Skip to main content
Log in

The discrimination of discrete and continuous amounts in African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wealth of research in infants and animals demonstrates discrimination of quantities, in some cases nonverbal numerical perception, and even elementary calculation capacities. We investigated the ability of three African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) to select the largest amount of food between two sets, either discrete food items (experiment 1) or as volume of a food substance (experiment 2). The two amounts were presented simultaneously and were visible at the time of choice. Parrots were tested several times for all possible combinations between 1 and 5 seeds or 0.2 and 1 ml of food substance. In both conditions, subjects performed above chance for almost all combinations. Accuracy was negatively correlated with the ratio, that is performance improved with greater differences between amounts. Therefore, these results with both individual items and volume discrimination suggest that parrots use an analogue of magnitude, rather than object-file mechanisms to quantify items and substances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addessi E, Crescimbene L, Visalberghi E (2008) Food and token quantity discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0111-6

  • Agrillo C, Dadda M (2007) Discrimination of the larger shoal in the poeciliid fish Girardinus falcatus. Ethol Ecol Evol 19:145–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrillo C, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2007) Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 10:63–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson US, Stoinski TS, Bloomsmith MA, Marr MJ, Smith A, Maple TL (2005) Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young and old western lowland gorillas. J Comp Psychol 119:285–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barner D, Wood J, Hauser M, Carey S (2008) Evidence for a non-linguistic distinction between singular and plural sets in rhesus monkeys. Cognition 107:603–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barth H, Kanwisher N, Spelke E (2003) The construction of large number representations in adults. Cognition 86:201–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beran MJ (2001) Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115:181–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beran MJ (2004) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond to nonvisible sets after one-by-one addition and removal of items. J Comp Psychol 118:25–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beran MJ, Beran MM (2004) Chimpanzees remember the results of one-by-one addition of food items to sets over extended time periods. Psychol Sci 15:94–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon EM, Wusthoff CJ, Gallistel CR, Gibbon J (2001) Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychol Sci 12:238–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Call J (2000) Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 114:136–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cantlon JF, Brannon EM (2006) Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans. Psychol Sci 17:401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell W, Quinn JL (2004) Faced with a choice, sparrowhawks more often attack the more vulnerable prey group. Oikos 104:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery NJ, Clayton DH (2004) Comparing the complex cognition of birds and primates. In: Rogers LJ, Kaplan G (eds) Comparative vertebrate cognition: are primates superior to non-primates?. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerton J (2001) Birds’ judgments of number and quantity. In: Cook RG (ed) Avian visual cognition. Retrieved 17 March 2007. from http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/emmerton/

  • Emmerton J, Renner JC (2006) Scalar effects in the visual discrimination of numerosity by pigeons. Learn Behav 34:176–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson L, Carey S (2003) Tracking individuals via object files: evidence from infants’ manual search. Dev Sci 6:568–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson L, Carey S, Hauser MD (2002) The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychol Sci 13:150–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flombaum JI, Junge JA, Hauser MD (2005) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) spontaneously compute addition operations over large numbers. Cognition 97:315–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Gelman R (2000) Non-verbal numerical cognition: from the reals to the integers. Trends Cogn Sci 4:59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giret N, Miklósi A, Kreutzer M, Bovet D (2008) Use of experimenter given cues by African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus); Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0163-2

  • Hanus D, Call J (2007) Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus): the effect of presenting whole sets versus item-by-item. J Comp Psychol 121:241–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Carey S (2003) Spontaneous representations of small numbers of objects by rhesus macaques: examinations of content and format. Cogn Psychol 47:367–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Carey S, Hauser LB (2000) Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proc Biol Sci 267:829–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Tsao F, Garcia P, Spelke E (2003) Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton-top tamarins. Proc Biol Sci 270:1441–1446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan KE, Brannon EM (2006) A common representational system governed by Weber’s law: nonverbal numerical similarity judgments in 6-year-olds and rhesus macaques. J Exp Child Psychol 95:215–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian A, Yaman S, von Fersen L, Güntürkün O (2003) A bottlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity. Learn Behav 31:133–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen DM (2004) Alpha male black howler monkey responses to loud calls: effect of numeric odds, male companion behaviour and reproductive investment. Anim Behav 67:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis K, Jaffe S, Brannon E (2005) Analog number representations in mongoose lemurs (Eulemur mongoz): evidence from a search task. Anim Cogn 8:247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck SJ, Vogel EK (1997) The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390:279–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon BE (2003) Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 422:495–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • vanMarle K, Scholl BJ (2003) Attentive tracking of objects vs. substances. Psychol Sci 14:498–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • vanMarle K, Aw J, McCrink K, Santos L (2006) How Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella) quantify objects and substances. J Comp Psychol 120:416–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McComb K, Packer C, Pusey A (1994) Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo. Anim Behav 47:379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mix K, Huttenlocher J, Levine SC (2002) Quantitative development in infancy and early childhood. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olthof A, Iden CM, Roberts WA (1997) Judgments of ordinality and summation of number symbols by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 23:325–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1994) Numerical competence in an African gray parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 108:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1999) The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (2006a) Grey parrot numerical competence: a review. Anim Cogn 9:377–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (2006b) Ordinality and inferential abilities of a grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 120:205–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Brezinsky MV (1991) Acquisition of a relative class concept by an African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): discriminations based on relative size. J Comp Psychol 105:286–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Gordon JD (2005) Number comprehension by a grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), including a zero-like concept. J Comp Psychol 119:197–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pérusse R, Rumbaugh D (1990) Summation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): effects of amounts, number of wells, and finer ratios. Int J Primatol 11:425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos L, Barnes J, Mahajan N (2005) Expectations about numerical events in four lemur species (Eulemur fulvus, Eulemur mongoz, Lemur catta and Varecia rubra). Anim Cogn 8:253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova AA, Lazareva OF, Zorina ZA (2000) Use of number by crows investigation by matching and oddity learning. J Exp Anal Behav 73:163–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens J, Wood J, Hauser M (2007) When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Anim Cogn 10:429–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uller C, Carey S, Huntley-Fenner G, Klatt L (1999) What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge? Cogn Dev 14:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian. Anim Cogn 6:105–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward C, Smuts B (2007) Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Cogn 10:71–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson ML, Hauser MD, Wrangham RW (2001) Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? Anim Behav 61:1203–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood JN, Hauser MD, Glynn DD, Barner D (2008) Free-ranging rhesus monkeys spontaneously individuate and enumerate small numbers of non-solid portions. Cognition 106:207–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F (2003) Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition 89:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F, Spelke ES, Goddard S (2005) Number sense in human infants. Dev Sci 8:88–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zorina ZA, Smirnova AA (1994) Relative numerousness judgments in pigeons and crows: the choice of the greater set of food items under the freefeeding situation (in Russian). Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat 44:618–621

  • Zorina ZA, Smirnova AA (1996) Quantitative evaluations in gray crows: generalization of the relative attribute “larger set”. Neurosci Behav Physiol 26:357–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Marie Monbureau and Sara-Jane Vick for their suggestions on how to improve the manuscript and Aurore Chartier for her help in conducting the experiments. We also thank Mathieu Amy, Julie Chebaux, Colette Désaleux, Violaine Garcia-Fernandez, Philippe Groué, Valériane Jouffroy, Philippe Lenouvel, Alexandre Lerch, Magali Pasteau for taking care of the parrots. Funding for this research was provided by the 6th PCRD Nest Pathfinder “What it means to be human”. The experiments comply with the French laws concerning animal care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Giret.

Additional information

Syrina Al Aïn and Nicolas Giret have equally contributed to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aïn, S.A., Giret, N., Grand, M. et al. The discrimination of discrete and continuous amounts in African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Anim Cogn 12, 145–154 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0178-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0178-8

Keywords

Navigation