Abstract
Spatial pattern learning permits the learning of the location of objects in space relative to each other without reference to discrete visual landmarks or environmental geometry. In the present experiment, we investigated conditions that facilitate spatial pattern learning. Specifically, human participants searched in a real environment or interactive 3-D computer-generated virtual environment open-field search task for four hidden goal locations arranged in a diamond configuration located in a 5 × 5 matrix of raised bins. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Pattern Only, Landmark + Pattern, or Cues + Pattern. All participants experienced a Training phase followed by a Testing phase. Visual cues were coincident with the goal locations during Training only in the Cues + Pattern group whereas a single visual cue at a non-goal location maintained a consistent spatial relationship with the goal locations during Training only in the Landmark + Pattern group. All groups were then tested in the absence of visual cues. Results in both environments indicated that participants in all three groups learned the spatial configuration of goal locations. The presence of the visual cues during Training facilitated acquisition of the task for the Landmark + Pattern and Cues + Pattern groups compared to the Pattern Only group. During Testing the Landmark + Pattern and Cues + Pattern groups did not differ when their respective visual cues were removed. Furthermore, during Testing the performance of these two groups was superior to the Pattern Only group. Results generalize prior research to a different configuration of spatial locations, isolate spatial pattern learning as the process facilitated by visual cues, and indicate that the facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues does not require coincident visual cues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biegler R, Morris RGM (1993) Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning. Nature 361:631–633
Biegler R, Morris RGM (1996) Landmark stability: further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning. Q J Exp Psychol 49B:307–345
Brown MF (2006a) Abstracting spatial relations among goal locations. In: Brown MF, Cook RG (eds) Animal spatial cognition: comparative, neural, and computational approaches. http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/asc/brown/
Brown MF (2006b) Spatial patterns: behavioral control and cognitive representation. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford, New York, pp 425–438
Brown MF, Terrinoni M (1996) Control of choice by the spatial configuration of goals. J Exp Psychol Anim B 22:438–446
Brown MF, Wintersteen (2004) Spatial patterns and memory for locations. Learn Behav 34:391–400
Brown MF, DiGello E, Milewski M, Wilson M, Kozak M (2000) Spatial pattern learning in rats: conditional control by two patterns. Anim Learn Behav 28:278–287
Brown MF, Zeiler C, John A (2001) Spatial pattern learning in rats: control by an iterative pattern. J Exp Psychol Anim B 27:407–416
Brown MF, Yang SY, DiGian KA (2002) No evidence for overshadowing or facilitation of spatial pattern learning by visual cues. Anim Learn Behav 30:363–375
Burgess N (2006) Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends Cogn Sci 10:551–557
Chamizo VD (2003) Acquisition of knowledge about spatial location: assessing the generality of the mechanism of learning. Q J Exp Psychol 56B:102–113
Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition 23:149–178
Cheng K (2008) Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends Cogn Sci 12:355–361
Cheng K, Newcombe NS (2005) Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychon B Rev 12:1–23
Cheng K, Newcombe NS (2006) Geometry, features, and orientation in vertebrate animals: a pictorial review. In: Brown MF, Cook RG (eds) Animal spatial cognition: comparative, neural, and computational approaches. http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/asc/cheng/
Cheng K, Shettleworth SJ, Huttenlocher J, Rieser JJ (2007) Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychol Bull 133:625–637
DiGello E, Brown MF, Affuso J (2002) Negative information: both presence and absence of spatial pattern elements guide rats’ spatial choices. Psychon B Rev 9:706–713
Doeller CF, Burgess N (2008) Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning location relative to landmarks and boundaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:5909–5914
Doeller CF, King JA, Burgess N (2008) Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:5915–5920
Durlach PJ, Rescorla RA (1980) Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: an analysis in terms of within-compound associations. J Exp Psychol Anim B 6:175–187
Ellmore TM, McNaughton BL (2004) Human path integration by optic flow. Spat Cogn Comput 4:255–272
Etienne AS, Berlie J, Georgakopoulos J, Maurer R (1998) Role of dead reckoning in navigation. In: Healy S (ed) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford, New York, pp 54–68
Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge
Graham M, Good MA, McGregor A, Pearce JM (2006) Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape. J Exp Psychol Anim B 32:44–59
Horne MR, Pearce JM (2009) Between-cue associations influence searching for a hidden goal in an environment with a distinctive shape. J Exp Psychol Anim B 35:99–107
Jeffrey KJ (1998) Learning of landmark stability and instability by hippocampal place cells. Neuropharmacology 37:677–687
Kearns MJ, Warren WH, Duchon AP, Tarr M (2002) Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception 31:349–374
Kelly DM, Gibson BM (2007) Spatial navigation: spatial learning in real and virtual environments. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 2:111–124
Klatzky RL, Loomis JM, Beall AC, Chance SS, Golledge RG (1998) Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychol Sci 9:293–298
Learmonth AE, Newcombe NS, Huttenlocher J (2001) Toddlers’ use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. J Exp Child Psychol 80:225–244
McNamara TP, Valiquette CM (2004) Remembering where things are. In: Allen GL (ed) Human spatial memory: remembering where. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 3–24
Miller NY (2009) Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning. Behav Process 80:306–313
Miller NY, Shettleworth SJ (2007) Learning about environmental geometry: an associative model. J Exp Psychol Anim B 33:191–212
Montello DR, Waller D, Hegarty M, Richardson AE (2004) Spatial memory of real environments, virtual environments, and maps. In: Allen G (ed) Human spatial memory: remembering where. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 251–285
Mou W, McNamara TP (2002) Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Learn 28:162–170
Nardini M, Jones P, Bedford R, Braddick O (2008) Development of cue integration in human navigation. Curr Biol 18:689–693
Newcombe NS, Ratliff KR (2007) Explaining the development of spatial reorientation: modularity-plus-language versus the emergence of adaptive combination. In: Plumert JM, Spencer JP (eds) The emerging spatial mind. Oxford, New York, pp 53–76
Nico D, Israёl I, Berthoz A (2002) Interaction of visual and ideothetic information in a path completion task. Exp Brain Res 146:379–382
Pearce JM, Graham M, Good MA, Jones PM, McGregor A (2006) Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment. J Exp Psychol Anim B 32:201–214
Plumert JM, Spencer JP (2007) The emerging spatial mind. Oxford, New York
Ratliff KR, Newcombe NS (2008) Reorienting when cues conflict: evidence for an adaptive combination view. Psychol Sci 19:1301–1307
Rescorla RA, Durlach P (1981) Within-event learning in Pavlovian conditioning. In: Spear NE, Miller RR (eds) Information processing in animals: memory mechanisms. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 81–111
Richardson AE, Montello D, Hegarty M (1999) Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps, and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Mem Cogn 27:741–750
Shelton AL, McNamara TP (2001) Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cogn Psychol 43:274–310
Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford, New York
Sturz BR, Kelly DM (2009) Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans. Behav Process 82:223–227
Sturz BR, Bodily KD, Katz JS (2006) Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans. Anim Cogn 9:207–217
Sturz BR, Bodily KD, Katz JS, Kelly DM (2009a) Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: generality across real and virtual environments. Anim Cogn 12:237–247
Sturz BR, Brown MF, Kelly DM (2009b) Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning. Psychon B Rev 16:306–312
Uttal DH, Chiong C (2004) Seeing space in more than one way: children’s use of higher order patterns in spatial memory and cognition. In: Allen GL (ed) Human spatial memory: remembering where. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 125–142
Acknowledgment
This research was conducted following the relevant ethical guidelines for human research and was supported by an Alzheimer Society of Canada Grant to DMK. We thank Paul Cooke, Randi Dickinson, Stephanie Diemer, Roxanne Dowd, Karen Gwillim, Jenny Lee, Jason Lukich and Martha Forloines for their assistance with data collection and scoring. We would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sturz, B.R., Kelly, D.M. & Brown, M.F. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations. Anim Cogn 13, 341–349 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0283-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0283-3