Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated that mammals, birds and fish use comparable spatial learning strategies. Unfortunately, except in insects, few studies have investigated spatial learning mechanisms in invertebrates. Our study aimed to identify the strategies used by cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) to solve a spatial task commonly used with vertebrates. A new spatial learning procedure using a T-maze was designed. In this maze, the cuttlefish learned how to enter a dark and sandy compartment. A preliminary test confirmed that individual cuttlefish showed an untrained side-turning preference (preference for turning right or left) in the T-maze. This preference could be reliably detected in a single probe trial. In the following two experiments, each individual was trained to enter the compartment opposite to its side-turning preference. In Experiment 1, distal visual cues were provided around the maze. In Experiment 2, the T-maze was surrounded by curtains and two proximal visual cues were provided above the apparatus. In both experiments, after acquisition, strategies used by cuttlefish to orient in the T-maze were tested by creating a conflict between the formerly rewarded algorithmic behaviour (turn, response learning) and the visual cues identifying the goal (place learning). Most cuttlefish relied on response learning in Experiment 1; the two strategies were used equally often in Experiment 2. In these experiments, the salience of cues provided during the experiment determined whether cuttlefish used response or place learning to solve this spatial task. Our study demonstrates for the first time the presence of multiple spatial strategies in cuttlefish that appear to closely parallel those described in vertebrates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade C, Alwarshetty M, Sudha S, Suresh Chandra J (2001) Effect of innate direction bias on T-maze learning in rats: implications for research. J Neurosci Methods 110:31–35 DOI 10.1016/S0165-0270(01)00415-0
Benhamou S, Poucet B (1996) A comparative analysis of spatial memory processes. Behav Processes 35:113–126 DOI 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00060-7
Boal JG (1996) A review of simultaneous visual discrimination as a method of training octopuses. Biol Rev 71:157–190
Boal JG, Dunham AW, Williams KT, Hanlon RT (2000) Experimental evidence for spatial learning in octopuses (Octopus bimaculoides). J Comp Psychol 114(3):246–252
Boletzky SV (1972) A note on aerial prey-capture by Sepia officinalis (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Vie Milieu 23(1A):133–140
Budelmann BU (1994) Cephalopod sense organs, nerves and the brain: adaptations for high performance and life style. Mar Fresh Behav Physiol 25:13–33
Byrne RA, Kuba M, Griebel U (2002) Lateral asymmetry of eye use in Octopus vulgaris. Anim Behav 64:461-468 DOI 10.1006/anbe.2002.3089
Byrne RA, Kuba MJ, Meisel DV (2004) Lateralized eye use in Octopus vulgaris shows antisymmetrical distribution. Anim Behav 68(5):1107–1114 DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.11.027
Carman HM, Mactutus CF (2001) Proximal versus distal cue utilization in spatial navigation: the role of visual acuity?. Neurobiol Learn Mem 78:332–346 DOI 10.1006/nlme.2002.4062
Colombo PJ, Brightwell JJ, Countryman RA (2003) Cognitive strategy-specific increases in phosphorylated cAMP Response Element-Binding protein and c-Fos in the hippocampus and dorsal striatum. J Neurosci 23(8):3547–3554
Dudchenko PA (2001) How do animals actually solve the T maze?. Behav Neurosci 115(4):850-860
Franz MO, Mallot HA (2000) Biomimetic robot navigation. Robot Auton Syst 30:133–153 DOI 10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00069-X
Gibson BM, Shettleworth SJ (2005) Place versus response learning revisited: tests of blocking on the radial maze. Behav Neurosci 119(2):567–586 DOI 10.1037/0735-7044.119.2.567
Giurfa M, Capaldi EA (1999) Vectors, routes and maps: New discoveries about navigation in insects. Trends Neurosci 22:237–242 DOI 10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01406-X
Golledge RG (1999) Wayfinding behavior. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Hanlon RT, Messenger JB (1996) Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Healy S (1998) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jacobs LF (2003) The evolution of the cognitive map. Brain Behav Evol 62:128–139
Karson MA (2003) Simultaneous discrimination learning and its neural correlates in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (Cephalopoda: Mollusca). Doctoral dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Karson MA, Boal JG, Hanlon RT (2003) Experimental evidence for spatial learning in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). J Comp Psychol 117(2):149–155
Lehman RAW (1981) Lateralized asymmetry of behavior in animals at the population and individual level. Behav Brain Sci 4:28
López JC, Broglio C, Rodríguez F, Thinus-Blanc C, Salas C (1999) Multiple spatial learning strategies in goldfish (Carassius auratus) Anim Cogn 2:109–120 DOI 10.1007/s100710050031
Mather JA (1991) Navigation by spatial memory and use of visual landmarks in octopuses. J Comp Physiol A 168:491–497
Mather JA (1995) Cognition in cephalopods. In: Slater PJB, Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT (eds) Advances in the study of behavior vol 24. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US, pp 317–353
Messenger JB (1968) The visual attack of the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Anim Behav 16:342–357
Odling-Smee L, Braithwaite VA (2003) The influence of habitat stability on landmark use during spatial learning in the three-spined stickleback. Anim Behav 65:701–707 DOI 10.1006/anbe.2003.2082
O’Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Packard A (1972) Cephalopods and fish: the limits of convergence. Biol Rev 47:241–307
Packard MG, McGaugh JL (1996) Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 65(1):65–72 DOI 10.1006/nlme.1996.0007
Restle F (1957) Discrimination of cues in mazes: A resolution of the “place-vs-response” question. Psychol Rev 64:217–228
Sanders GD (1975) The Cephalopods. In: Corning WC, Dyal JA, Willows AOD (eds) Invertebrate learning vol 3. Plenium Press, New York, pp 1–101
Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ, Bisazza A (1999) Possible evolutionary origins of cognitive brain lateralization. Brain Res Rev 30(2):164–175 DOI 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00012-0
Walker JJ, Longo N, Bitterman ME (1970) The octopus in the laboratory. Handling, maintenance, training. Behav Res Methods Instrum 2(1):15–18
Wehner R, Lehrer M, Harvey WR (1996) Navigation: migration and homing, vol 199. Company of Biologists Limited, Cambridge
Wells MJ (1964) Detour experiments with octopuses. J Exp Biol 41:621–642
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. J. Lejeune for statistical advice and the staff of the C.R.E.C. for their technical assistance. This research was supported by a grant from the Ministère de la Recherche et de la Technologie to C.A. The experiments complied with the French animal testing laws.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alves, C., Chichery, R., Boal, J.G. et al. Orientation in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis: response versus place learning. Anim Cogn 10, 29–36 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0027-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0027-6