Gaze alternation in dogs and toddlers in an unsolvable task: evidence of an audience effect
Dogs have been shown to use human-directed gazing behaviour and gaze alternation in numerous contexts; however, it is still unclear whether this behaviour can be considered an intentional and referential communicative act. In the current study, adult dogs and preverbal toddlers were tested using the classic unsolvable task paradigm, but varying the attentional stance of the participating audience (the experimenter and the caregiver). The aims were to assess (1) whether dogs and toddlers would use gaze alternation behaviour in similar manners when the task became unsolvable, and (2) whether both dogs and toddlers would take into account the attentional stance of the audience when initiating a communicative interaction. Results indicated that both toddlers and dogs increased their gaze alternation behaviour between the apparatus and caregiver when the task became unsolvable, and toddlers also showed an increase in pointing behaviour. Furthermore, both species showed a capacity to take into account the attentional stance of the audience when manifesting gaze alternation behaviours towards them. Taken together, these results suggest that gaze alternation is both an intentional and referential communicative act and that both species can take into account the need for audience attention when communicating with them.
KeywordsDogs Toddlers Attention Communication Gaze alternation
This research was supported by funds from the Università di Milano to Sarah Marshall-Pescini and Emanuela Prato-Previde and doctoral grants from the same University to Chiara Passalacqua and Isabella Merola. We would like to thank all the owners and their dogs that participated as volunteers. This research complies with the current Italian laws on animal welfare.
- Bates E, Camaioni L, Volterra V (1975) The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Q 21:205–226Google Scholar
- Bates E, Benigni L, Bretherton I, Camaioni L, Volterra V (1979) The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Butterworth G (1991) The ontogeny and phylogeny of joint visual attention. In: Whiten A (ed) Natural theories of mind: evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, pp 223–232Google Scholar
- Carpenter M, Call J (in press) How joint is the joint attention of apes and human infants? In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J (eds), Agency and joint attention. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Carpenter M, Nagell K, Tomasello M (1998) Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9- to 15-months of age. Monogr Soc Res Child 63:1–176Google Scholar
- Leavens DA, Racine TP (2009) Joint attention in apes and human: are human unique? J Conscious Stud 16(6–8):240–267Google Scholar
- Tomasello M (1995) Joint attention as social cognition. In: Moore C, Dunham PJ (eds) Joint attention: its origin and role in development. Erlbaum, Hilsdale, pp 103–130Google Scholar
- Tomasello M (2008) Origins of human communication. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar