 5(11):e15516PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bonanni R, Natoli E, Cafazzo S, Valsecchi P (2011) Free ranging dogs assess the quantity of opponents in intergroup conflicts. Anim Cogn 14:103–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buckingham JN, Wong BBM, Rosenthal GG (2007) Shoaling decision in female swordtails: how do fish gauge group size? Behaviour 144:1333–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cantlon JF, Brannon EM (2007) Basic math in monkeys and college students. PLoS Biol 5(12):e328PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chesney DL, Haladjian H (2011) Evidence for a shared mechanism used in multiple-object tracking and subitizing. Atten Percept Psychophys 73:2457–2480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cordes S, Brannon EM (2009) Crossing the divide: infants discriminate small from large numerosities. Dev Psychol 45:1583–1594PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cutini S, Bonato M (2012) Subitizing and visual short term memory in human and non-human species: a common shared system? Front Psychol 3:469. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00469 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dacke M, Srinivasan MV (2008) Evidence for counting in insects. Anim Cogn 11:683–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Durgin FH (1995) Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:149–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Evans TA, Beran MJ, Harris EH, Rice D (2009) Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 12:97–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans TA, Beran MJ, Addessi E (2010) Can nonhuman primates use tokens to represent and sum quantities? J Comp Psychol 124:369–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feigenson L, Carey S (2005) On the limits of infants’ quantification of small object arrays. Cognition 97:295–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feigenson L, Carey S, Hauser MD (2002a) The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychol Sci 13:150–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feigenson L, Carey S, Spelke ES (2002b) Infants’ discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cogn Psychol 44:33–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke ES (2004) Core systems of number. Trends Cogn Sci 8(7):307–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Flombaum JI, Junge JA, Hauser MD (2005) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) spontaneously compute addition operations over large numbers. Cognition 97:315–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gallistel CR, Gelman R (1992) Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition 44:43–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Garland A, Low J, Burns KC (2012) Large quantity discrimination by North Island robins (Petroica longipes). Anim Cogn 15:1129–1140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gebuis T, Reynvoet B (2012) The role of visual information in numerosity estimation. PLoS ONE 7(5):e37426PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gelman R, Gallistel C (1978) The child’s understanding of number. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Gómez-Laplaza LM, Gerlai R (2011) Spontaneous discrimination of small quantities: shoaling preferences in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare). Anim Cogn 14(4):565–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gómez-Laplaza LM, Gerlai R (2012) Activity counts: the effect of swimming activity on quantity discrimination in fish. Front Psychol 3:484. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00484 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gross HJ, Pahl M, Si A, Zhu H, Tautz J, Zhang S (2009) Number-based visual generalisation in the honeybee. PLoSONE 4:e4263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Halberda J, Mazzocco M, Feigenson L (2008) Individual differences in nonverbal number acuity predict maths achievement. Nature 455:665–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hauser MD, Spelke ES (2004) Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: a case study of mathematics. In: Gazzaniga M (ed) The cognitive neurosciences, vol 3. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Hauser MD, Carey S, Hauser LB (2000) Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:829–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hunt S, Low J, Burns KC (2008) Adaptive numerical competency in a food-hoarding songbird. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2373–2379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jevons WS (1871) The power of numerical discrimination. Nature 3(67):281–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kaufman EL, Lord MW, Reese TW, Volkmann J (1949) The discrimination of visual number. Am J Psychol 62(4):498–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kilian A, Yaman S, Fersen L, Güntürkün O (2003) A bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity. Learn Behav 31:133–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Krusche P, Uller C, Ursula D (2010) Quantity discrimination in salamanders. J Exp Biol 213:1822–1828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lipton J, Spelke ES (2003) Origins of number sense: large number discrimination in human infants. Psychol Sci 14:396–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mandler G, Shebo BJ (1982) Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 111:1–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matsuno T, Tomonaga M (2006) Visual search for moving and stationary items in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). Behav Brain Res 172:219–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miletto Petrazzini ME, Agrillo C, Piffer L, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2012) Development and application of a new method to investigate cognition in newborn guppies. Behav Brain Res 233:443–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miletto Petrazzini ME, Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A (2013) Ontogeny of the capacity to compare discrete quantities in fish. Dev Psychobiol, online first, doi:10.1002/dev.21122
  53. Neisser U (1967) Cognitive psychology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  54. Nieder A, Dehaene S (2009) Representation of number in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 32:185–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pahl M, Si A, Zhang S (2013) Numerical cognition in bees and other insects. Front Psychol 4:162. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00162 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Perdue BM, Talbot CF, Stone A, Beran MJ (2012) Putting the elephant back in the herd: elephant relative quantity judgments match those of other species. Anim Cogn 15:955–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Piffer L, Agrillo C, Hyde CD (2012) Small and large number discrimination in guppies. Anim Cogn 15:215–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Piffer L, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Agrillo C (2013) Large number discrimination in newborn fish. PLoS ONE 8(4):e62466PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pisa PE, Agrillo C (2009) Quantity discrimination in felines: a preliminary investigation of the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus). J Ethol 27:289–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Revkin SK, Piazza M, Izard V, Cohen L, Dehaene S (2008) Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation? Psychol Sci 19:607–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ross J (2003) Visual discrimination of number without counting. Percept 32:867–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scholl BJ, Pylyshyn ZW (1999) Tracking multiple items through occlusion: clues to visual objecthood. Cogn Psychol 38:259–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Trick LM (2008) More than superstition: differential effects of featural heterogeneity and change on subitizing and counting. Percept Psychophys 70:743–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Trick LM, Pylyshyn ZW (1994) Why are small and large number enumerated differently: a limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychol Rev 101(1):80–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Trick LM, Audet D, Dales L (2003) Age differences in enumerating things that move: implications for the development of multiple-object tracking. Mem Cogn 31(8):1229–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Marle K (2013) Infants use different mechanisms to make small and large number ordinal judgments. J Exp Child Psych 114(1):102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Oeffelen MP, Vos PG (1982) A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number. Percept Psychophys 32:163–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vetter P, Butterworth B, Bahrami B (2008) Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism. PLoS ONE 3(9):e3269PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vonk J, Beran MJ (2012) Bears “count” too: quantity estimation and comparison in black bears (Ursus americanus). Anim Behav 84:231–238PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vos PG, Van Oeffelen MP, Tibosch HJ, Allik J (1988) Area-numerosity interactions. Psychol Res 50:148–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ward C, Smuts BB (2007) Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Cogn 10:71–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wood JN, Spelke ES (2005) Infants’ enumeration of actions: numerical discrimination and its signature limits. Dev Sci 8(2):173–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Woodworth RS, Schlosberg H (1954) Experimental psychology. Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. Xu F (2003) Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition 89(1):B15–B25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Xu F, Spelke ES (2000) Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 74:B1–B11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Xu F, Spelke ES, Goddard S (2005) Number sense in human infants. Dev Sci 8(1):88–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Agrillo
    • 1
  • Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
    • 1
  • Angelo Bisazza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General PsychologyUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations