As a consequence of domestication, dogs have a special readiness for communication with humans. We here investigate whether a dog might be able to acquire and consistently produce a set of arbitrary signs in her communication with humans, as was demonstrated in “linguistic” individuals of several species. A female mongrel dog was submitted to a training schedule in which, after basic command training and after acquiring the verbal labels of rewarding objects or activities, she learned to ask for such objects or activities by selecting lexigrams and pressing keys on a keyboard. Systematic records taken during spontaneous interaction with one of the experimenters showed that lexigrams were used in an appropriate, intentional way, in accordance with the immediate motivational context. The dog only utilized the keyboard in the experimenter’s presence and gazed to him more frequently after key pressing than before, an indication that lexigram use did have communicative content. Results suggest that dogs may be able to learn a conventional system of signs associated to specific objects and activities, functionally analogous to spontaneous soliciting behaviors and point to the potential fruitfulness of the keyboard/lexigram procedure for studying dog communication and cognition. This is the first report to systematically analyze the learning of arbitrary sign production in dogs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anderson JR, Kuwahata H, Fujita K (2007) Gaze alternation during “pointing” by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus)? Anim Cogn 10:267–271
Call J, Brauer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117:257–263
Gácsi M, Miklósi A, Varga O, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention. Anim Cogn 7:144–153
Gácsi M, GyYri B, Miklósi Á, Virányi Z, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) Species specific differences and similarities in the behavior of hand raised dog and wolf puppies in social situations with humans. Dev Psychobiol 47:111–122
Gardner RA, Gardner BT, Cantfort TEV (Org.) (1989) Teaching sign language to chimpanzees. State University of New York, Albany
Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs ? Trends Cogn Sci 9:439–444
Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (1998) Communication of food location between human and dog (Canis familiaris). Evol Commun 2:137–159
Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636
Herman LM, Forestell PH (1985) Reporting presence or absence of named objects by a language-trained dolphin. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 9:667–668
Kaminski J, Call J, Fischer J (2004) Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for “fast mapping”. Science 304(5677):1682–1683
Leavens DA, Hostetter AB, Wesley MJ, Hopkins WD (2004) Tactical use of unimodal and bimodal communication by chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 67:467–476
Liebal K, Call J, Tomasello M, Pika S (2004) To move or not to move: How apes adjust to the attentional state of others. Interact Stud 5:199–219
Matsuzawa T (2003), The Ai project: historical and ecological contexts. Anim Cogn 6:199–211
McKinley J, Sambrook TD (2000) Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 3:13–22
Menzel CR (1999) Unprompted recall and reporting of hidden objects by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) after extended delays. J Comp Psychol 113:426–434
Miklósi APR, Topál J, Csányi V (2000) Intentional behaviour in dog–human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog. Anim Cogn 3:159–166
Miklósi A, Kubinyi E, Topal J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi N (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766
Miklósi APR, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us ? Anim Behav 67:995–1004
Molnár C, Pongrácz P, Dóka A, Miklósi A (2006) Can humans discriminate between dogs on the base of the acoustic parameters of barks? Behav Process 73:76–83
Pepperberg IM (2002) IN search of King Solomon’s ring: cognitive and communicative studies of grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Brain Behav Evol 59:54–67
Pongrácz P, Miklósi A, Dóka A, Csányi V (2003) Successful application of video- projected human images for signalling to dogs. Ethology 109:809
Premack D (1990) Words: what are they, and do animals have them? Cognition 37:197–212
Rossi A (2001) Adestramento inteligente. 5th edn. CMS, São Paulo
Rumbaugh DM (1977) Language learning by a chimpanzee: the Lana project. Academic, New York
Savage-Rumbaugh ES (1990) Language acquisition in a nonhuman species: implications for the innateness debate. Dev Psychobiol 23:599–620
Savage-Rumbaugh S, Murphy J, Sevcik R, Brakke K, Williams S, Rumbaugh D (1993) Language comprehension in ape and child. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 58 (3–4, Serial No. 233)
Savage-Rumbaugh S, Shanker SG, Taylor TJ (1998) Apes, languages and the human mind. Oxford University Press, New York
Savolainen P, Zhang YP, Luo J, Lundeberg J, Leitner T (2002) Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science 298:1610–1613
Skinner BF (1957) Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115:122–126
Terrace HS, Petitto LA, Sanders RJ, Bever TG (1979) Can an ape create a sentence? Science 206:891–902
Tomasello M (1999) The human adaptation for culture. Annu Rev Anthropol 28:509–529
Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, London
Tomasello M, Zuberbühler K (2002) Primate vocal and gestural communication. In: Bekoff M, Allen C, Burghardt G (eds) The cognitive animal: empirical and theoretical perspecitives on animal cognition. MIT, Cambridge, pp. 293–329
Vilá C, Savolainen P, Maldonado JE, Amorim IR, Rice JE, Honeycutt RL, Crandall KA, Lundeberg J, Wayne RK (1997) Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276:1687–1689
Virányi Z, Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklósi A, Csányi V (2004) Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus. Behav Process 66:161–172
Warden CJ, Warner LH (1928) The sensory capacities and intelligence of dogs, with a report on the ability of the noted dog “Fellow” to respond to verbal stimuli. Q Rev Biol 3:1–28
Yin S, McCowan B (2004) Barking in dogs: context specificity and individual specification. Anim Behav 68:343–355
We thank Dorothy Fragazy, Robert Young and Adam Miklósi for their careful reading of the manuscript and for valuable suggestions, Carine Savalli Redígolo for statistical assistance, and Daniel Gravian Gomes Santiago, Aline Borges do Carmo, Camila Razzante, Andreza Lustri, Arine Pellegrino, Paula Hiromi Itikawa, Maria Helena Truksa de Barros Machado for assistance in running sessions, and analyzing and discussing data. Special thanks are due to Daniela Ramos for help and support throughout the study. This study, which was supported by a CNPq grant to César Ades, complies with the current Brazilian laws regarding the use of animals in research.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Rossi, A.P., Ades, C. A dog at the keyboard: using arbitrary signs to communicate requests. Anim Cogn 11, 329–338 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0122-3
- Dog–human communication
- Arbitrary signs acquisition
- Keyboard use