Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of volatile organic compounds as markers of chicken breast spoilage using HS-SPME-GC/MS-FASST

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Food Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of naturally aerobically spoiled chicken breast at ambient temperature were analyzed to identify volatiles that can be used as spoilage markers. The headspace solid-phase micro-extraction (HS-SPME) technique coupled with gas GC/MS running in Fast Automated Scan/SIM Type (FASST) mode was applied using 4 SPME fibers of different polarity. All of fibers were able to detect the sulfides methanethiol (MeSH), dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), and dimethyl trisulfide (DMTS), the alcohols ethanol (EtOH), 1- and 2-butanol, and 1-butanol isomers, and free fatty acids (FFAs) in the range of C2 to C5. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that spoilage in chicken meat is 2-step process. Initially, an increase in amounts of alcohols and FFAs was observed (primary spoilage), followed by an increase in the sulfide content (secondary spoilage). The most promising volatile spoilage markers for chicken breast were EtOH and 3-methyl-1-butanol, followed by acetic acid (C2) and sulfides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexandrakis D, Brunton NP, Downey G, Scannell AGM. Identification of spoilage marker metabolites in Irish chicken breast muscle using HPLC, GC-MS coupled with SPME and traditional chemical techniques. Food Bioprocess Tech. 5: 1917–1923 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huis in’t Veld JHJ. Microbial and biochemical spoilage of foods: An overview. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 33: 1–18 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nychas GJ, Skandamis PN, Tassou CC, Koutsoumanis KP. Meat spoilage during distribution. Meat Sci. 78: 77–89 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. FAD (Food and Drug Administration). Recommendations of the United States Public Health Service Food Code. Available from http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM189448. pdf. Accessed Sep. 15, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gram L, Ravn L, Rasch M, Bruhn JB, Christensen AB, Givskov M. Food spoilage-interactions between food spoilage bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 78: 79–97 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balasubramanian S, Panigrahi S. Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) techniques for quality characterization of food products: A review. Food Bioprocess Tech. 4: 1–26 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arthur CL, Pawliszyn J. Solid phase microextraction with thermal desorption using fused silica optical fibers. Anal. Chem. 62: 2145–2148 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang Z, Yang MJ, Pawliszyn J. Solid-phase microextraction: A solvent-free alternative for sample preparation. Anal. Chem. 66: 844A–853A (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vas G, Vekey K. Solid-phase microextraction: A powerful sample preparation tool prior to mass spectrometric analysis. J. Mass Spectrom. 39: 233–254 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pawliszyn J. Theory of solid-phase microextraction. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 38: 270–278 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Watanabe A, Ueda Y, Higuchi M, Shiba N. Analysis of volatile compounds in beef fat by dynamic-headspace solid-phase micro-extraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Food Sci. 73: C420–C425 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lovestead TM, Bruno TJ. Detection of poultry spoilage markers from headspace analysis with cryoadsorption on a short alumina PLOT column. Food Chem. 121: 1274–1282 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sturza R, Sîrghi C, Vrîncean M, Böhme S. Comparison of analytical methods sensitivity for samples injection in the detection of compounds with flavouring potential of wines. The Annals of the University of Dunarea de Jos of Galati. Fascicle VI: Food Technol. 34: 9–17 (2010)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tománková J, Bořilová G, Streinhauserová I, Gallas L. Volatile organic compounds as biomarkers of the freshness of poultry meat packaged in a modified atmosphere. Czech J. Food Sci. 30: 395–403 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Senter SD, Arnold JW, Chew V. APC values and volatile compounds formed in commercially processed, raw chicken parts during storage at 4 and 13°C and under simulated temperature abuse conditions. J. Sci. Food Agr. 80: 1559–1564 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leroy F, Vasilopoulos C, Van Hemelryck S, Falony G, De Vuyst L. Volatile analysis of spoiled, artisan-type, modified-atmosphere-packaged cooked ham stored under different temperatures. Food Microbiol. 26: 94–102 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Xu X-l, Ouyang G-f, Zhou G-h. Changes in volatile compounds of traditional Chinese Nanjing water-boiled salted duck during processing. J. Food Sci. 71: S371–S377 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Y, Xu X-l, Zhou G-h. Comparative study of volatile compounds in traditional Chinese Nanjing marinated duck by different extraction techniques. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 42: 543–550 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schindler S, Krings U, Berger RG, Orlien V. Aroma development in high pressure treated beef and chicken meat compared to raw and heat treated. Meat Sci. 86: 317–323 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gianelli MP, Flores M, Toldrá F. Optimisation of solid phase microextraction (SPME) for the analysis of volatile compounds in dry-cured ham. J. Sci. Food Agr. 82: 1703–1709 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gorecki T, Yu X, Pawliszyn J. Theory of analyte extraction by selected porous polymer SPME fibres. Analyst 124: 643–649 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shirley RE, Mindrup RF. SPME-adsorption Versus Absorption: Which Fiber is Best for Your Application? Supelco. Sigma-Aldrich. Co., St. Louis, MO, USA. pp. 1–31 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ho CW, Wan Aida WM, Maskat MY, Osman H. Optimization of headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) for gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of aroma compound in palm sugar (Arenga pinnata). J. Food Compos. Anal. 19: 822–830 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lecanu L, Ducruet V, Jouquand C, Gratadoux JJ, Feigenbaum A. Optimization of headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) for the odor analysis of surface-ripened cheese. J. Agr. Food Chem. 50: 3810–3817 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia-Esteban M, Ansorena D, Astiasarán I, Ruiz J. Study of the effect of different fiber coatings and extraction conditions on dry cured ham volatile compounds extracted by solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Talanta 64: 458–466 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu A-N, Sun B-G, Tian D-T, Qu W-Y. Analysis of volatile compounds in traditional smoke-cured bacon (CSCB) with different fiber coatings using SPME. Food Chem. 110: 233–238 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nychas GJE, Tassou CC. Spoilage processes and proteolysis in chicken as detected by HPLC. J. Sci. Food Agr. 74: 199–208 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dalgraad P. Evaluation and prediction of microbial fish spoilage. PhD thesis, Danish Ministry of Fisheries, Lyngby, Denmark (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bruckner S, Albrecht A, Petersen B, Kreyenschmidt J. Characterization and comparison of spoilage processes in fresh pork and poultry. J. Food Quality 35: 372–382 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bruckner S, Albrecht A, Petersen B, Kreyenschmidt J. Influence of cold chain interruptions on the shelf life of fresh pork and poultry. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 47: 1639–1646 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ragaert P, Devlieghere F, Devuyst E, Dewulf J, Van Langenhove H, Debevere J. Volatile metabolite production of spoilage micro-organisms on a mixed-lettuce agar during storage at 7 degrees C in air and low oxygen atmosphere. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 112: 162–170 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ercolini D, Ferrocino I, Nasi A, Ndagijimana M, Vernocchi P, La Storia A, Laghi L, Mauriello G, Guerzoni ME, Villani F. Monitoring of microbial metabolites and bacterial diversity in beef stored under different packaging conditions. Appl. Environ. Microb. 77: 7372–7381 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Konn C, Charlou J-L, Donval J-P, Holm NG. Characterisation of dissolved organic compounds in hydrothermal fluids by stir bar sorptive extraction-gas chomatography-mass spectrometry. Case study: The rainbow field (36oN, Mid-Atlantic Ridge). Geochem. T. 13: 8 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Majcher MA, Goderska K, Pikul J, Jelen HH. Changes in volatile, sensory and microbial profiles during preparation of smoked ewe cheese. J. Sci. Food Agr. 91: 1416–1423 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kruger RL, Dallago RM, Filho Ido N, Di Luccio M. Study of odor compounds in gaseous effluents generated during production of poultry feather and viscera meal using headspace solid phase microextraction. Environ. Monit. Assess. 158: 355–363 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vasta V, Ratel J, Engel E. Mass spectrometry analysis of volatile compounds in raw meat for the authentication of the feeding background of farm animals. J. Agr. Food Chem. 55: 4630–4639 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun-Gyun Yuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mikš-Krajnik, M., Yoon, YJ. & Yuk, HG. Detection of volatile organic compounds as markers of chicken breast spoilage using HS-SPME-GC/MS-FASST. Food Sci Biotechnol 24, 361–372 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-015-0048-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-015-0048-5

Keywords

Navigation