How horses (Equus caballus) see the world: humans as significant “objects”
- 951 Downloads
This study aimed to determine whether horses have a kind of memory of humans (based on previous interactions), leading to a general significance of humans revealed by their reactions to humans in subsequent interactions. Subjects were 59 adult horses used to interact daily with humans. Three types of behavioural tests involving an unknown experimenter evaluated three possibly different memorized types of human–animal interactions (not work-related, using work-related objects, unfamiliar working task). We also performed standardized observations of routine interactions between each horse and its familiar handler (caretaker). To get a broad overview of the horses’ reactions to humans, we recorded both investigative and aggressive behaviours during the tests, representing respectively a “positive” and a “negative” memory of the relationship. Whereas correlations between tests revealed a general perception of humans as either positive or negative, unusual tests, i.e. that are not usually performed, elicited more positive reactions. Moreover, some horses reacted positively to a motionless person in their box, but negatively when this same person approached them, for example for halter fitting. Overall, aggressive reactions were more reliable indicators of the relationship than positive reactions, both between tests and between familiar and unfamiliar humans. Our results also show generalization of the perception of humans. These results support our hypothesis that perception of humans by horses may be based on experience, i.e. repeated interactions. Altogether, our results support the hypothesis that horses can form a memory of humans that impacts their reactions in subsequent interactions.
KeywordsHuman–horse interactions Significance of humans Aggressiveness Work-related context
The authors are grateful to M. S. Gicqueau and the “Lycée agricole La Touche”, Mrs C. Dufeu and the “Lycée agricole de Laval” and M. F. Reyé and the “CFA de Pommerit Jaudy” for allowing us to work with their horses and all the staff for their help and understanding. We also thank Aurore Chartier for her help with data collection. The authors are grateful to Ann Cloarec for correcting the English of this manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the Caisse Centrale de la Mutualité Sociale Agricole. Experiments comply with the current French laws related to animal experimentation.
- Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1990) How Monkeys See the World. University of Chicago press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Hinde R (1979) Towards understanding relationships. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- McGreevy P, McLean A (2005) Behavioural problems with the ridden horse. In: Mills DS, McDonnell SM (eds) The domestic horse, the origins, development and management of its behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 196–211Google Scholar
- Miklósi Á, Pongrácz P, Lakatos G, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J Comp Psychol 119(2):179–186. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.179 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Siegel S, Castellan Jr NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- von Uexküll J (1965) Monde Animaux et Monde Humain, suivi de la Théorie de la Signification. Gonthier, ParisGoogle Scholar