Skip to main content
Log in

Aversive learning overcomes appetitive innate responding in honeybees

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite their miniature brain, honeybees have emerged as a powerful model for the study of learning and memory. Yet, they also exhibit innate responses to biologically relevant social signals such as pheromones. Here, we asked whether the bees’ developed learning capabilities allow them to overcome hardwired appetitive responses. Can they learn that attractant pheromones, that are not normally associated with a noxious stimulation in nature, predict the punishment of an electric shock? Immobilized honeybees were trained to discriminate two odorants, one that was paired with a shock and another that had no consequences. We measured whether they learned to produce aversive sting extension responses to the punished but not the non-punished odorant. One odorant was a neutral odor without innate value while the other was either an attractive pheromone (geraniol or citral) or an attractive floral odorant (phenylacetaldehyde). In all cases, bees developed a conditioned aversive response to the punished odorant, be it pheromone or not, and efficiently retrieved this information 1 h later. No learning asymmetries between odors were found. Thus, associative aversive learning in bees is strong enough to override preprogrammed responding, thus reflecting an impressive behavioral flexibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Bitterman ME, Menzel R, Fietz A, Schäfer S (1983) Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J Comp Psychol 97:107–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boch R, Shearer DA (1962) Identification of geraniol as the active component of the Nassanoff pheromone in the honey bee. Nature 194:704–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boch R, Shearer DA, Stone BC (1962) Identification of iso-amyl acetate as an active component of the sting pheromone of the honey bee. Nature 195:1018–1020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bos N, Guerrieri FJ, d’Ettorre P (2010) Significance of chemical recognition cues is context dependent in ants. Anim Behav 80:839–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouton ME (2007) Learning and behavior: a contemporary synthesis. Sinauer, Suderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunke E-J, Hammerschmidt F-J, Schmaus G (1992) Scent of roses—recent results. Flav Fragr J 7:195–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buttery RG, Kamm JA, Ling LC (1984) Volatile components of red clover leaves, flowers, and seed pods: possible insect attractants. J Agric Food Chem 32:254–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carcaud J, Roussel E, Giurfa M, Sandoz JC (2009) Odour aversion after olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex in honeybees. J Exp Biol 212:620–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coureaud G, Moncomble AS, Montigny D, Dewas M, Perrier G, Schaal B (2006) A pheromone that rapidly promotes learning in the newborn. Curr Biol 16:1956–1961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deisig N, Lachnit H, Giurfa M (2002) The effect of similarity between elemental stimuli and compounds in olfactory patterning discriminations. Learn Mem 9:112–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson HEM, Bergström G, Groth I (1990) Differences in floral fragrance chemistry between different parts of Rosa rugosa Thunb. (Rosaceae). Israel J Bot 39:143–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson HEM, Arroyo J, Bergström G, Groth I (1997) Interspecific variation in floral fragrances within the genus Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). Biochem Syst Ecol 25:685–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Free JB (1987) Pheromones of social bees. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M (2007) Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well. J Comp Physiol A 193:801–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Fabre E, Flaven-Pouchon J, Groll H, Oberwallner B, Vergoz V, Roussel E, Sandoz JC (2009) Olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex in honeybees: memory dependence on trial number, interstimulus interval, intertrial interval, and protein synthesis. Learn Mem 16:761–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrieri F, Schubert M, Sandoz JC, Giurfa M (2005) Perceptual and neural olfactory similarity in honeybees. PLoS Biol 3:e60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard ER, Marquis DG (1940) Conditioning and learning. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RE, Zahorik DM, Immler K, Zakon H (1978) Alterations of male sexual behavior by learned aversions to hamster vaginal secretion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92:85–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen JT, Tollsten L, Bergstrom LG (1993) Floral scents—a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by headspace techniques. Phytochemistry 33:253–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lunney GH (1970) Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: an empirical study. J Educ Meas 7:263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marfaing P, Rouault J, Laffort P (1989) Effect of the concentration and nature of olfactory stimuli on the probocis extension of conditioned honey bees Apis mellifica ligustica. J Insect Physiol 35:949–955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1985) Learning in honey bees in an ecological and behavioral context. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1999) Memory dynamics in the honeybee. J Comp Physiol A 185:323–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez J, Almeida L, Balderrama N, Giurfa M (1997) Alarm pheromone induces stress analgesia via an opioid system in the honeybee. Physiol Behav 63:75–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned reflexes: an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce JM (1997) Animal learning and conditioning: an introduction. Psychology Press, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SA, Simpson DM, Armstrong SD, Davidson AJ, Robertson DH, McLean L, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL (2010) Darcin: a male pheromone that stimulates female memory and sexual attraction to an individual male’s odour. BMC Biol 8:75. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-75

  • Roussel E, Carcaud J, Sandoz JC, Giurfa M (2009) Reappraising social insect behavior through aversive responsiveness and learning. PLoS One 4:e4197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoz JC, Pham-Delègue MH, Renou M, Wadhams LJ (2001) Asymetrical generalisation between pheromonal and floral odours in appetitive olfactory conditioning of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A 187:559–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaal B, Coureaud G, Langlois D, Ginies C, Semon E, Perrier G (2003) Chemical and behavioural characterization of the rabbit mammary pheromone. Nature 424:68–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer DA, Boch R (1965) 2-Heptanone in the mandibular gland secretion of the honey-bee. Nature 206:530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda K (1961) Classical conditioned response in the honey bee. J Insect Physiol 6:168–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Theis N (2006) Fragrance of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) attracts both floral herbivores and pollinators. J Chem Ecol 32:917–927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vergoz V, Roussel E, Sandoz JC, Giurfa M (2007) Aversive learning in honeybees revealed by the olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex. PLoS One 2:e288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver N, Weaver EC, Law JH (1964) The attractiveness of citral to foraging honeybees. Prog Rep Texas Agric Exp Sta 2324:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahorik DM, Johnston RE (1976) Taste aversions to food flavors and vaginal secretion in golden hamsters. J Comp Physiol Psychol 90:57–66

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Benoist Schaal and Raphael Jeanson for valuable comments on a previous version of the manuscript, and to Ilay Berke for help with part of the experiments. This work was supported by the French National Research Agency (Project ANR-BLAN08-3_337040; INSAVEL), the French Research Council (CNRS) and the University Paul–Sabatier.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which experiments were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Giurfa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roussel, E., Padie, S. & Giurfa, M. Aversive learning overcomes appetitive innate responding in honeybees. Anim Cogn 15, 135–141 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0426-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0426-1

Keywords

Navigation