Abstract
The level of antibiotic multiresistance of Campylobacter strains from chicken was evaluated and responses to the bactericidal effects of organic acids were analyzed. Strains (76) isolated from chicken were analyzed for resistance to antibiotics and acid shock. A high strain resistance to fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid) was observed, with cross resistance to both drugs in 41% of strains. A low resistance was observed for amoxicillin, erythromycin, and gentamicin. Campylobacter jejuni was the most resistant species. Antibacterial activities against multiresistant Campylobacter strains were observed using acetic, citric, and ascorbic acids at minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) ranging from 0.3 to 3 mg/mL. Acetic acid was the most efficient acid with the lowest MBC value. However, a contact time of 4 h was required for an efficient effect against Campylobacter contaminated chicken skin. Using organic acids in the poultry production chain can reduce propagation of antibiotic multiresistant strains of Campylobacter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ogden ID, Dallas JF, MacRae M, Rotariu O, Reay KW, Leitch M, Thomson AP, Sheppard SK, Maiden M, Forbes KJ, Strachan JC. Campylobacter excreted into the environment by animal sources: Prevalence, concentration shed, and host association. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 6: 1161–1170 (2009)
Allos BM. Campylobacter jejuni infections: Update on emerging issues and trends. Clin. Infect. Dis. 8: 1201–1206 (2001)
Ruiz J, Goni P, Marco F, Gallardo F, Mirelis B, Jimenez De Anta T, Vila J. Increased resistance to quinolones in Campylobacter jejuni: A genetic analysis of gyrA gene mutations in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates. Microbiol. Immunol. 42: 223–226 (1998)
Boonmar S, Sangsuk L, Suthivarakom K, Padungtod P, Morita Y. Serotypes and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from humans and animals in Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 36: 130–134 (2005)
Quinn T, Bolla MJ, Pages JM, Fanning S. Antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter: Could efflux pump inhibitors control infection? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59: 1230–1236 (2007)
Friedman CR, Neimann J, Wegene HC, Tauxe RV. Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrialized nations. pp. 121–138. In: Campylobacter. 2nd ed. Nachamkin, Blaser MJ (eds). ASM press, Washington, DC, USA (2000)
Wilson DJ, Gabriel E, Leatherbarrow AJH, Cheesbrough J, Gee S. Tracing the source of campylobacteriosis. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000203 (2008)
Gupta A, Nelson JM, Barrett TJ, Tauxe RV, Rossiter SP, Friedman CR, Joyce K, Smith K, Jones T, Hawkins M, Shiferaw B, Beebe J, Vugia D, Rabatsky-Ehr T, Benson J, Root T, Angulo F. Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter strains, Unites States, 1997–2001. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10: 1102–1109 (2004)
Cudjoe KS, Kapperud G. The effect of lactic acid sprays on Campylobacter jejuni inoculated onto poultry carcasses. Acta Vet. Scand. 32: 491–498 (1991)
Van Netten P, Huis J, Mossel DA. An in-vitro meat model for the immediate bactericidal effect of lactic acid decontamination on meat surfaces. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 76: 49–54 (1994)
Dickens JA, Whittemore AD. Effects of acetic acid and hydrogen peroxide application during defeathering on the microbiological quality of broiler carcasses prior to evisceration. Poultry Sci. 76: 657–660 (1997)
Chaveerach P, Keuzenkamp DA, Urlings HAP, Lipman LJA, van Knapen F. In vitro study on the effect of organic acids on Campylobacter jejuni/coli populations in mixtures of water and feed. Poultry Sci. 81: 621–628 (2002)
Chaveerach P, Huurne AAHM, Lipman LJA, van Knapen F. Survival and resuscitation of ten strains of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli under acid conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 711–714 (2003)
Goualié GB, Akpa EE, Kakou-N’Gazoa ES, Guessennd N, Bakayoko S, Niamké LS, Dosso M. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolated from chicken in Côte d’Ivoire. Int. J. Microbiol. doi: 10.1155/2012/150612 (2012)
Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45: 493–496 (1966)
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Testing: Twentieth Informational Supplement M100-S20. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA (2011)
Fletcher RD, Albers AC, Chen AK, Albertson JN Jr. Ascorbic acid inhibition of Campylobacter jejuni growth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45: 792–795 (1983)
Sirirak T, Voravuthikunchai SP. Eleutherine americana: A candidate for the control of Campylobacter species. Poultry Sci. 90: 791–796 (2011)
Kassa T, Gebre-Selassie S, Asrat D. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of thermotolerant Campylobacter strains isolated from food animals in Ethiopia. Vet. Microbiol. 119: 82–87 (2007)
Rahimi E, Momtaz H, Ameri M, Ghasemian-Safaei H, Ali-kasemi M. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter species isolated from chicken carcasses during processing in Iran. Poultry Sci. 89: 1015–1020 (2010)
Kim HJ, Kim JH, Kim YI, Choi J S, Park MY, Nam HM, Jung S-C, Kwon JW, Lee C H, Kim YH, Ku BK, Le YJ. Prevalence and characterization of Campylobacter spp. isolated from domestic and imported poultry meat in Korea, 2004–2008. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 7: 1203–1209 (2010)
Van Looveren M, Daube G, DE Zutter L, Dumont JM, Lammens C, Wijdooghe M, Vandamme P, Jouret M, Cornelis M, Goossens H. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Campylobacter strains isolated from food animals in Belgium. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48: 235–240 (2001)
Sáenz Y, Zarazaga M, Lantero M, Gastanares MJ, Baquero F, Torres C. Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from animals, foods and humans in Spain in 1997–1998. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 267–271 (2000)
Fernandez H, Mansilla M, Gonzalez V. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. Jejuni assessed by E-test and double dilution agar method in Southern Chile. Mem. I. Oswaldo Cruz 95: 247–249 (2000)
Ewnetu D, Mihret A. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolates from humans and chickens in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 7: 667–670 (2010)
Cardinale E, Dromigny JA, Tall F, Ndiaye M, Konte M, Perrier Gros-Claude JD. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter strains isolated from chicken carcasses in Senegal. Rev. Elev. Med. Vet. Pay. 55: 259–264 (2002)
Metcalf JH, Donoghue AM, Venkitanarayanan K, Reyes-Herrera I, Aguiar VF, Blore PJ, Donoghue DJ. Water administration of the medium-chain fatty acid caprylic acid produced variable efficacy against enteric Campylobacter colonization in broilers. Poultry Sci. 90: 494–497 (2011)
Rotimi VO, Egwari L, Akande B. Acidity and intestinal bacteria: An in-vitro assessment of the bactericidal activity of hydrochloric acid on intestinal pathogens. Afr. J. Med. Sci. 19: 275–280 (1990)
Waterman SR, Small PL. Acid-sensitive enteric pathogens are protected from killing under extremely acidic conditions of pH 2.5 when they are inoculated onto certain solid food sources. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 3882–3886 (1998)
Molatová Z, Skøivanová E, Macias B, Mcewan NR, Bøzina P, Marounek M. Susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to organic acids and monoacylglycerols. Folia Microbiol. 55: 215–220 (2010)
Eklund T. The antimicrobial effect of dissociated and undissociated sorbic acid at different pH levels. Appl. Bacteriol. 54: 383–389 (1983)
Salmond CV, Kroll RG, Booth IR. The effect of food preservative on pH homeostasis in Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130: 2845–2850 (1984)
Reezal A, McNeil B, Anderson JG. Effect of low-osmolality nutrient media on growth and culturability of Campylobacter species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 4643–4649 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goualié, B.G., Ouattara, H.G., Akpa, E.E. et al. Occurrence of multidrug resistance in Campylobacter from Ivorian poultry and analysis of bacterial response to acid shock. Food Sci Biotechnol 23, 1185–1191 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-014-0162-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-014-0162-9