Skip to main content
Log in

Time preferences in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) and humans (Homo sapiens)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rosati et al. (Curr Biol 17(19):1663–1668, 2007) found in a self-control test in which choice was between a smaller, immediately delivered food and a larger, delayed food, that chimpanzees preferred the larger reward (self-control); humans, however, preferred the smaller reward (impulsivity). They attributed their results to a species difference in self-control. In Experiment 1, monkeys (long-tailed macaques) were exposed to a self-control task in two conditions: where the food was hidden under differently colored bowls and where it was visible. When these two conditions were compared, choice shifted from greater preference for the impulsive alternative in the hidden condition to greater preference for the self-control alternative in the visible condition. Additionally, in both conditions, preference shifted from self-control to impulsivity over sessions. These results were explained in terms of the reversed-contingency effect (a propensity to reach for more over less when rewards are visible) and not to a capacity for self-control. In Experiment 2, humans that demonstrated preference for more over less in choice preferred the impulsive alternative when choice to either alternative was followed by the same intertrial interval—a preference that accelerates trial rates relative to preference of the self-control alternative. When trial rates were equated so that neither choice accelerated session’s end, humans demonstrated self-control. These results suggest that Rosati et al.’s demonstration of impulsivity in humans was due to participants’ desire to minimize session time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albaich-Serrano A, Guillen-Salazar F, Call J (2007) Mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus) solve the reverse contingency task without a modified procedure. Anim Cogn 10:87–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR, Awazu S, Fujita K (2000) Can squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) learn self-control? A study using food array selection tests and reverse-reward contingency. J Exp Psychol Anim B 26:87–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1995) Responses to quantity: perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim B 21:82–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen MK, Lakshminarayanan V, Santos LR (2006) How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. J Polit Econ 114:517–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark FC (1958) The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding. J Exp Anal Behav 1:221–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM (2008) Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annu Rev Psychol 59:279–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egan LC, Santos LR, Bloom P (2007) The origins of cognitive dissonance: evidence from children and monkeys. Psychol Sci 18:978–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forzano LB, Logue AW (1992) Predictors of adult humans’ self-control and impulsiveness for food reinforcers. Appetite 19:33–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Genty E, Roeder JJ (2006) Self-control: why should sea lions, Zalophus californianus, perform better than primates? Anim Behav 72:1241–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genty E, Palmier C, Roeder JJ (2004) Learning to suppress responses to the larger of two rewards in two species of lemurs, Eulemur fulvus and E. macaco. Anim Behav 67:925–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genty E, Chung PCS, Roeder JJ (2011) Testing brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus) on the reverse-reward contingency task without a modified procedure. Behav Process 86:133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosch J, Neuringer A (1981) Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav 35:3–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hachiga Y, Silberberg A, Parker S, Sakagami T (2009) Humans (Homo sapiens) fail to show inequity aversion in analogue of monkey inequity test. Anim Cogn 12:359–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue S, Matsuzawa T (2007) Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees. Curr Biol 17:R1004–R1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science 318:107–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kralik JD, Hauser MD, Zimlicki R (2002) The relationship between problem solving and inhibitory control: cotton-top Tamarin (Saguinus oedipus) performance on a reversed contingency task. J Comp Psychol 116:39–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshminarayanan V, Chen MK, Santos LR (2008) Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:3837–3844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshminarayanan VR, Chen MK, Santos LR (2011) The evolution of decision-making under risk: framing effects in monkey risk preferences. J Exp Soc Psychol 47:689–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel W, Ebbesen EB (1970) Attention in delay of gratification. J Pers Soc Psychol 16:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray EA, Kralik JD, Wise SP (2005) Learning to inhibit prepotent responses: successful performance by rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta, on the reversed-contingency task. Anim Behav 69:991–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roma PG, Silberberg A, Ruggiero AM, Suomi SJ (2006) Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion and the frustration effect. J Comp Psychol 120:67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosati AG, Stevens JR, Hare B, Hauser MD (2007) The evolutionary origins of human patience: temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobo and human adults. Curr Biol 17(19):1663–1668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shifferman EM (2009) Its own reward: lessons to be drawn from the reversed-reward contingency paradigm. Anim Cogn 12:547–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shumaker RW, Palkovitch AM, Beck BB, Guagnano GA, Morowitz (2001) Spontaneous use of magnitude discrimination and ordination by the orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 15:385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg A, Fujita K (1996) Pointing at smaller food amounts in analogue of Boysen and Berntson’s (1995) procedure. J Exp Anal Behav 66:143–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg A, Kearns D (2009) Memory for the order of briefly presented numerals in humans as a function of practice. Anim Cogn 12:405–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg A, Roma PG, Huntsberry ME, Warren-Boulton FR, Sakagami T, Ruggiero AM, Suomi SJ (2008) On loss aversion in capuchin monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav 89:145–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg A, Crescimbene L, Addessi E, Anderson JR, Visalberghi E (2009) Does inequity aversion depend on a frustration effect? A test with capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 12:505–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Silberberg A (2010) Rational maximizing by humans (Homo sapiens) in an ultimatum game. Anim Cogn 13:671–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vlamings PHJM, Uher J, Call J (2006) How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed-contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility. J Exp Psychol Anim B 32:60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten A, Byrne RW (1988) Tactical deception in primates. Behav Brain Sci 11:233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zentall TR (2000) Animal intelligence. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 197–215

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Christelle Gandon for her considerable help in conducting Experiment 1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Silberberg.

Appendix

Appendix

Control condition script

This is an experiment about decision-making, and will take no longer than 45 min. In the experiment you are going to be able to make a series of choices about food, and after each decision you can eat the food you choose. How much you receive will depend on the decisions that you make. This part of the experiment will take no longer than 31 min. At the end of the experiment you will be asked to complete a questionnaire. This questionnaire will take about 10 min to complete. Do you have any questions at this point?

In the test, you get to choose between a small, partially filled teaspoonful of yogurt, and a full teaspoonful of yogurt. I will ask you which of the options you prefer, and you can then answer verbally or by pointing at your choice. Once you have indicated your choice, I will say “you can now have the food”, and you can then eat the option you have chosen. Specifically what will happen is that both options will be in teaspoons. I will ask you which teaspoon you want, and once you answer I will remove the other one. Then I will say right away, “you can now have the food”. Each trial will consist of just one choice like this. The total number of trials was randomly predetermined, so the test could stop after any number of trials. Therefore, just choose according to your preferences when I actually ask you. There is no right or wrong way to do this task. Before we start the experiment there will be a practice period where you get to see how the procedure works and experience both options. This practice period can then guide your decisions when you choose between the two options. Do you have any questions at this point? Throughout the test, you must eat all of the yogurt before you can proceed to the next trial—that is, you have to eat it here during the test, and cannot take the it out of the test or save it for later. You can take as long as you’d like to eat the food and eat it in any way you’d like. That’s a glass of water that you should feel free to drink throughout the test if you get thirsty. Do you have any questions at this point? Before the actual test begins, if you are wearing a watch could you please remove it. Thank you. Now for the actual test, you will be eating the same food throughout the test. However you can choose beforehand what type of food you would like to eat. We have three different flavors of yogurt. OK, great. Now there’s going to be the practice period where you get to experience each option two times each. In this practice period I am going to set just one teaspoon in front of you, and then ask you how much is in the teaspoon (is it full or only partially full). Once you answer I will immediately say “you can now have the food”, and then you can consume your choice. Once you have experienced each option twice, I will tell you that the practice period is over and the actual test will begin. Do you have any questions at this point? Then we will begin with the practice period.

Unequal-trial-rate condition script

This is an experiment about decision-making, and it will take no longer than 45 min. In the experiment you are going to be able to make a series of choices about food, and after each decision you can eat the food you choose. How much you receive will depend on the decisions that you make. This part of the experiment will take no longer than 31 min. At the end of the experiment you will be asked to complete a questionnaire. This questionnaire will take about 10 min to complete. Do you have any questions at this point?

In the test, you get to choose between a small amount of yogurt, and a larger amount of yogurt. I will ask you which of the options you prefer, and you can then answer verbally or by pointing at your choice. Once I say “you can now have the food”, you can then eat the option you have chosen. Specifically what will happen is that both options will be in spoons. I will ask you which spoon you want. If you pick the smaller amount, I am allowed to give it to you immediately. However, if you choose the larger amount I am not allowed to give it to you until after a set period of time has passed. That is, if you chose the spoon with the smaller amount of yogurt, I will say right away, “you can now have the food”. But if you choose the yogurt with the larger amount, you will have to wait before I say “you can now have the food”. Each trial will consist of just one choice like this. The total number of trials was randomly predetermined, so the test could stop after any number of trials. Therefore just choose according to your preferences when I actually ask you. There is no right or wrong way to do this task. Before we start the experiment there will be a practice period where you get to see how the procedure works and experience both options receiving the smaller amount right away, and waiting for the larger amount. This practice period can then guide your decisions when you chose between the two options. Do you have any questions at this point?

Throughout the test, you must eat all of the food before you can proceed to the next trial—that is, you have to eat it here during the test, and cannot take the food out of the test or save it for later.

You can take as long as you’d like to eat the food and eat it in any way you’d like. Throughout the test, the smaller amount of yogurt will always be available immediately, and the larger amount will always be associated with the same delay. That’s a glass of water that you should feel free to drink throughout the test if you get thirsty. Do you have any questions at this point? (If you choose the larger amount, during the delay period I will sit at that table over there, and we are not allowed to talk to each other. Then when the delay finishes you can eat the food.) Before the actual test begins, if you are wearing a watch could you please remove it. Thank you. Now for the actual test, you will be eating the same food throughout the test. However, you can choose beforehand what type of food you would like to eat. We have different flavors of yogurt. Feel free to try these options before you decide. OK, great. Now there’s going to be the practice period where you get to experience each option two times each. In this practice period I am going to set just one spoon, and then ask you if it is a small amount or large amount. If the spoon is only partially filled, once you answer I will immediately say “you can now have the food”. But if the spoon has the larger amount, there will be a delay before I say you can eat it. Once you have experienced each option twice, I will tell you that the practice period is over and the actual test will begin. Do you have any questions at this point? Then we will begin with the practice period.

Equal-trial-rate condition script

This is an experiment about decision-making, and it will take no longer than 45 min. In the experiment you are going to be able to make a series of choices about food, and after each decision you can eat the food you choose. How much you receive will depend on the decisions that you make. This part of the experiment will take no longer than 31 min. At the end of the experiment you will be asked to complete a questionnaire. This questionnaire will take about 10 min to complete. Do you have any questions at this point?

In the test, you get to choose between a small amount of yogurt, and a larger amount of yogurt. I will ask you which of the options you prefer, and you can then answer verbally or by pointing at your choice. Once I say “you can now have the food”, you can then eat the option you have chosen. Specifically what will happen is that both options will be in spoons. I will ask you which spoon you want. If you pick the smaller amount, I am allowed to give it to you immediately. However, if you choose the larger amount I am not allowed to give it to you until after a set period of time has passed. That is, if you choose the spoon with the smaller amount of yogurt, I will say right away, “you can now have the food”. But if you choose the yogurt with the larger amount, you will have to wait before I say “you can now have the food”. Each trial will consist of just one choice like this. There will also be delay before the next trial begins. The duration of this delay may not be the same for both choices. That is, the delay following choice of the delayed food may differ in length from the delay to the next trial if you choice the food that is immediately available.

The total number of trials was randomly predetermined, so the test could stop after any number of trials. Therefore, just choose according to your preferences when I actually ask you. There is no right or wrong way to do this task. Before we start the experiment there will be a practice period where you get to see how the procedure works and experience both options (receiving the smaller amount right away, and waiting for the larger amount). This practice period can then guide your decisions when you chose between the two options. Do you have any questions at this point?

Throughout the test, you must eat all of the food before you can proceed to the next trial—that is, you have to eat it here during the test, and cannot take the food out of the test or save it for later.

You can take as long as you’d like to eat the food and eat it in any way you’d like. Throughout the test, the smaller amount of yogurt will always be available immediately, and the larger amount will always be associated with the same delay. There may be different delays until the next trial depending on how you have chosen. That’s a glass of water that you should feel free to drink throughout the test if you get thirsty. Do you have any questions at this point? If you choose the larger amount, during the delay period I will sit at that table over there, and we are not allowed to talk to each other. Then when the delay finishes you can eat the food. Before the actual test begins, if you are wearing a watch could you please remove it. Thank you. Now for the actual test, you will be eating the same food throughout the test. However, you can choose beforehand what type of food you would like to eat. We have different flavors of yogurt. Feel free to try these options before you decide. OK, great. Now there’s going to be the practice period where you get to experience each option two times each. In this practice period I am going to set just one spoon, and then ask you if it is a small amount or large amount. If the spoon is only partially filled, once you answer I will immediately say “you can now have the food”. But if the spoon has the larger amount, there will be a delay before I say you can eat it. Once you have experienced each option twice, I will tell you that the practice period is over and the actual test will begin. Do you have any questions at this point? Then we will begin with the practice period.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Genty, E., Karpel, H. & Silberberg, A. Time preferences in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) and humans (Homo sapiens). Anim Cogn 15, 1161–1172 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0540-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0540-8

Keywords

Navigation