Here we investigate the counting ability in honeybees by training them to receive a food reward after they have passed a specific number of landmarks. The distance to the food reward is varied frequently and randomly, whilst keeping the number of intervening landmarks constant. Thus, the bees cannot identify the food reward in terms of its distance from the hive. We find that bees can count up to four objects, when they are encountered sequentially during flight. Furthermore, bees trained in this way are able count novel objects, which they have never previously encountered, thus demonstrating that they are capable of object-independent counting. A further experiment reveals that the counting ability that the bees display in our experiments is primarily sequential in nature. It appears that bees can navigate to food sources by maintaining a running count of prominent landmarks that are passed en route, provided this number does not exceed four.
Counting Honeybee Cognition
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank Hong Zhu for assistance. Financial support was provided by the Royal Physiographic Society, the Swedish Research council (623-2004-2903) and the ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science (CE0561903).
Chittka L, Kunze J, Geiger K (1995) The influence of landmarks on distance estimation of honeybees. Anim Behav 50:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis H, Pérusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behav Brain Sci 11:561–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene S (1999) The number sense: how the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hauser M (2000) Wild minds: what animals really think. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar
Esch H, Burns JE (1996) Distance estimation by foraging honeybees. J Exp Biol 199:155–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Metherell BG, Nelson TR, Lanfear SAJ, Synes WS (2006) Not everything that counts can be counted: ants use multiple metrics for a single nest trait. Proc R Soc B 273:165–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 317–350Google Scholar
Gallistel CR, Gelman R (2000) Non-verbal numerical cognition: from the reals to integers. Trends Cogn Sci 7:307–314Google Scholar
Karban R, Black CA, Weinbaum SA (2000) How 17-year cicadas keep track of time. Ecol Lett 3:253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killian A, Yaman S, Von Fersen L, Güntürkün O (2003) A bottlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity. Learn Behav 31:133–142Google Scholar