Animal Cognition

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 69–76 | Cite as

Leading a conspecific away from food in ravens (Corvus corax)?

Original Article

Abstract

Active misleading of conspecifics has been described as a social strategy mainly for primates. Here we report a raven leading a competitor away from food in a social foraging task. Four individuals had to search and compete for hidden food at color-marked clusters of artificial food caches. At the beginning of the experiment, a subordinate male found and exploited the majority of the food. As a result, the dominant male displaced him from the already opened boxes. The subordinate male then developed a pattern, when the loss of reward to the dominant got high, of moving to unrewarded clusters and opening boxes there. This diversion often led the dominant to approach those unrewarded clusters and the subordinate then had a head start for exploiting the rewarded boxes. Subsequently, however, the dominant male learned not to follow the subordinate to unrewarded clusters and eventually started searching for the reward himself. These interactions between the two males illustrate the ravens' potential for deceptively manipulating conspecifics. We discuss under which circumstances ravens might use this capacity.

Keywords

Misleading Deception Raven Social foraging 

References

  1. Bernstein IS (1988) Metaphor, cognitive belief, and science. Behav Brain Sci 11:247–248Google Scholar
  2. Bugnyar T, Kotrschal K (2002) Observational learning and the raiding of food caches in ravens, Corvus corax: Is it "tactical" deception? Anim Behav 64:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byrne RW, Whiten A (1985) Tactical deception of familiar individuals in baboons (Papio ursinus). Anim Behav 33:669–673Google Scholar
  4. Byrne RW, Whiten A (1990) Tactical deception in primates: the 1990 database. Primate Rep 27:1–101Google Scholar
  5. Byrne RW, Whiten A (1992) Cognitive evolution in primates: evidence from tactical deception. Man 27:609–627Google Scholar
  6. Call J, Tomasello M (1999) A nonverbal false belief task: the performance of children and great apes. Child Dev 70:381–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheney DL, Seyfarth R (1990a) Attending to behavior versus attending to knowledge: examining monkeys' attribution of mental states. Anim Behav 40:742–753Google Scholar
  8. Cheney DL, Seyfarth R (1990b) How monkeys see the world: inside the mind of another species. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Coussi-Korbel S (1994) Learning to outwit a competitor in mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus torquatus). J Comp Psychol 108:164–171Google Scholar
  10. Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1978) Animal signals: information or manipulation? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 282–309Google Scholar
  11. Deaner R (2000) An experimental study of deception in ringtailed lemurs (abstract). Am J Phys Anthropol Suppl 30:135Google Scholar
  12. Dennett DC (1988) The intentional stance in theory and practise. In: Byrne RW, Whiten A (eds) Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 180–202Google Scholar
  13. de Waal FBM (1992) Intentional deception in primates. Evol Anthropol 1:86–92Google Scholar
  14. Fritz J, Kotrschal K (1999) Social learning in common ravens, Corvus corax. Anim Behav 57:785–793Google Scholar
  15. Fujita K, Kuroshima H, Masuda T (2002) Do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) spontaneously deceive opponents? A preliminary analysis of an experimental food-competition contest between monkeys. Anim Cogn 5:19–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Galef BG Jr, Giraldeau L-A (2001) Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Anim Behav 61:3–15Google Scholar
  17. Giraldeau L-A, Caraco T (2000) Social foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  18. Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe. Patterns of behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  19. Güzeldere G, Nahmias E, Deaner R (2002) Darwin's continuum and the building blocks of deception. In: Bekoff M, Allen C, Burghardt GM (eds) The cognitive animal. Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 353–362Google Scholar
  20. Gwinner E (1965) Über den Einfluß des Hungers und andere Faktoren auf die Versteck-Aktivität des Kolkraben (Corvus corax). Vogelwarte 23:1–4Google Scholar
  21. Hare B, Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M (2000) Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim Behav 59:771–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2001) Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Anim Behav 61:139–151Google Scholar
  23. Hauser MD (1997) Minding the behaviour of deception. In: Whiten A, Byrnr RW (eds) Machiavellian intelligence II: extensions and evaluations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 112–143Google Scholar
  24. Hauser MD (2000) Wild minds. What animals really think. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Heinrich B (1999) Mind of the raven. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Heinrich B, Pepper J (1998) Influence of competitors on caching behavior in common ravens, Corvus corax. Anim Behav 56:1083–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Held S, Mendl M, Devereux C, Byrne RW (2000) Social tactics of pigs in a competitive foraging task: the "informed forager paradigm". Anim Behav 59:569–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Held S, Mendl M, Devereux C, Byrne RW (2002) Foraging pigs alter their behavior in response to exploitation. Anim Behav 64:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heyes CM (1993) Anecdotes, training, trapping and triangulating: do animals attribute mental states? Anim Behav 46:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heyes CM (1998) Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behav Brain Sci 21:101–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hirata S, Matsuzawa T (2001) Tactics to obtain a hidden food item in chimpanzee pairs (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 4:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Humphrey NK (1976) The social function of intellect. In: Bateson P, Hinde RA (eds) Growing points in ethology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 307–317Google Scholar
  33. Kabicher G (1996) Das Versteckverhalten von handaufgezogenen juvenilen Kolkraben (Corvus corax). Master's thesis, KLF Grünau, University of ViennaGoogle Scholar
  34. Krebs JR, Dawkins R (1984) Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 380–402Google Scholar
  35. Kummer H, Anzenberger G, Hemelrijk CK (1996) Hiding and perspective taking in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). J Comp Psychol 110:97–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Menzel EW Jr (1974) A group of young chimpanzees in a one-acre field: leadership and communication. In: Schrier AM, Stollnitz F (eds) Behavior of nonhuman primates, vol 5. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 83–153Google Scholar
  37. Mitchell RW (1986) A framework for discussing deception. In: Mitchell RW, Thompson NS (eds) Deception: perspectives on human and non-human deceit. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 3–10Google Scholar
  38. Mitchell RW, Anderson JR (1997) Pointing, withholding information, and deception in capuchin monkeys. J Comp Psychol 114:351–361Google Scholar
  39. Munn C (1986) Birds that "cry wolf". Nature 319:143–145Google Scholar
  40. Povinelli DJ (1993) Reconstructing the evolution of mind. Am Psychol 48:493–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Povinelli DJ (2001) On the possibilities of detecting intentions prior to understanding them. In: Malle B, Baldwin D, Moses L (eds) Intentionality: a key to human understanding. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 225–248Google Scholar
  42. Povinelli DJ, Eddy TJ (1996) What young chimpanzees know about seeing. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 61:3Google Scholar
  43. Povinelli DJ, Parks KA, Novak MA (1991) Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) attribute knowledge or ignorance to others? J Comp Psychol 105:318–325Google Scholar
  44. Premack D (1988) 'Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?' revisited. In: Byrne RW, Whiten A (eds) Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 160–179Google Scholar
  45. Premack D, Woodruff G (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci 1:515–526Google Scholar
  46. Ristau CA (1991) Aspects of the cognitive ethology of an injury-feigning bird, the piping plover. In: Ristau CA (ed) Cognitive ethology: the minds of other animals. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 91–126Google Scholar
  47. Schlittgen R, Streitberg BHJ (1995) Zeitreihenanalyse, 6th edn. Oldenbourg, MunichGoogle Scholar
  48. Semple S, McComb K (1996) Behavioral deception. Trends Ecol Evol 11:434–437Google Scholar
  49. Tate DP (1994) Observations on the nesting behavior of the common potoo in Venezuela. J Field Ornithol 65:447–452Google Scholar
  50. Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Tomasello M, Hare B, Agnetta B (1999) Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, follow gaze direction geometrically. Anim Behav 58:769–777Google Scholar
  52. Valone TJ (1989) Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation. Oikos 56:357–363Google Scholar
  53. Whiten A (1997) The Machiavellian mindreader. In: Whiten A, Byrne RW (eds) Machiavellian intelligence II: extensions and evaluations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 144–173Google Scholar
  54. Whiten A, Byrne RW (1988) Tactical deception in primates. Behav Brain Sci 11:233–273Google Scholar
  55. Woodruff G, Premack D (1979) Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: the development of deception. Cognition 7:333–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Konrad Lorenz Research StationGrünau 11Austria
  2. 2.Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition ResearchAltenbergAustria
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations