Abstract
The quality characteristics of commercial alcoholic beverages (yakju, diluted soju, and fruit wines) were evaluated by assessing pH, total acidity, acetaldehyde, SO2, and flavonoid content. pH level was the highest in diluted soju, and total acidity and flavonoid content were higher in fruit wines compared to others. SO2 was detected only in fruit wines, and the total SO2 content was higher in the order of white wine > red wine > plum wine. Acetaldehyde contents were different according to the type of alcoholic beverage and analytic method of titration, enzymatic, headspace-GC and OIV methods. In fruit wines, acetaldehyde contents were significantly different according to analytic method (p < 0.05), and acetaldehyde bound to SO2 affected its quantification, resulting in lower acetaldehyde contents assessed by titration and headspace-GC than enzymatic and OIV methods. Therefore, selection of an appropriate analytic method is important for quantification of acetaldehyde in alcoholic beverages.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson SF, Anderson D. Winemaking: Recipes, Equipment, and Techniques for Making Wine at Home. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. San Diego, USA. pp. 220–223 (1989)
AOAC. Official Method of Analysis. 17th ed. Method 950.05, Method 962.12. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA (2000)
CFR. Title 27- alcohol, tobacco, products and Firearms, 27CFR4.22(b)(1). USA Code of Federal Regulations, Washington DC, USA. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/27/4.22 (2017)
Chang EH, Jeong ST, Park KS, Yun HK, Roh JH, Jang HI, Choi JU. Characteristics of domestic and imported red wines. Korean J. Food Preserv. 15: 203–208 (2008)
Chung H, Yoon MK, Kim MH, Park SK, Lee JG, Kim YS. Volatile hazardous compounds in alcoholic beverages. J. Appl. Biol. Chem. 55: 141–148 (2012)
EC. Official Journal of the European Union. Commission Regulation (EC) No 606/2009, ANNEX I B. European Commission (2009)
Frankel EN, Kanner J, German JB, Parks E, Kinsella JE. Inhibition of oxidation human low density lipoprotein by phenolic substances in red wine. Lancet 341: 454–457 (1993)
Frivik SK, Ebeler SE. Influence of sulfur dioxide on the formation of aldehydes in white wine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 54: 31–38 (2003)
Huh CK, Lee JW, Kim YD. Fermentation and quality characteristics of yakju according to different rice varieties. Korean J. Preserv. 19: 925–932 (2012)
IARC. IARC Monograph on the Evaluation Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 71. International Agency for Research on Cancer, France (1999)
Jackowetz N, Li E, Mira de Orduña R. Sulphur dioxide content of wine: the role of winemaking and carbonyl compounds. Research news from Cornell’s viticulture and enology program. Res. Focus 3: 1–7 (2011)
Jin TY, Lee WG, Lee IS, Wang MH. Changes of physicochemical, sensory and antioxidant activity characteristics in rice wine, yakju added with different ratios of Codonopsis lanceolata. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 40: 201–206 (2008)
Kang BT, Yoon OH, Lee JW, Kim SH. Qualitative properties of wild grape wine having different aging periods. Korean J. Food Nutr. 22: 548–553 (2009)
Kim EK, Kim IY, Ko JY, Yim SB, Jeong YH. Physicochemical characteristics and acceptability of commercial low-priced French wines. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 39: 1666–1671 (2010)
Kim YJ, Song GC, Lee YH, Jang KH, Jeong ST, Cheong C. Fruit Wine: Science and Application. Soohaksa Company, Seoul, Korea. pp. 135–145 (2012)
Koh KH, Lee JH. Phenolic content and superoxide radical intensity of Korea wines. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 5: 338–342 (1996)
Lee DH, Jung JW, Lee YS, Seo JS, Park IT. Fermentation characteristics for preparation of distilled liquor made of mixed grains. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 46: 446–455 (2014)
Lee HR, Hwang IW, Ha HT, Chung SK. The antioxidant capacities of imported red wines (Cabernet Sauvignon) from US and Chile. Korean J. Food Preserv. 20: 608–613 (2013)
Lee SJ, Kwon YH, Kim HR, Ahn BH. Chemical and sensory characterization of Korea commercial rice wines (yakju). Food Sci. Biotechnol. 16: 374–380 (2007)
Lee SJ, Park CS, Kim HK. Sensory profiling of commercial Korean distilled soju. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 44: 648–652 (2012)
Lee SJ. Volatile analysis of commercial Korean black raspberry wines (bokbunjaju) using headspace solid-phase microextraction. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 46: 425–431 (2014)
Mataix E, Luque de Castro MD. Determination of total and free sulfur dioxide in wine by pervaporation-flow injection. Analyst 123: 1547–1549 (1998)
MFDS. Production of Food and Food Additives (Statistical Yearbook). Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, Korea (2016a)
MFDS. Korean Food Standards Codex. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, Korea (2016b)
Miljić U, Puškaš V, Vučurović V, Muzalevski A. Fermentation characteristic and aromatic profile of plum wines produced with indigenous microbiota and pure cultures of selected yeast. J. Food Sci. 82: 1443–1450 (2017)
Min YK, Lee MK, Yoon HS, Park HJ. Quality changes in jujube wine with heating temperatures. Food Eng. Prog. 1: 212–218 (1997)
Moon JS, Kong TI, Cheong C. Characteristics of fermentation and aging by different adding of brewing water in Korean traditional cheongju. J. Korea Acad. Industr. Coop. Soc .16: 5468–5475 (2015)
NTA. 5-9 Aldehyde. National Tax Agency, Tokyo, Japan. http://www.nta.go.jp/shiraberu/zeiho-kaishaku/tsutatsu/kobetsu/sonota/070622/pdf/05.pdf (2017)
OIV. Compendium of International Methods of Wine and Must Analysis (Volume 2). Method OIV-MA-AS315-01. International Organisation of Vine and Wine, Paris, France (2017)
Park YS, Lee YJ, Lee KT. Analysis of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in alcoholic beverage. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 35: 1412–1419 (2006)
Roh HI, Chang EH, Joeng ST, Jahng KY. Characteristics of fermentation and wine quality. Korean J. Food Preserv. 15: 317–324 (2008)
Roh SK, Song JS, Park KH. Alcohol fermentability of insam starch and characteristics of insam wine. Food Eng. Prog. 5: 43–51 (2001)
Satora P, Tuszynski T. Influence of indigenous yeast on the fermentation and volatile profile of plum brandies. Food Microbial. 27: 418–424 (2010)
Sheridan MK, Elias R. Reaction of acetaldehyde with wine flavonoids in the presense of sulfur dioxide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 64: 8615–8624 (2016)
Somers TC, Wescombe LG. Evolution of red wines II. An assessment of the role of acetaldehyde. Vitis 26: 27–36 (1987)
Song JC, Park HJ. Takju brewing using the uncooked germed brown rice at second stage mash. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 32: 847–854 (2003)
Timberlake CF, Bridle P. Interactions between anthocyanins, phenolic compounds, and acetaldehyde and their significance in red wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 27: 97–105 (1976)
Vine RP. Wine appreciation, 2th ed. Wiley, New York, USA. p. 101 (1997)
WHO. Global status report on alcohol and health. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2014)
Yoo KS, Kim JS, Jin Q, Moon JS, Kim MD, Han NS. Chemical analysis and sensory evaluation of commercial red wines in Korea. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 40: 430–435 (2008)
Yoo KS, Kim JE, Moon JS, Jung JY, Kim JS, Yoon HS, Choi HS, Kim MD, Shin CS, Han NS. Evaluation of a volatile aroma preference of commercial red wines in Korea: sensory and gas chromatography characterization. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 19: 43–49 (2010)
Yoo MA, Chung HK, Kang MH. Optimal extract methods of antioxidant compounds from coat of grape dreg. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 36: 134–140 (2004)
Yoon HS, Park JM, Park HJ, Jeong CW, Choi WI, Park JH, Kim SD. Quality characteristics of Korean domestic commercial white wines. Korean J. Food Nutr. 29: 538–546 (2016)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Daegu University Research Grant, 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, KS., Lee, JH. Acetaldehyde contents and quality characteristics of commercial alcoholic beverages. Food Sci Biotechnol 28, 1027–1036 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00564-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00564-1