Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of demographics and brand information on acceptability of commercial beverage products

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Food Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to understand the sensory and non-sensory factors that were related to consumer acceptability of 10 commercial beverages. In the descriptive analysis, eight trained panelists developed and evaluated 18 sensory attributes. In the consumer test, 360 consumers were recruited for testing based on age and gender. Preference maps were obtained to observe relationships between descriptive data and consumer acceptability. Sensory attributes and consumer acceptability differed significantly among the beverages. Sweet, sour, and fruit flavors seemed to be drivers of liking, bitter, red ginseng, and reishi mushroom flavors, the drivers of disliking. Consumers tended to give higher overall acceptability scores to beverages when presented with product information than without information. There were marked differences in overall acceptability according to age and gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee OH, Lee HS, Sung YE, Lee SM, Kim YK, Kim KO. Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of various green teas. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2: 349–356 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim HG, Hong JH, Song CK, Shin HW, Kim KO. Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of fermented soybean paste (doenjang). J. Food Sci. 75: S375–S383 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Challacombe CA, Seetharaman K, Duizer LM. Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptance of bread and cracker products made from red or white wheat. J. Food Sci. 76: S337–S346 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoon EY, Hong JH, Lê S, Kim KO. Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of red ginseng extracts produced with different processing methods. J. Food Sci. 76: S270–S279 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vickers ZM. Incorporating tasting into a conjoint analysis of taste, health claim, price and brand for purchasing strawberry yogurt. J. Sens. Stud. 8: 341–352 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Solheim R, Lawless HT. Consumer purchase probability affected by attitude towards low-fat foods: liking, private body consciousness and information on fat and price. Food Qual. Prefer. 7: 137–143 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Westcombe A, Wardle J. Influence of relative fat content information on responses to three foods. Appetite 28: 49–62 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guinard JX, Uotani B, Schlich P. Internal and external mapping of preferences for commercial lager beers: Comparison of hedonic ratings by consumers blind versus with knowledge of brand and price. Food Qual. Prefer. 12: 243–255 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mizutani N, Okamoto M, Yamaguchi Y, Kusakabe Y, Dan I, Yamanaka T. Package image modulate flavor perception for orange juice. Food Qual. Prefer. 21: 867–872 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luckow T, Delahunty CM. Which juice is’ healthier’? A consumer study of probiotic non-dairy juice drinks. Food Qual. Prefer. 15: 751–759 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho HY, Chung SJ, Kim HS, Kim KO. Effect of sensory characteristics and non-sensory factors on consumer liking of various canned tea products. J. Food Sci. 70: S532–S538 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kozlowska K, Jeruszka M, Matuszewska I, Roszkowski W, Barylko-Pikielna N, Brzozowska A. Hedonic tests in different locations as predictors of apple juice consumption at home in elderly and young subjects. Food Qual. Prefer. 14: 653–661 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lawless HT, Horne J, Giasi P. Astringency of organic acids is related to pH. Chem. Senses 21: 397–403 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Park SK, Kim JK, Kim JH, Moon KD, Oh SL. Study on the characteristic of physicochemical quality of oolong herbs tea by extraction conditions. Korean J. Dietary Culture 9: 411–417 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SH, Park JH, Cho NS, Yu HJ, You SK, Cho CW, Kim DC, Kim YH, Kim KH. Sensory evaluation and bioavailability of red ginseng extract (Rg1, Rb1) by complexation with Γ-Cyclodextrin. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 41: 106~110 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khokhar S, Magnusdottir SGM. Total phenol, catechin, and caffeine contents of teas commonly consumed in the United Kingdom. J. Agr. Food Chem. 50: 565–570 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee MJ, Kwon DJ, Park OJ. The comparison of antioxidant capacities and catechin contents of Korea commercial green, oolong, and black teas. Korean J. Food Culture 22: 449–453 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laing DG, Prescott J, Bell GA, Gillmore R, Allen S, Best DJ, Yoshida M, Yamazak K, Ishii R. Responses of Japanese and Australians to sweetness in the context of different food. J. Sens. Stud. 9: 131–155 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Babicz-Zielinska E. Food preferences among the Polish young adults. Food Qual. Prefer. 10: 139–145 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bower JA, Saadat MA, Whitten C. Effect of liking, information and consumer characteristics on purchase intention and willingness to pay more for a fat spread with a proven health benefit. Food Qual. Prefer. 14: 65–74 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mueller S, Szolnoki G. The relative influence of packaging, labeling, branding and sensory attributes on liking and purchase intent: Consumers differ in their responsiveness. Food Qual. Prefer. 21: 774–783 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tepper BJ, Trail AC. Taste or health: a study on consumer acceptance of corn chips. Food Qual. Prefer. 9: 267–272 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kihlberg I, Johansson L, Langsrud Ø, Risvik E. Effects of information on liking of bread. Food Qual. Prefer. 16: 25–35 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. di Monaco R, Cavella S, di Marzo S, Masi P. The effect of expectations generated by brand name on the acceptability of dried semolina pasta. Food Qual. Prefer. 15: 429–437 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Murray JM, Delahunty CM. Mapping consumer preference for the sensory and packaging attributes of Cheddar cheese. Food Qual. Prefer. 11: 419–435 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mesías FJ, Escribano M, Rodríguez de Ledesma A, Pulido F. Consumer’s preferences for beef in the Spanish region of Extremadura: A study using conjoint analysis. J. Sci. Food Agr. 85: 2487–2494 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Furnols M Front i, Realini C, Montossi F, Sañudo C, Campo MM., Oliver MA, Nute GR., Guinard JX, Uotani B, Schlich P. Consumer’s purchasing intention for lamb meat affected by country of origin, feeding system and meat price: A conjoint study in Spain, France, and United Kingdom. Food Qual. Prefer. 22: 443–451 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng HW, Clark AD, Heymann H. Influence of selected marketing factors on consumer response to restructured beef steaks: Conjoint analysis. J. Sens. Stud. 4: 165–178 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bruhn CM, Cotter A, Diaz-Knauf K, Sutherlin J, West E, Wightman N, Williamson E, Yaffee M. Consumer attitudes and market potential for dairy products utilizing fat substitutes. J. Dairy Sci. 75: 2569–2577 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wright CA, Bruhn CM, Heymann H, Bamforth CW. Beer consumers’ perceptions of the health aspects of alcoholic beverages. J. Food Sci. 73: H12–H17 (2008a)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwang-Ok Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, HK., Jeon, SY. & Kim, KO. The effects of demographics and brand information on acceptability of commercial beverage products. Food Sci Biotechnol 22, 1–10 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-013-0218-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-013-0218-2

Keywords

Navigation