Skip to main content

Relative quantity judgment by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)

Animal Cognition volume 12, pages 193–199 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

This study investigated whether Asian elephants can make relative quantity judgment (RQJ), a dichotomous judgment of unequal quantities ordered in magnitude. In Experiment 1, elephants were simultaneously shown two baskets with differing quantities of bait (up to 6 items). In Experiment 2, elephants were sequentially presented with baits, which could not be seen by elephants in their total quantities. The task of elephants was to choose the larger quantity in both experiments. Results showed that the elephants chose the larger quantity with significantly greater frequency. Interestingly, the elephants did not exhibit disparity or magnitude effects, in which performance declines with a smaller difference between quantities in a two-choice task, or the total quantity increases, respectively. These findings appear to be inconsistent with the previous reports of RQJ in other animals, suggesting that elephants may be using a different mechanism to compare and represent quantities than previously suggested for other species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Anderson US, Stoinski TS, Bloomsmith MA, Marr MJ, Smith AD, Maple TL (2005) Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young and old Western Lowland Gorillas. J Comp Psychol 119:285–295

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson US, Stoinski TS, Bloomsmith MA, Maple TL (2007) Relative numerousness judgment and summation in Young, middle-aged, and older adult Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus ablii and Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 121:1–11

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran M (2001) Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115:181–191

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beran M (2007) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) succeed on computerized test designed to assess conservation of discrete quantity. Anim Cogn 10:37–45

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran MJ, Beran MM, Harris EH, Washburn DA (2005) Ordinal judgments and summation of nonvisible sets of food items by two chimpanzees and a rhesus Macaque. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 31(3):351–362

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biro D, Matsuzawa T (2001) Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero. Anim Cogn 4:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1989) Numerical competence in a chimpanzee. J Comp Psychol 103:23–31

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen ST, Bernston GG (1995) Responses to quantity: perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). J Exp Psychol 21:82–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen ST, Bernston GG, Mukobi KL (2001) Size matters: impact of item size and quantity on array choice by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115:106–110

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Call J (2000) Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 114:136–147

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis H, Bradford SA (1986) Counting behavior by rats in a simulated natural environment. Ethology 73:265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis H, Perusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behav Brain Sci 11:561–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis H, MacKenzie KA, Morrison S (1989) Numerical discrimination by rats (Rattus norvegicus) using body and vibrissal touch. J Comp Psychol 103:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S (1997) The number sense. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Cohen L (1994) Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:958–975

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Dupoux E, Mehler J (1990) Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:958–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson L, Carey S, Hauser M (2002) The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychol Sci 13:150–156

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Gelman R (2000) Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals and integers. Trends Cogn Sci 4:59–65

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Carey S, Hauser LB (2000) Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proc Biol Sci 267(1445):829–833

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Kralik J, Botto-Mahan C (1999) Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus oedipus. Anim Behav 57:565–582

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Santos LR, Spaepen GM, Pearson HE (2002) Problem solving, inhibition and domain-specific experience: Experiments on cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus. Anim Behav 64:387–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks LH (1956) An analysis of number-concept formation in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Physiol Psychol 49:212–218

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irie-Sugimoto N, Kobayashi T, Sato T, Hasegawa T (2008) Evidence of means-end behavior in Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus). Anim Cogn 11:359–365

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Treisman A, Gibbs BJ (1992) The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cogn Psychol 24:174–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman EL, Lord MW, Reese TW, Volkmann J (1949) The discrimination of visual number. Am J Psychol 62:498–525

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi T, Hiraki K, Hasegawa T (2005) Auditory-visual intermodal matching of small numerosities in 6-month-old infants. Dev Sci 8(5):409–419

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie AM, Xu F, Tremoulet PD, Scholl BJ (1998) Indexing and the object concept: developing “what” and “where” systems. Trends Cogn Sci 2:10–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler G, Shebo BJ (1982) Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 111:1–22

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuzawa T (1985) Use of numbers by a chimpanzee. Nature 315:57–59

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meck WH, Church RM (1983) A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 9:320–334

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moyer RS, Landauer TK (1967) Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature 215:1519–1520

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olthof A, Roberts WA (2000) Summation of Symbols by Pigeons (Columba livia): The Important Number and Mass of Reward Items. J Comp Psychol 114:158–166

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg I (1987) Evidence for conceptual quantitative abilities in the African grey parrot: Labeling of cardinal sets. Ethology 75:37–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perusse R, Rumbaugh DM (1990) Summation in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Effects of Amounts, Number of Wells, and Finer Ratios. Inter J Primatol 11(5):425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plotnik JM, de Waal FBM, Reiss D (2006) Self-recognition in an Asian elephant. PNAS 103:17053–17057

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli DJ, Rulf AB, Landau KR, Bierschwale DT (1993) Self-recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Distribution, ontogeny, and patterns of emergence. J Comp Psychol 107(4):347–372

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Hegel MT (1987) Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 13:107–115

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1957) The Intelligence of Elephants. Sci Am 196:44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez SD, Gallup GG (1981) Self-recognition in Chimpanzees and Orangutans, but not Gorillas. J Hum Evol 10:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki K, Kobayashi T (2000) Numerical competence in rats (Rattus norvegicus): Davis & Bradford (1986) extended. J Comp Psychol 114(1):73–85

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terrell DF, Thomas RK (1990) Number-related discrimination and summation by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus sciureus and S. boliviensus boliviensus) on the basis of the number of sides of polygons. J Comp Psychol 104:238–247

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trick L, Pylyshyn ZW (1994) Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? : a limited capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychol Rev 101:80–102

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas R, Chase L (1980) Relative numerousness judgments by squirrel monkeys. Bull Psychon Soc 16:79–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Uller C, Carey S, Huntley-Fenner G, Klatt L (1999) What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge. Cogn Dev 14(1):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uller C, Hauser M, Carey S (2001) The spontaneous representation of number in a New World primate species, Cotton-top tamarins. J Comp Psychol 115(3):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian. Anim Cogn 6:105–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld E (1982) Subitizing: The role of figural patterns in the development of mumerical concepts. Archives de Psychologie 50:191–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn K (1998) Psychological foundations of number: numerical competence in human infants. Trends Cogn Sci 2:296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F, Spelke E (2000) Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 74:B1–B11

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the directors and keepers at Ueno Zoological Garden and Ichihara Elephant Kingdom, and their elephants for their participation in the study. We also like to thank Dr. Takafumi Ishida for his editorial support. These experiments comply with the current laws of Japan and the animals are kept at the standards established by Japanese Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Naoko Irie-Sugimoto, Tessei Kobayashi & Toshikazu Hasegawa

  2. NTT Communication Science Laboratories, NTT Corporation, Kyoto, Japan

    Tessei Kobayashi

  3. Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Takao Sato

Authors
  1. Naoko Irie-Sugimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tessei Kobayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Takao Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Toshikazu Hasegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoko Irie-Sugimoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Irie-Sugimoto, N., Kobayashi, T., Sato, T. et al. Relative quantity judgment by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Anim Cogn 12, 193–199 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0185-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0185-9

Keywords

  • Numerical cognition
  • Relative quantity judgment
  • Elephants