Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 333–345 | Cite as

Spatial cognition in the gerbil: computing optimal escape routes from visual threats

  • Colin G. EllardEmail author
  • Meghan C. Eller
Original Paper

Abstract

Previous studies in our laboratory have shown that when presented with a sudden stimulus simulating an oncoming predator, Mongolian gerbils can compute the optimal trajectory to a safe refuge, taking into account the position of the threat, the location of a clearly visible refuge, and several other contextual variables as well. In the present studies, the main goal was to explore the abilities of gerbils to use mental representations of spaces that were visually occluded by opaque barriers to compute efficient escape trajectories. In all studies, gerbils were placed into a round open field containing a single refuge. On each trial, an overhead visual stimulus was caused to ‘fly’ overhead, eliciting robust escape movements from the gerbils. By manipulating the shape and position of a series of opaque barriers that were interposed between the gerbils and the refuge, we were able to show that gerbils can compute the shortest route to an invisible target, even when the available routes to the target are made complex by using elaborate barrier shapes. These findings suggest that gerbils can maintain representations of their locations with respect to salient environmental landmarks and refuges, even when such locations are not continuously visible.

Keywords

Spatial cognition Predator avoidance Gerbil 

References

  1. Ågren G (1976) Social and territorial behaviour in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) under seminatural conditions. Biol Behav 1:276–285Google Scholar
  2. Ågren G, Zhou Q, Zhong W (1989) Ecology and social behaviour of Mongolian gerbils, Meriones unguiculatus, at Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia, China. Anim Behav 37:11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett AG (1996) Do animals have cognitive maps? J Exp Biol 199(1):219–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapuis N, Scardigl P (1993) Shortcut ability in hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus): the role of environmental and kinesthetic information. Learn Behav 21(3):255–265Google Scholar
  5. Collett TS (1982) Do toads plan routes? A study of the detour behaviour of Bufo viridis. J Comp Physiol A 146(2):261–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collett TS, Harkness LIK (1982) Depth vision in animals. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW (eds) Analysis of visual behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 111–176Google Scholar
  7. Clark MM, Galef BB (1979) A sensitive period for the maintenance of emotionality in Mongolian gerbils. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eilam D, Golani I (1989) Home base behavior of rats (Rattus norvegicus) exploring a novel environment. Behav Brain Res 34(3):199–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellard CG (1993) Organization of escape movements from overhead threats in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). J Comp Psychol 107(3):242–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellard C (1996) Laboratory studies of antipredator behavior in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): factors affecting response attenuation with repeated presentations. J Comp Psychol 110(2):155–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellard CG, Goodale MA (1988) A functional analysis of the collicular output pathways: a dissociation of deficits following lesions of the dorsal tegmental decussation and the ipsilateral colliculus efferent bundle in the Mongolian gerbil. Exp Brain Res 71(2):307–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellard CG (2008) You are here. Doubleday, New York (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Ellard CG, Shankar S (2001) Distance computation and spatial navigation in the gerbil: a comparison of contributions from open and closed loop movement control. In: Chen L, Zhuo Y (eds) Proceedings of the third international conference on cognitive science, Press of University of Science and Technology of China, Beijing, pp 29–34Google Scholar
  14. Fiset S, Doré FY (1996) Spatial encoding in domestic cats (Felis catus). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22(4):420–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallistel CR (1993) The organization of learning. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodale MA (1983) Neural mechanisms of visual orientation in rodents: targets versus places. In: Hein A, Jeannerod M (eds) Spatially oriented behavior. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 35–62Google Scholar
  17. Hemmi JM (2004) Predator avoidance in fiddler crabs: 1. Escape decisions in relation to the risk of predation. Anim Behav 69(3):603–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Healey S (1998) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Howland HC (1974) Optimal strategies for predator avoidance: the relative importance of speed and manoevrability. J Theoret Biol 47:333–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kramer DL, Bonenfant M (1997) Direction of predator approach and the decision to flee to a refuge. Anim Behav 54:289–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Menzel R, Gregger U, Smith A, Berger S, Brandt R, Brunke S, Bundrock G, Hülse S, Plümpe T, Schaupp F, Schüttler E, Stach S, Stindt J, Stollhoff J, Watzl S (2005) Honeybees navigate according to a map-like spatial memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(8):3040–3045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Müller M, Wehner R (1988) Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85(14):5287–5290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rydell J, Skals N, Surlykke A, Svenson M (1997) Hearing and bat defence in geometrid winter moths. Proc R Soc Lond B 254:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sherry DF (1998) The ecology and neurobiology of spatial memory. In: Dukas R (ed) Cognitive ecology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 261–296Google Scholar
  25. Tarsitano MS, Andrew R (1999) Scanning and route selection in the jumping spider Portia labiata. Anim Behav 58(2):255–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tchernichovski O, Benjamini Y, Golani I (1998) The dynamics of long-term exploration in the rat. Part I. A phase-plane analysis of the relationship between location and velocity. Biol Cybern 78(6):423–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thinus-Blanc C (1996) Animal spatial cognition: behavioural and brain approaches. World Scientific, HackensackGoogle Scholar
  28. Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55:189–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang RF, Spelke E (2002) Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends Cogn Sci 6(9):376–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Study Behav 16:229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations