Abstract
For many decades, developmental and comparative psychologists have used a variety of string tasks to assess the perceptual and cognitive capabilities of human children of different ages and different species of nonhuman animals. The most important and widely used of these problems are patterned-string tasks, in which the organism is shown two or more strings, only one of which is connected to a reward. The organism must determine which string is attached to the reward and pull it. We report a new way to implement patterned-string tasks via a computerized touch screen apparatus. Pigeons successfully learned such virtual patterned-string tasks and exhibited the same general performance profile as animals given conventional patterned-string tasks. In addition, variations in the length, separation, and alignment of the strings reliably affected the pigeons’ virtual string-pulling behavior. These results not only testify to the power and versatility of our computerized string task, but they also demonstrate that pigeons can concurrently contend with a broad range of demanding patterned-string problems, thereby eliminating many alternative interpretations of their behavior. The virtual patterned-string task may thus permit expanded exploration of other species and variables which would be unlikely to be undertaken either because of inadequacies of conventional methodology or sensorimotor limitations of the studied organisms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.





References
Adams DK (1929) Experimental studies of adaptive behavior in cats. Comp Psychol Monogr 6:1–166
Albiach-Serrano A, Bugnyar T, Call J (2012) Apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, P. troglodytes, Pongo abelii) Versus Corvids (Corvus corax, C. corone) in a support task: the effect of pattern and functionality. J Comp Psychol 126:355–367
Auersperg AMI, Gajdon GK, Huber L (2009) Kea (Nestor notabilis) consider spatial relationships between objects in the support problem. Biol Lett 5:455–458
Bagotskaya MS, Smirnova AA, Zorina ZA (2011) Corvidae can understand logical structure in baited string-pulling tasks. Neurosci Behav Physiol 42:36–42
Balasch J, Sabater-Pi J, Padrosa T (1974) Perceptual learning ability in Mandrillus sphinx and Cercopithecus nictitans. Rev Esp Fisiol 30:15–20
Brainard PP (1930) The mentality of a child compared with that of the apes. J Genet Psychol 37:268–293
Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436
Cha JH, King JE (1969) The learning of patterned strings problems by squirrel monkeys. Anim Behav 17:64–67
Cole EF, Cram DL, Quinn JL (2011) Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits. Anim Behav 81:491–498
de Mendonca-Furtado O, Ottoni EB (2008) Learning generalization in problem solving by a blue-fronted parrot (Amazona aestiva). Anim Cogn 11:719–725
Deaner RO, van Schaik CP, Johnson V (2006) Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies. Evol Psychol 4:149–196
Dewsbury DA (2000) Comparative cognition in the 1930s. Psychon Bull Rev 7:267–283
Dücker G, Rensch B (1977) The solution of patterned string problems by birds. Behaviour 62:164–173
Emery NJ (2006) Cognitive ornithology: the evolution of avian intelligence. Philos Trans R Soc B361:23–43
Finch G (1941) The solution of patterned string problems by chimpanzees. J Comp Psychol 32:83–90
Fischer GJ, Kitchener SL (1965) Comparative learning in young gorillas and orang-utans. J Genet Psychol 107:337–348
Funk MS (2002) Problem solving skills in young yellow-crowned parakeets (Cyanoramphus auriceps). Anim Cogn 5:167–176
Gagne M, Levesque K, Nutile L, Locurto C (2012) Performance on patterned string problems by common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Anim Cogn 15:1021–1030
Gesell A (1928) Infancy and human growth. Macmillan, New York
Gibson BM, Wasserman EA, Frei L, Miller K (2004) Recent advances in operant conditioning technology: a versatile and affordable computerized touch screen system. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36:355–362
Halsey LG, Bezerra BM, Souto AS (2006) Can wild common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) solve the parallel strings task? Anim Cogn 9:229–233
Harlow HF, Settlage PH (1934) Comparative behavior of primates VII. Capacity of monkeys to solve patterned string tests. J Comp Psychol 18:423–435
Hauser MD, Kralik J, Botto-Mahan C (1999) Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus oedipus. Anim Behav 57:565–582
Heinrich B, Bugnyar T (2005) Testing problem solving in ravens: string-pulling to reach food. Ethology 111:962–976
Herrmann E, Wobber V, Call J (2008) Great apes’ (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) understanding of tool functional properties after limited experience. J Comp Psychol 122:220–230
Huber L, Gajdon GK (2006) Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model. Anim Cogn 9:295–305
Irie-Sugimoto N, Kobayashi T, Sato T, Hasegawa T (2008) Evidence of means-end behavior in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Anim Cogn 11:359–365
Klüver H (1933) Behavior mechanisms in monkeys. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Mathieson E (1931) A study of problem solving behaviour in pre-school children. Child Dev 2:242–262
Michels KM, Pustek JJ Jr, Johnson JI Jr (1961) The solution of patterned-strings problems by raccoons. J Comp Physiol Psychol 54:433–441
Miyata H, Fujita K (2011) Flexible route selection by pigeons (Columba livia) on a computerized multi-goal navigation task with and without an “obstacle”. J Comp Psychol 125:431–435
Mulcahy NJ, Schubiger MS, Suddendorf T (2012) Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus and Pongo abelii) understand connectivity in the skewered grape tool task. J Comp Psychol
Osthaus B, Lea SEG, Slater AM (2005) Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task. Anim Cogn 8:37–47
Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10:437–442
Pepperberg IM (2004) ‘Insightful’ string-pulling in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) is affected by vocal competence. Anim Cogn 7:263–266
Pfuhl G (2012) Two strings to choose from: do ravens pull the easier one? Anim Cogn 15:549–557
Piaget J (1937) La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Delachaux et Niestlé, Paris
Range F, Hentrup M, Virányi Z (2011) Dogs are able to solve a means-end task. Anim Cogn 14:575–583
Range F, Möslinger H, Virányi Z (2012) Domestication has not affected the understanding of means-end connections in dogs. Anim Cogn 15:597–607
Richardson HM (1932) The growth of adaptive behavior in infants. Genet Psychol Monogr 12:195–357
Riesen AH, Greenberg B, Granston AS, Fantz RL (1953) Solutions of patterned string problems by young gorillas. J Comp Psychol 46:19–22
Schmidt GF, Cook RG (2006) Mind the gap: means-end discrimination by pigeons. Anim Behav 71:599–608
Schuck-Paim C, Borsari A, Ottoni EB (2009) Means to an end: Neotropical parrots manage to pull strings to meet their goals. Anim Cogn 12:287–301
Seibt U, Wickler W (2006) Individuality in problem solving: string pulling in two Carduelis species (Aves: Passeriformes). Ethology 112:493–502
Taylor AH, Medina FS, Holzhaider JC, Hearne LJ, Hunt GR, Gray RD (2010) An investigation into the cognition behind spontaneous string pulling in New Caledonian crows. PLoS ONE 5:1–7
Thorpe WH (1964) Learning and instinct in animals. Methuen & Co. Ltd, London
Tolman EC (1937) The acquisition of string-pulling by rats—conditioned response or sign-gestalt? Psychol Rev 44:195–211
Trueblood CK, Smith KU (1934) String-pulling behavior of the cat. J Genet Psychol 44:414–427
Vince MA (1956) String-pulling in birds I. Individual differences in wild adult great tits. Br J Anim Behav 4:111–116
Vince MA (1958) String-pulling in birds II. Differences related to age in greenfinches, chaf-finches and canaries. Anim Behav 6:53–59
Vince MA (1961) String-pulling in birds III. The successful response in greenfinches and canaries. Behaviour 17:103–129
Warden CJ, Koch AM, Fjeld HA (1940) Solution of patterned string problems by monkeys. Pedagog Semin J Genet Psychol 56:283–295
Werdenich D, Huber L (2006) A case of quick problem solving in birds: string-pulling in keas (Nestor notabilis). Anim Behav 71:855–863
Whitt E, Douglas M, Osthaus B, Hockin I (2009) Domestic cats (Felis catus) do not show causal understanding in a string-pulling task. Anim Cogn 12:739–743
Willatts P (1999) Development of means-end behavior in young infants: pulling a support to retrieve a distant object. Dev Psychol 35:651–667
Yocom AM, Boysen ST (2010) Capuchins (Cebus apella) can solve a means-end problem. J Comp Psychol 124:271–277
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Sacha Perez for help in preparing the videos in the online supplementary material.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wasserman, E.A., Nagasaka, Y., Castro, L. et al. Pigeons learn virtual patterned-string problems in a computerized touch screen environment. Anim Cogn 16, 737–753 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0608-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0608-0
Keywords
- Patterned-string task
- Pigeons
- Touch screen
- Perception
- Cognition