Animal Cognition

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 933–943 | Cite as

Gaze alternation in dogs and toddlers in an unsolvable task: evidence of an audience effect

  • S. Marshall-Pescini
  • E. Colombo
  • C. Passalacqua
  • I. Merola
  • E. Prato-Previde
Original Paper

Abstract

Dogs have been shown to use human-directed gazing behaviour and gaze alternation in numerous contexts; however, it is still unclear whether this behaviour can be considered an intentional and referential communicative act. In the current study, adult dogs and preverbal toddlers were tested using the classic unsolvable task paradigm, but varying the attentional stance of the participating audience (the experimenter and the caregiver). The aims were to assess (1) whether dogs and toddlers would use gaze alternation behaviour in similar manners when the task became unsolvable, and (2) whether both dogs and toddlers would take into account the attentional stance of the audience when initiating a communicative interaction. Results indicated that both toddlers and dogs increased their gaze alternation behaviour between the apparatus and caregiver when the task became unsolvable, and toddlers also showed an increase in pointing behaviour. Furthermore, both species showed a capacity to take into account the attentional stance of the audience when manifesting gaze alternation behaviours towards them. Taken together, these results suggest that gaze alternation is both an intentional and referential communicative act and that both species can take into account the need for audience attention when communicating with them.

Keywords

Dogs Toddlers Attention Communication Gaze alternation 

References

  1. Bates E, Camaioni L, Volterra V (1975) The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Q 21:205–226Google Scholar
  2. Bates E, Benigni L, Bretherton I, Camaioni L, Volterra V (1979) The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentosela M, Barrera G, Jakovcevic A, Elgier AM, Mustaca AE (2008) Effect of reinforcement, reinforcer omission and extinction on a communicative response in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behav Process 78:464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2004) Visual perspective taking in dogs (Canis familiaris) in the presence of barriers. Appl Anim Behav Sci 88:299–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butterworth G (1991) The ontogeny and phylogeny of joint visual attention. In: Whiten A (ed) Natural theories of mind: evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, pp 223–232Google Scholar
  6. Call J (2001) Chimpanzee social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 5:369–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Call J, Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117:257–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter M, Call J (in press) How joint is the joint attention of apes and human infants? In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J (eds), Agency and joint attention. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter M, Nagell K, Tomasello M (1998) Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9- to 15-months of age. Monogr Soc Res Child 63:1–176Google Scholar
  10. Corkum V, Moore C (1998) The origins of joint visual attention in infants. Dev Psychol 34:28–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elgier AM, Jakovcevic A, Mustaca AE, Bentosela M (2009) Learning and owner-stranger effects on interspecific communication in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behav Process 81:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gácsi M, Miklósi A, Varga O, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Are readers of our face of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent cognition of human’s attention. Anim Cognit 7(3):144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaunet F (2008) How do guide dogs blind owners and pet dogs of sighted owners (Canis familiaris) ask their owners for food? Anim Cognit 11(3):475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaunet F (2010) How dogs and pet dogs (Canis familiaris) ask their owners for their toy and for playing? Anim Cognit 13(2):311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gomez J (1990) The emergence of intentional communication as a problem-solving strategy in the gorilla. In: Parker S, Gibson K (eds) ‘‘Language’’ and intelligence in monkeys and apes: comparative developmental perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 333–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomez J (2005) Joint attention and the sensorimotor notion of subject: insights from apes, normal children, and children with autism. In: Eilan N, Hoerl C, McCormack T, Roessler J (eds) Joint attention: communication and other minds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cognit Sci 9:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (1998) Communication of food location between human and dog (Canis familiaris). Evol Commun 2:137–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hattori Y, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2007) I know you are looking at me: capuchin monkeys’ (Cebus apella) sensitivity to human attentional states. Anim Cognit 10(2):141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horn L, Virányi Z, Miklósi Á, Huber L, Range F (2012) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) flexibly adjust their human-directed behavior to the actions of their human partners in a problem situation. Anim Cognit 15(1):57–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaminski J, Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2009) Domestic dogs are sensitive to human’s perspective. Behaviour 146(7):979–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaminski J, Neumann J, Call J, Tomasello M (2011) Dogs (Canis familiaris) communicate with humans to request but not to inform. Anim Behav 82(4):651–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaminski J, Schulz L, Tomasello M (2012) How dogs know when communication is intended for them. Dev Sci 15(2):222–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lakatos G, Soproni K, Dóka A, Miklósi Á (2009) A comparative approach to dogs’ (Canis familiaris) and human infants’ comprehension forms of pointing gestures. Anim Cognit 12(4):621–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leavens DA, Racine TP (2009) Joint attention in apes and human: are human unique? J Conscious Stud 16(6–8):240–267Google Scholar
  27. Leavens DA, Russell JL, Hopkins WD (2005) Intentionality as measured in the persistence and elaboration of communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Child Dev 76(1):291–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liszkowski U, Carpenter M, Henning A, Striano T, Tomasello M (2004) Twelve-month-olds point to share attention and interest. Dev Sci 7(3):297–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marshall-Pescini S, Valsecchi P, Petak I, Accorsi PA, Previde EP (2008) Does training make you smarter? The effects of training on dogs’ performance (Canis familiaris) in a problem solving task. Behav Process 78(3):449–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marshall-Pescini S, Passalacqua C, Barnard S, Valsecchi P, Prato Previde E (2009) Agility and search and rescue training differently affects pet dogs’ behaviour in socio-cognitive task. Behav Process 78:449–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marshall-Pescini S, Prato-Previde E, Valsecchi P (2011) Are dogs (Canis familiaris) misled more by their owners than by strangers in a food choice task? Anim Cognit 14:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merola I, Prato-Previde E, Marshall-Pescini S (2012a) Social referencing in owner-dog dyads? Anim Cognit 15(2):175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Merola I, Prato-Previde E, Marshall-Pescini S (2012b) Dogs’ social referencing towards owners and strangers. PLoS ONE 7(10):e47653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miklósi Á, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V (2000) Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of ‘showing’ behaviour in the dog. Anim Cognit 3:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? Anim Behav 67:995–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore C, Angelopoulos M, Bennett P (1997) The role of movement in the development of joint visual attention. Infant Behav Dev 20:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mundy P, Newell L (2007) Attention, joint attention, and social cognition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 16(5):269–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Passalacqua C, Marshall-Pescini S, Lakatos G, Valsecchi P, Prato-Previde E (2011) Human-directed gazing behaviour in puppies and adult dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Behav 82(5):1043–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reddy V, Morris P (2004) Participants don’t need theories: knowing minds in engagements. Theory Psychol 14:647–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reeb-Sutherland BC, Levitt P, Fox NA (2012) The predictive nature of individual differences in early associative learning and emerging social behavior. PLoS ONE 7(1):e30511. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030511 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwab C, Huber L (2006) Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. J Comp Psychol 120(3):169–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115(2):122–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116(1):27–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Striano T, Rochat P (2000) Emergence of selective social referencing in infancy. Infancy 1(2):253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tomasello M (1995) Joint attention as social cognition. In: Moore C, Dunham PJ (eds) Joint attention: its origin and role in development. Erlbaum, Hilsdale, pp 103–130Google Scholar
  47. Tomasello M (1999) The human adaptation for culture. Annu Rev Anthropol 28:509–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tomasello M (2008) Origins of human communication. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci 28:675–735PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Topál J, Gergely G, Erdohegyi A, Csibra G, Miklósi A (2009) Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science 325:1269–1272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2011) Can your dog read your mind? Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking. Learn Behav 39(4):289–302. doi:10.3758/s13420-011-0034-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Virányi Z, Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklósi A, Csányi V (2004) Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus. Behav Process 66:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Virányi Z, Topál J, Miklósi A, Csányi V (2006) A nonverbal test of knowledge attribution: a comparative study on dogs and children. Anim Cognit 9:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zinober B, Martlew M (1985) Developmental changes in four types of gesture in relation to acts and vocalizations from 10 to 21 months. Br J Dev Psychol 3:293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Marshall-Pescini
    • 1
  • E. Colombo
    • 1
  • C. Passalacqua
    • 1
  • I. Merola
    • 1
  • E. Prato-Previde
    • 1
  1. 1.Sez. di Psicologia, Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia medico-chirurgica e dei TrapiantiUniversità di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations