Animal Cognition

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 385–394 | Cite as

Dogs steal in the dark

  • Juliane Kaminski
  • Andrea Pitsch
  • Michael Tomasello
Original Paper

Abstract

All current evidence of visual perspective taking in dogs can possibly be explained by dogs reacting to certain stimuli rather than understanding what others see. In the current study, we set up a situation in which contextual information and social cues are in conflict. A human always forbade the dog from taking a piece of food. The part of the room being illuminated was then varied, for example, either the area where the human was seated or the area where the food was located was lit. Results show that dogs steal significantly more food when it is dark compared to when it is light. While stealing forbidden food the dog’s behaviour also depends on the type of illumination in the room. Illumination around the food, but not the human, affected the dogs’ behaviour. This indicates that dogs do not take the sight of the human as a signal to avoid the food. It also cannot be explained by a low-level associative rule of avoiding illuminated food which dogs actually approach faster when they are in private. The current finding therefore raises the possibility that dogs take into account the human’s visual access to the food while making their decision to steal it.

Keywords

Domestic dog Social cognition Perspective taking Competition 

References

  1. Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2004) Visual perspective taking in dogs (Canis familiaris) in the presence of barriers. Appl Anim Behav Sci 88:299–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Chimpanzees really know what others can see in a competitive situation. Anim Cogn 10:439–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Call J, Tomasello M (2008) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends Cogn Sci 12:187–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Call J, Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117:257–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper JJ, Ashton C, Bishop S, West R, Mills DS, Young RJ (2003) Clever hounds: social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Appl Anim Behav Sci 81:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dally JM, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2004) Cache protection strategies by western Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma californica): hiding food in the shade. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:S387–S390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dally JM, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2005) Cache protection strategies by western Scrub-Jays, Aphelocoma californica: implications for social cognition. Anim Behav 70:1251–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dally JM, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2006) Food-caching western Scrub-Jays keep track of who was watching when. Science 310:1662–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2001) Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by Scrub Jays. Nature 414:443–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gácsi M, Miklósi A, Varga O, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention. Anim Cogn 7:144–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hare B, Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M (2000) Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim Behav 59:771–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2001) Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Anim Behav 61:139–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2004) Body orientation and face orientation: two factors controlling apes’ begging behavior from humans. Anim Cogn 7:216–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe. Cognition 109:224–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaminski J, Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2009) Domestic dogs are sensitive to a human’s perspective. Behaviour 146:979–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liebal K, Pika S, Call J, Tomasello M (2004) To move or not to move: how great apes adjust to the attentional state of others? Interact Stud 5:199–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorenz RJ (1996) Grundbegriffe der Biometrie. Gustav Fischer Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  18. Melis AP, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) conceal visual and auditory information from others. J Comp Psychol 120:154–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller PE, Murphey CJ (1995) Vision in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 207:1623–1634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwab C, Huber L (2006) Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. J Comp Psychol 120:169–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2011) Can your dog read your mind? Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking. Learn Behav 39:289–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Virányi Z, Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklosi A, Csányi V (2004) Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus. Behav Process 66:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juliane Kaminski
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrea Pitsch
    • 2
  • Michael Tomasello
    • 2
  1. 1.University of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations