Animal Cognition

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 683–689 | Cite as

Evidence for counting in insects

  • Marie DackeEmail author
  • Mandyam V. Srinivasan
Original Paper


Here we investigate the counting ability in honeybees by training them to receive a food reward after they have passed a specific number of landmarks. The distance to the food reward is varied frequently and randomly, whilst keeping the number of intervening landmarks constant. Thus, the bees cannot identify the food reward in terms of its distance from the hive. We find that bees can count up to four objects, when they are encountered sequentially during flight. Furthermore, bees trained in this way are able count novel objects, which they have never previously encountered, thus demonstrating that they are capable of object-independent counting. A further experiment reveals that the counting ability that the bees display in our experiments is primarily sequential in nature. It appears that bees can navigate to food sources by maintaining a running count of prominent landmarks that are passed en route, provided this number does not exceed four.


Counting Honeybee Cognition 



We thank Hong Zhu for assistance. Financial support was provided by the Royal Physiographic Society, the Swedish Research council (623-2004-2903) and the ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science (CE0561903).


  1. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2007) Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 10:63–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chittka L, Geiger K (1995) Can honeybees count landmarks? Anim Behav 49:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chittka L, Kunze J, Geiger K (1995) The influence of landmarks on distance estimation of honeybees. Anim Behav 50:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis H, Pérusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behav Brain Sci 11:561–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dehaene S (1999) The number sense: how the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Hauser M (2000) Wild minds: what animals really think. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Esch H, Burns JE (1996) Distance estimation by foraging honeybees. J Exp Biol 199:155–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Metherell BG, Nelson TR, Lanfear SAJ, Synes WS (2006) Not everything that counts can be counted: ants use multiple metrics for a single nest trait. Proc R Soc B 273:165–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 317–350Google Scholar
  10. Gallistel CR, Gelman R (2000) Non-verbal numerical cognition: from the reals to integers. Trends Cogn Sci 7:307–314Google Scholar
  11. Karban R, Black CA, Weinbaum SA (2000) How 17-year cicadas keep track of time. Ecol Lett 3:253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Killian A, Yaman S, Von Fersen L, Güntürkün O (2003) A bottlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity. Learn Behav 31:133–142Google Scholar
  13. Pepperberg IM (2006) Grey parrot numerical competence: a review. Anim Cogn 9:377–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roberts WA, Roberts S, Kit AB (2002) Pigeons presented with sequences of of light flashes use behavior to count but not to time. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 28:137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rugani R, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2007) Rudimental numerical competence in 5-day-old domestic chicks (Gallus gallus): identification of ordinal position. J Exp Psychol 33:21–31Google Scholar
  16. Si A, Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW (2003) honeybee navigation: properties of the visually driven ‘odometer’. J Exp Biol 206:1265–1273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M (1988) Spatial acuity of honeybee vision and its spectral properties. J Comp Physiol A 162:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Altwein M, Tautz J (2000) Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the ‘odometer’. Science 287:851–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Bidwell NJ (1997) Visually mediated odometry in honeybees. J Exp Biol 200:2513–2522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinerus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian. Anim Cogn 6:105–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Vladusich T, Hemmi J, Srinivasan MV, Zeil J (2005) Interactions of visual odometry and landmark guidance during food search in honeybees. J Exp Biol 208:4123–4135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. West RE, Young RJ (2002) Do domestic dogs show any evidence of being able to count? Anim Cogn 5:183–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wiese H (2003) Numbers, language and the human mind. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARC Centre for Excellence in Vision Science, Research School of Biological SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Cell and Organism BiologyLund UniversityLundSweden
  3. 3.Queensland Brain InstituteUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations