“Insight” in pigeons: absence of means–end processing in displacement tests
- 372 Downloads
The understanding of functional relations between action and consequence is a critical component of intelligence. To examine this linkage in pigeons, we investigated their understanding of the relations of the elements tested in an extension of Köhler’s box stacking task to this species. In the experiments, the pigeons had to move a spatially displaced box under an out-of-reach target. Experiment 1 successfully replicated and extended the previous finding showing that when separately trained to move a box and stand on it to peck the target, pigeons can synthesize these behaviors to solve the single-box displacement problem quickly on their first attempt. Experiment 2 tested whether pigeons, when given a simultaneous choice between two boxes with identical reinforcement histories, would selectively choose the box with the correct functional affordance (i.e., permitting standing) to solve the problem rather than a non-functional one. Their extensive, equivalent, and undirected behavior in moving both boxes during these tests suggests the pigeons did not possess a means–end understanding of the functional properties of the boxes. Instead, their results were consistent with an analysis of their earlier synthetic behavior as being due to the temporal and spatial relations of the physical elements in the task and their prior learned behaviors.
KeywordsInsight Means–end Pigeons Learning Physical cognition Experience
The authors wish to thank Evan McLean for his assistance in conducting these experiments, Ali Qadri, Justin Sayde, and Carl Hagmann for their comments on earlier drafts and Melissa Langer, Emily McDowell, Lilly Wong, and Jessica Levine for their assistance in scoring behaviors. This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation.
- Bluff LA, Weir AAS, Rutz C, Wimpenny JH, Kacelnik A (2007) Tool-related cognition in new Caledonian crows. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 2:1–25Google Scholar
- Cook RG (2002) Same-different concept formation in pigeons. In: Bekoff M, Allen C, Burghardt G (eds) The cognitive animal: empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 229–237Google Scholar
- Cook RG, Wasserman EA (2006) Relational learning in pigeons. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall T (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford University Press, London, pp 307–324Google Scholar
- Hearst E, Jenkins HM (1974) Sign-tracking: the stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Psychonomic Society, AustinGoogle Scholar
- Köhler W (1925) The mentality of apes. Routlege and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Luciano MC (1991) Problem solving behavior: an experimental example. Psicothema 3:297–317Google Scholar
- Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE (1995) The nature of insight. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Thorpe WH (1956) Learning and instinct in animals. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar