Abstract
Domestic chicks are capable of perceiving as a whole objects partly concealed by occluders (“amodal completion”). In previous studies chicks were imprinted on a certain configuration and at test they were required to choose between two alternative versions of it. Using the same paradigm we now investigated the presence of hemispheric differences in amodal completion by testing newborn chicks with one eye temporarily patched. Separate groups of newly hatched chicks were imprinted binocularly: (1) on a square partly occluded by a superimposed bar, (2) on a whole or (3) on an amputated version of the square. At test, in monocular conditions, each chick was presented with a free choice between a complete and an amputated square. In the crucial condition 1, chicks tested with only their left eye in use chose the complete square (like binocular chicks would do); right-eyed chicks, in contrast, tended to choose the amputated square. Similar results were obtained in another group of chicks imprinted binocularly onto a cross (either occluded or amputated in its central part) and required to choose between a complete or an amputated cross. Left-eyed and binocular chicks chose the complete cross, whereas right-eyed chicks did not choose the amputated cross significantly more often. These findings suggest that neural structures fed by the left eye (mainly located in the right hemisphere) are, in the chick, more inclined to a “global” analysis of visual scenes, whereas those fed by the right eye seem to be more inclined to a “featural” analysis of visual scenes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrew RJ (1991) The chick in experiment: techniques and tests. General. In: Andrew RJ (ed) Neural and behavioural plasticity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 6–11
Cerella J (1980) The pigeon’s analysis of pictures. Pattern Recogn 12:1–6
Corballis PM, Fendrich R, Shapley RM, Gazzaniga M (1999) Illusory contour perception and amodal boundary completion: evidence of a dissociation following callosotomy. J Cogn Neurosci 11:459–466
Deng C, Rogers LJ (1997) Differential contributions of the two visual pathways to functional lateralization in chicks. Behav Brain Res 87:173–182
Deng C, Rogers LJ (1998a) Organisation of the tectorotundal and SP/IPS-rotundal projections in the chick. J Comp Neurol 394:171–185
Deng C, Rogers LJ (1998b) Bilaterally projecting neurons in the two visual pathways of chicks. Brain Res 794:281–290
Deng C, Rogers LJ (2002a) Social recognition and approach in the chick: lateralization and effect of visual experience. Anim Behav 63:697–706
Deng C, Rogers LJ (2002b) Factors affecting the development of lateralization in chicks. In: Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ (eds) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 206–246
Deruelle C, Barbet I, Dépy D, Fagot J (2000) Perception of partly occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio). Perception 39:1483–1497
Dharmaretnam M, Andrew RJ (1994) Age- and stimulus-specific effects on the use of right and left eyes by the domestic chick. Anim Behav 48:1395–1406
Di Pietro NT, Wasserman EA, Young ME (2002) Effects of occlusion on pigeon’s visual object recognition. Perception 31:1299–1312
Forkman B (1998) Hens use occlusion to judge depth in a two-dimensional picture. Perception 27:861–867
Forkman B, Vallortigara G (1999) Minimization of modal contours: an essential cross-species strategy in disambiguating relative depth. Anim Cogn 2:181–185
Fujita K (2001) Perceptual completion in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia). Percept Psychophys 63:115–125
Funk MS (1996) Development of object permanence in the New Zealand parakeet (Cyanoramphus auriceps). Anim Learn Behav 24:375–383
Gross Y, Franko I, Lewin L (1978) Effects of voluntary eye movements on hemispheric activity and choice of cognitive mode. Neuropsychologia 17:653–657
Grossberg S, Mingolla E (1985) Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon colour spreading. Psychol Rev 92:173–211
Güntürkün O (1997) Avian visual lateralization: a review. Neuroreport 8:3–11
Güntürkün O, Hahmann U (1999) Functional subdivisions of the ascending visual pathways in the pigeon. Behav Brain Res 98:193–201
Hellmann B, Güntürkün O (1999) Visual field specific heterogeneity within the tectofugal projection of the pigeon. Eur J Neurosci 11:1–18
Hodos W, Macko KA, Bessette BB (1984) Near-field acuity changes after visual system lesions in pigeons. II. Telencephalon. Behav Brain Res 13:15–30
Kanizsa G (1979) Organization in vision. Praeger, New York
Kanizsa G, Renzi P, Conte S, Compostela C, Guerani L (1993) Amodal completion in mouse vision. Perception 22:713–721
Lea SEG, Slater AM, Ryan CME (1996) Perception of object unity in chicks: a comparison with human infant. Infant Behav Dev 19:501–504
Michotte A (1963) The perception of causality. Basic Books, New York
Michotte A, Thinés G, Crabbé G (1964) Les complements amodaux des structures perceptives. Publications Universitaires de Louvain, Louvain
Osada Y, Schiller PH (1994) Can monkeys see objects under condition of transparency and occlusion? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:1664
Pepperberg IM, Funk MS (1990) Object permanence in four species of psittacine birds: an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), an Illiger mini macaw (Ara maracana), a parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus), and a cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus). Anim Learn Behav 18:97–108
Plowright CMS, Reid S, Kilian T (1998) Finding hidden food: behavior on visible displacement tasks by mynahs (Gracula religiosa) and pigeons (Columba livia). J Comp Psychol 112:13–25
Pollok B, Prior H, Güntürkün O (2000) Development of object permanence in food-storing magpies (Pica pica). J Comp Psychol 114:148–157
Prior H, Güntürkün O (1999) Patterns of visual lateralization in pigeons: seeing what is there and beyond. Perception Suppl 28:22
Rashid N, Andrew RJ (1989) Right hemisphere advantages for topographical orientation in the domestic chick. Neuropsychologia 27:937–948
Regolin L, Vallortigara G (1995) Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Percept Psychophys 57:971–976
Rogers LJ (1980) Lateralization in the avian brain. Bird Behav 2:1–12
Rogers LJ (1995) The development of brain and behaviour in the chicken. CAB International, Wallingford
Rogers LJ (1996) Behavioral, structural and neurochemical asymmetries in the avian brain: a model system for studying visual development and processing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 20:487–503
Rogers LJ (2002) Advantages and disadvantages of lateralization. In: Rogers LJ Andrew RJ (eds) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 126–153
Rogers LJ, Deng C (1999) Light experience and lateralization of the two visual pathways in the chick. Behav Brain Res 98:277–287
Sato A, Kanazawa S, Fujita K (1997) Perception of objects unity in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Jpn Psychol Res 39:191–199
Sekuler AB, Lee JAJ, Shettleworth SJ (1996) Pigeons do not complete partly occluded figures. Perception 25:1109–1120
Shipley TF, Kellman PJ (1992) Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length. Percept Psychophys 52:97–106
Tommasi L, Vallortigara G (2001) Encoding of geometric and landmark information in the left and right hemispheres of the avian brain. Behav Neurosci 115:602–613
Tommasi L, Andrew RJ, Vallortigara G (2000) Eye use in search is determined by the nature of the task in the domestic chick. Behav Brain Res 112:119–126
Vallortigara G (1992) Right hemisphere advantage for social recognition in the chick. Neuropsychologia 30:761–768
Vallortigara G (2000) Comparative neuropsychology of the dual brain: a stroll through left and right animals’ perceptual worlds. Brain Lang 73:189–219
Vallortigara G (2004) Comparative vertebrate cognition: are primates superior to non-primates. In: Rogers LJ, Kaplan G (eds) Vertebrate comparative cognition: are primates special? Plenum, New York, (in press)
Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (1991) Lateralization of response by chicks to change a model partner. Anim Behav 41:187–194
Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (1994) Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick. Behav Process 33:41–58
Vallortigara G, Regolin L, Bortolomiol G, Tommasi L (1996) Lateral asymmetries due to preference in eye use during visual discrimination learning in chicks. Behav Brain Res 74:135–143
Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ, Bisazza A (1999) Possible evolutionary origins of cognitive brain lateralization. Brain Res Rev 30:164–175
Vallortigara G, Cozzutti C, Tommasi L, Rogers LJ (2001) How birds use their eyes: opposite left-right specialisation for the lateral and frontal visual hemifield in the domestic chick. Curr Biol 11:29–33
Watanabe S, Ito Y (1991) Discrimination of individuals in pigeons. Bird Behav 9:20–29
Acknowledgements
The experiments comply with the current Italian and European Community laws for the ethical treatment of animals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Regolin, L., Marconato, F. & Vallortigara, G. Hemispheric differences in the recognition of partly occluded objects by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Anim Cogn 7, 162–170 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004-0208-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004-0208-0