Previous studies suggest that non-human animals can discriminate two different artworks (such as music or paintings) that were created by humans. However, such studies rarely examined whether those animals were reinforced by one artwork more than another. It has been shown that music composed by humans has both discriminative and reinforcing properties when played for Java sparrows. Here, we investigated the effects of another artistic medium in Java sparrows, namely paintings. The first experiment tested the reinforcing properties. Staying time at three painting categories—Japanese, cubist, and impressionist—was measured as an index of their reinforcing properties. The second experiment used operant conditioning to reveal the discriminative properties of the different artistic styles of such paintings. Results suggest that the paintings have both discriminative and reinforcing properties for Java sparrows. However, the reinforcing properties vary from individual to individual. This is the first report demonstrating reinforcing properties of visual artworks in non-human animals.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ahmad PJ (1985) Visual art preference studies: a review of contradictions. Vis Arts Res 11:100–107
Averbeck BB, Lee D (2004) Coding and transmission of information by neural ensembles. Trends Neurosci 27:225–230. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.02.006
Berlyne DE (1971) Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Bichot NP, Rossi AF, Desimone R (2005) Paraellel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4. Science 308:529–534. doi:10.1126/science.1109676
Chase AR (2001) Music discriminations by carp (Cyprinus carpio). Anim Learn Behav 29:336–353
Cook RG (2000) The comparative psychology of avian visual cognition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9:83–89. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00066
Drăgănoiu TI, Nagle L, Kreutzer M (2002) Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. Proc Biol Sci 269:2525–2531. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2192
Gordon DA (1951) Experimental psychology and cubist painting. J Aesthetics Art Critism 9:227–243
Hulse SH, Bernard DJ, Braaten RF (1995) Auditory discrimination of chord-based spectral structures by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). J Exp Psychol Gen 124:409–423
Humphrey NK (1972) ‘Interest’ and ‘pleasure’: two determinants of a monkey’s visual preferences. Perception 1:395–416
Kawabata H, Zeki S (2004) Neural correlates of beauty. J Neurophysiol 91:1699–1705. doi:10.1152/jn.00696.2003
McDermott J, Hauser MD (2007) Nonhuman primates prefer slow tempos but dislike music overall. Cognition 104:654–668. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.011
Okaichi Y, Okaichi H (2001) Music discrimination by rats. Jap J Anim Psychol 51:29–34
Otsuka Y, Yanagi J, Watanabe S (2009) Discriminative and reinforcing stimulus properties of music for rats. Behav Processes 80:121–127. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(99)00049-2
Poli M, Previde EP (1991) Discrimination of musical stimuli by rats (Rattus norvegicus). Internl J Comp Psychol 5:7–18
Redies C (2007) A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Spat Vis 21:97–117. doi:10.1163/156856807782753886
Reinert VJ (1957) Akustische Dressurversuche an einem indischen Elefanten. Z Tierpsychol 14:100–126
Rensch B (1957) Ästhetische Faktoren bei Farb-und Formbevorzugungen von Affen/Aesthetic factors in color and form preferences of pithecoids. Z Tierpsychol 14:71–99
Uy JAC, Patricelli GL, Borgia G (2001) Complex mate searching in the satin bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Am Nat 158:530–542. doi:10.1086/323118
Watanabe S (2001) Van Gogh, Chagall and pigeons: picture discrimination in pigeons and humans. Anim Cogn 4:147–151. doi:10.1007/s100710100112
Watanabe S (2002) Preference for mirror images and video image in Java sparrows (Padda oryzivora). Behav Processes 60:35–39. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00094-3
Watanabe S (2010) Pigeons can discriminate “good” and “bad” paintings by children. Anim Cogn 13:75–85. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0246-8
Watanabe S, Sato K (1999) Discriminative stimulus properties of music in Java sparrows. Behav Processes 47:53–57. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(99)00049-2
Watanabe S, Sakamoto J, Wakita M (1995) Pigeons’ discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso. J Exp Anal Behav 63:165–174. doi:10.1901/jeab.1995.63-165
Zeki S (1999) Inner vision: an exploration of art and the brain. Oxford University Press, London
This research was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows, 2009-2011, 21·55562.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Ikkatai, Y., Watanabe, S. Discriminative and reinforcing properties of paintings in Java sparrows (Padda oryzivora). Anim Cogn 14, 227–234 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0356-3
- Discriminative property
- Reinforcing property
- Java sparrows