Skip to main content
Log in

Sensory and hedonic perceptions of italian and korean subjects: a Cross-Cultural study of Perilla Frutescens

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Food Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences in perceptions of perilla by Korean and Italian subjects were analyzed. Descriptive analysis was used to verify how Italian assessors described the sensory properties of an unknown product. Italian subjects used the attributes grass, fennel, balsamic, and almond to describe the unfamiliar odor of perilla and perceived perilla as being bitter, astringent and as having a cooling and tingling effect. Projective mapping and hedonic testing were used to compare Italian and Korean subjects odor perceptions and acceptability. Napping results showed that both groups had similar odor perceptions, but Italian subjects tended to associate perilla with other odors whereas Korean subjects were able to specifically identify perilla. Also, Korean subjects generally gave low scores for perilla beverages, but not as low as Italian subjects, suggesting that familiarity plays an important role in food appreciation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ravindran PN, Shylaja M. Perilla. pp. 482–494. In: Handbook of Herbs and Spices. Peter KV (ed). Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, UK (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guo R, Pittler MH, Ernst E. Herbal medicines for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: A systematic review. Ann. Allerg. Asthma Im. 99: 483–495 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamamoto H, Ogawa T. Antimicrobial activity of perilla seed polyphenols against oral pathogenic bacteria. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 66: 921–924 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Banno N, Akihisa T, Tokuda H, Yasukawa K, Higashihara H, Ukiya M, Watanabe K, Kimura Y, Hasegawa J, Nishino H. Triterpene acids from the leaves of Perilla frutescens and their antiinflammatory and antitumor-promoting effects. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 68: 85–90 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ueda H, Yamazaki C, Yamazaki M. Inhibitory effect of Perilla leaf extract and luteolin on mouse skin tumor promotion. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 26: 560–563 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawahata T, Otake T, Mori H, Kojima Y, Oishi I, Oka S, Fukumori Y, Sano K. A novel substance purified from Perilla frutescens Britton inhibits an early stage of HIV-1 replication without blocking viral adsorption. Antivir. Chem. Chemoth. 13: 283–288 (2002)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamasaki K, Nakano M, Kawahata T, Mori H, Otake T, Ueba N, Oishi I, Inami R, Yamane M, Nakamura M, Murata H, Nakanishi T. Anti-HIV-1 activity of herbs in Labiatae. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 21: 829–833 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sawabe A, Satake T, Aizawa R, Sakatani K, Nishimoto K, Ozeki C, Hamada Y, Komemushi S. Toward use of the leaves of Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton var. Acuta Kudo (red perilla) with Japanese dietary pickled plum (Umeboshi). J. Oleo Sci. 55: 413–422 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassoli A, Borgonovo G, Caimi S, Scaglioni L, Morini G, Moriello AS, Di Marzo V, De Petrocellis LTaste-guided identification of high potency TRPA1 agonists from Perilla frutescens. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 17: 1636–1639 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Patapoutinan A, Tate S, Woolf CJ. Transient receptor potential channels: Targeting pain at the source. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 8: 55–68 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Galgani JE, Ryan DH, Ravussin E. Effect of capsinoids on energy metabolism in human subjects. Brit. J. Nutr. 103: 38–42 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Park MH, Seol NG, Chang PS, Yoon SH, Lee JH. Effects of roasting conditions on the physicochemical properties and volatile distribution in perilla oils (Perilla frutescens var. japonica). J. Food Sci. 76: 808–816 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang S, Hwang H, Yoon S, Choe E. Temperature dependence of autoxidation of perilla oil and tocopherol degradation. J. Food Sci. 75: 498–505 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laureati M, Buratti S, Bassoli A, Borgonovo G, Pagliarini E. Discrimination and characterization of three cultivars of Perilla frutescens by means of sensory descriptors and electronic nose and tongue analysis. Food Res. Int. 43: 959–964 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong JH, Yoon EK, Chung SJ, Chung L, Cha SM, O’Mahony M, Vickers Z, Kim KO. Sensory characteristics and cross-cultural consumer acceptability of Bulgogi (Korean traditional barbecued beef). J. Food Sci. 76: 306–313 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ISO 13299. Sensory Analysis-Methodology-General Guidance to Establish a Sensory Profile. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang X, Wei W, Zheng Y, Chen L, Qianrong C. Essential oil variations in different Perilla L. accessions: Chemotaxonomic implications. Plant Syst. Evol. 281 (1–4): 1–10 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Martinetti L, Ferrante A, Bassoli A, Borgonovo G, Tosca A, Spoleto P. Characterization of some qualitative traits in different perilla cultivars. Acta Hortic. 939: 301–308 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Macfie HJH, Bratchell N, Greenhoff K, Vallis LV. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. J. Sens. Stud. 4: 129–148 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ISO 8589. Sensory Analysis-General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pagès J. Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: Application to the study of ten white wines from the Loire Valley. Food Qual. Pref. 16: 642–649 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Risvik E, McEwan JA, Colwill JS, Rogers R, Lyon DH. Projective mapping: A tool for sensory analysis and consumer research. Food Qual. Pref. 5: 263–269 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pagès J, Cadoret M, Lê S. The sorted Napping: A new holistic approach in sensory evaluation. J. Sens. Stud. 25: 637–658 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Le Dien S, Pagès J. Hierarchical multiple factor analysis: Application to the comparison of sensory profiles. Food Qual. Pref. 14: 397–403 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lê S, Josse J, Husson F. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 25: 1–18 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lea P, Næs T, Rødbotten M. Analysis of Variance for Sensory Data. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK. pp. 20–21 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zannoni M. Approaches to translation problems of sensory descriptors. J. Sens. Stud. 12: 239–253 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prescott J. Comparisons of taste perceptions and preferences of Japanese and Australian consumers: overview and implications for cross-cultural sensory research. Food Qual. Pref. 9: 393–402 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tu VT, Valentin D, Husson F, Dacremont C. Cultural differences in food description and preference: Contrasting Vietnamese and French panellists on soy yogurts. Food Qual. Pref. 21: 602–610 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim YK, Jombard L, Valentin D, Kim KO. A cross-cultural study using Napping: Do Korean and French consumers perceive various green tea products differently? Food Res. Int. 53: 534–542 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ishii R, Kawaguchi H, O’Mahony M, Rousseau B. Relating consumer and trained panels’ discriminative sensitivities using vanilla flavored ice cream as a medium. Food Qual. Pref. 18: 89–96 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Matsutani A. Perilla seeds unearthed from the excavations. Koukogaku J. 389: 9–13 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pagès J, Bertrand C, Ali R, Husson F, Lê S. Sensory analysis comparison of eight biscuits by French and Pakistani panels. J. Sens. Stud. 22: 665–686 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yeh L, Kim K, Chompreeda P, Rimkeeree H, Yau N, Lundahl D. Comparison in use of the 9-point hedonic scale between Americans, Chinese, Koreans and Thai. Food Qual. Pref. 9: 413–419 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cox DN, Clark MR, Mialon VS. A cross-cultural methodological study of the uses of two common hedonic response scales. Food Qual. Pref. 12: 119–131 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Laureati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laureati, M., Pagliarini, E., Bassoli, A. et al. Sensory and hedonic perceptions of italian and korean subjects: a Cross-Cultural study of Perilla Frutescens . Food Sci Biotechnol 23, 1111–1120 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-014-0152-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-014-0152-y

Keywords

Navigation