Animal Cognition

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 259–268

Why do dogs (Canis familiaris) select the empty container in an observational learning task?

  • Krisztina Kupán
  • Ádám Miklósi
  • György Gergely
  • József Topál
Original Paper


Many argue that dogs show unique susceptibility to human communicative signals that make them suitable for being engaged in complex co-operation with humans. It has also been revealed that socially provided information is particularly effective in influencing the behaviour of dogs even when the human’s action demonstration conveys inefficient or mistaken solution of task. It is unclear, however, how the communicative nature of the demonstration context and the presence of the human demonstrator affect the dogs’ object-choice behaviour in observational learning situations. In order to unfold the effects of these factors, 76 adult pet dogs could observe a communicative or a non-communicative demonstration in which the human retrieved a tennis ball from under an opaque container while manipulating another distant and obviously empty (transparent) one. Subjects were then allowed to choose either in the presence of the demonstrator or after she left the room. Results showed a significant main effect of the demonstration context (presence or absence of the human’s communicative signals), and we also found some evidence for the response-modifying effect of the presence of the human demonstrator during the dogs’ choice. That is, dogs predominantly chose the baited container, but if the demonstration context was communicative and the human was present during the dogs’ choice, subjects’ tendency to select the baited container has been reduced. In agreement with the studies showing sensitivity to human’s communicative signals in dogs, these findings point to a special form of social influence in observational learning situations when it comes to learning about causally opaque and less efficient (compared to what comes natural to the dog) action demonstrations.


Dog Social learning Dog-human interaction Communicative signals 


  1. Bekkering H, Wohlschlager A, Gattis M (2000) Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Q J Exp Psychol A 53:153–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog–causal ape. J Comp Psychol 120(1):38–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buttelmann D, Carpenter M, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Encultured chimpanzees imitate rationally. Dev Sci 10(4):31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buttelmann D, Carpenter M, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) Rational tool use and tool choice in human infants and great apes. Child Dev 79:609–626CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter M, Akhtar N, Tomasello M (1998) Fourteen- to 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behav Dev 21:315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter M, Call J, Tomasello M (2002) Understanding ‘prior intentions’ enables 2-year-olds to imitatively learn a complex task. Child Dev 73:1431–1441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleveland A, Striano T (2007) The effects of joint attention on object processing in 4- and 9-month-old infants. Infant Behav Dev 30:499–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Csibra G, Gergely Gy (2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends Cogn Sci 13:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dijksterhuis A, Bargh JA (2001) The perception-behavior expressway: automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 33:1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erdőhegyi Á, Topál J, Virányi Zs, Miklósi Á (2007) Dog-logic: the restricted use of inferential reasoning in a two-way choice task. Anim Behav 74:725–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gácsi M, Győri B, Miklósi Á, Virányi Zs, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) Species-specific differences and similarities in the behaviour of hand raised dog and wolf puppies in social situations with humans. Dev Psychobiol 47:111–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gácsi M, McGreevy P, Kara E, Miklósi Á (2009) Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs. Behav Brain Funct 5:31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gergely G, Csibra G (2006) Sylvia’s recipe: the role of imitation and pedagogy in the transmission of cultural knowledge. In: Levenson S, Enfield N (eds) Roots of human sociality: culture, cognition and human interaction. Berg Publishers, Oxford, pp 229–255Google Scholar
  14. Gergely G, Bekkering H, Király I (2002) Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature 415:755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gergely G, Egyed K, Király I (2007) On pedagogy. Dev Sci 10:139–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grossmann T, Johnson MH, Lloyd-Fox S, Blasi A, Deligianni F, Elwell C, Csibra G (2008) Early cortical specialization for face-to-face communication in human infants. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275:2803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) The emotional reactivity hypothesis and cognitive evolution. Trends Cogn Sci 9:464–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Horner V, Whiten A (2005) Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Anim Cogn 8:164–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaminski J, Tempelmann S, Call J, Tomasello M (2009) Domestic dogs comprehend human communication with iconic signs. Dev Sci 12:831–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Király I (2009) The effect of the model’s presence and of negative evidence on infants’ selective imitation. J Exp Child Psychol 102:14–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Meltzoff AN (1988) Infant imitation after 1-week delay: long-term memory for novel acts and multiple stimuli. Dev Psychol 24:470–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Zs, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller HC, Rayburn-Reeves R, Zentall TR (2009) Imitation, emulation by dogs using a bidirectional control procedure. Behav Processes 80:109–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Moll H, Tomasello M (2007) How 14-and 18-month-olds know what others have experienced? Dev Psychol 43:309–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moll H, Richter N, Carpenter M, Tomasello M (2008) Fourteen-month-olds know what “We” have shared in a special way. Infancy 13:90–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nielsen M (2006) Copying actions and copying outcomes: social learning through the second year. Dev Psychol 42(3):555–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Timár-Geng K, Csányi V (2004) Preference for copying unambiguous demonstrations in dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 118:375–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Prato-Previde P, Marshall-Pescini S, Valsecci P (2008) Is your choice my choice? The owners’ effect on pet dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task. Anim Cogn 11:167–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Range F, Virányi Zs, Huber L (2007) Selective imitation in domestic dogs. Curr Biol 17:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Range F, Heucke SL, Gruber C, Konz A, Huber L, Zs Virányi (2009a) The effect of ostensive cues on dogs’ performance in a manipulative social learning task. Appl Anim Behav Sci 120:170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Range F, Horn L, Bugnyar T, Gajdon GK, Huber L (2009b) Social attention in keas, dogs, and human children. Anim Cogn 12:181–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid PJ (2009) Adapting to the human world: dogs’ responsiveness to our social cues. Behav Processes 80:325–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ricciardelli P, Baylis G, Drivera J (2000) The positive and negative of human expertise in gaze perception. Cognition 77:B1–B14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Riedel J, Schumann K, Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) The early ontogeny of human-dog communication. Anim Behav 73:1003–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rochat MJ, Serra E, Fadiga L, Gallese V (2008) The evolution of social cognition: goal familiarity shapes monkeys’ action understanding. Curr Biol 18:227–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwier C, van Maanen C, Carpenter M, Tomasello M (2006) Rational imitation in 12-month-old infants. Infancy 10:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Senju A, Csibra G (2008) Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Curr Biol 18:668–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Senju A, Johnson MH, Csibra G (2006) The development and neural basis of referential gaze perception. Soc Neurosci 1:220–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Szetei V, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2003) When dogs seem to loose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner. Appl Anim Behav Sci 83:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tennie C, Glabsch E, Tempelmann S, Brauer J, Kaminski J, Call J (2009) Dogs fail to copy intransitive actions in third party response facilitation tasks. Anim Behav 77:1491–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Teuscher C, Triesch J (2007) To each his own: the caregiver’s role in a computational model of gaze following. Neurocomputing 70:2166–2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tomasello M (2008) Origins of human communication. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomasello M, Haberl K (2003) Understanding attention: 12-and 18-month-olds know what is new for other persons. Dev Psychol 39:906–912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tomasello M, Kruger AC, Ratner HH (1993) Cultural learning. Behav Brain Sci 16:495–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Topál J, Csányi V (1994) The effect of eye-like schema on shuttling activity of wild house mice (Mus musculus domesticus)–context dependent threatening aspects of the eyespot patterns. Anim Learn Behav 22:96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á, Virányi Zs, Kubinyi E, Csányi V (2005) The effect of domestication and socialization on attachment to human: a comparative study on hand reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies. Anim Behav 70:1367–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Topál J, Byrne RW, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2006) Reproducing human actions and action sequences: “Do as I Do!” in a dog. Anim Cogn 9:355–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Topál J, Gergely Gy, Miklósi Á, Erdőhegyi Á, Csibra G (2008) Infants perseverative search errors are induced by pragmatic misinterpretation. Science 321:1831–1834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Topál J, Miklósi Á, Gácsi M, Dóka A, Pongrácz P, Kubinyi E, Virányi Zs, Csányi V (2009a) Dog as a complementary model for understanding human social behavior. Adv Study Behav 39:71–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Topál J, Gergely Gy, Erdőhegyi Á, Csibra G, Miklósi Á (2009b) Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves and human infants. Science 325:1269–1272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Virányi Zs, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Belényi B, Ujfalussy D, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of the human pointing gesture in young socialized wolves and dogs. Anim Cogn 11:373–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Warneken F, Tomasello M (2007) Helping and cooperation at 14 months of age. Infancy 11:271–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wood N, Glynn DD, Philips BC, Hauser M (2007) The perception of rational goal-directed action in nonhuman primates. Science 317(5843):1402–1405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Yoon JMD, Johnson MH, Csibra G (2008) Communication-induced memory biases in preverbal infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(36):13690–13695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krisztina Kupán
    • 1
  • Ádám Miklósi
    • 2
  • György Gergely
    • 3
  • József Topál
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Psychological Research, Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Department of EthologyEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Cognitive Development CentreCentral European UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations