Food Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 691–696 | Cite as

Effects of fat and sucrose in palate cleansers on discrimination of burning sensation of capsaicin samples

  • Kyu-Won Lee
  • Kwang-Ok KimEmail author
Research Article


Repeated tasting of spicy foods could affect the accuracy of sensory evaluation because of the accumulating and lasting of burning sensation. Therefore, protocols are needed to overcome this problem. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of 6 milk based palate cleansers varying in fat and sucrose level on discrimination of burning sensation of capsaicin samples prepared at different concentrations. The effects were observed at 3 different interval lengths (1, 3, and 5 min) using different subjects. Subjects rated the intensity of burning sensation of the samples using 15-point category scales and they completed 7 sessions including 1 warm up session, using a different palate cleanser in each session. At 3 min interval, fat seemed to be more effective than sucrose, and the effects of fat was still more increased with the addition of sucrose. However, consistent trends were not observed at 1 and 5 min intervals.


palate cleanser interval length capsaicin burning sensation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Caterina MJ, Schumacher MA, Tominaga M, Rosen TA, Levine JD, Julius D. The capsaicin receptor: A heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature 389: 816–824 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bryant BP, Moore PA. Factors affecting sensitivity of the lingual trigeminal nerve to acids. Am. J. Physiol. 168: R58–R65 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu L, Welch JM, Erickson RP, Reinhart PH, Simon SA. Different responses to repeated applications of zingerone in behavioral studies, recording from intact and cultured TG neurons, and from VR1 receptors. Physiol. Behav. 69: 177–186 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prescott J. The generalizability of capsaicin sensitization and desensitization. Physiol. Behav. 66: 741–749 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sloan AE. Top 10 food trends. Food Technol. -Chicago 65: 27–41 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson EA, Vickers Z. The effectiveness of palate cleansing strategies for evaluating the bitterness of caffeine in cream cheese. Food Qual. Prefer. 15: 311–316 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delwiche JF, O’Mahony M. Changes in secreted salivary sodium are sufficient to alter salt taste sensitivity: Use of signal detection measures with continuous monitoring of the oral environment. Physiol. Behav. 59: 605–611 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lucak CL, Delwiche JF. Efficacy of various palate cleansers with representative foods. Chem. Percept. 2: 32–39 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stevens DA, Lawless HT. Putting out the fire: Effects of tastants on oral chemical irritation. Percept. Psychophys. 39: 346–350 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sizer F, Harris N. The influence of common food additives and temperature on threshold perception of capsaicin. Chem. Sens. 10: 279–286 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anseloni V, Weng H, Terayama R, Letizia D, Davis B, Ren K, Dubner R, Ennis M. Age-dependency of analgesia elicited by intraoral sucrose in acute and persistent pain models. Pain 97: 93–103 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shide D, Blass E. Opioidlike effects of intraoral infusions of corn oil and polycose on stress reactions in 10-day-old rats. Behav. Neurosci. 103: 1168–1175 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewkowski MD, Young SN, Ghosh S, Ditto B. Effects of opioid blockade on the modulation of pain and mood by sweet taste and blood pressure in young adults. Pain 135: 75–81 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baron RF, Panfield MP. Capsaicin heat intensity-concentration, carrier, fat level, and serving temperature effects. J. Sens. Stud. 11: 295–316 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hutchinson SE, Trantow LA, Vickers ZM. The effectiveness of common foods for reduction of capsaicin burn. J. Sens. Stud. 4: 157–164 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nasrawi CW, Pangborn RM. Temporal effectiveness of mouthrinsing on capsaicin mouth-burn. Physiol. Behav. 47: 617–623 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lawless HT. Oral chemical irritation: Psychophysical properties. Chem. Sens. 9: 143–155 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dowell KJ, Chambers E, Milliken GA, Chambers DH. Predicting interstimulus intervals between samples for capsaicin-containing salsa with a range of heat levels. J. Sens. Stud. 20: 187–199 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ASTM. Standard test method for sensory evaluation of red pepper heat. Designation E1083-00. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson EA, Vickers Z. The effectiveness of palate cleansing strategies for evaluating the bitterness of caffeine in cream cheese. Food Qual. Prefer. 15: 311–316 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vickers Z, Morris EE, Savaria M. Effectiveness of palate cleansers for evaluating sourness. J. Sens. Stud. 23: 526–532 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carden LA, Penfield MP, Saxton AM. Perception of heat in cheese sauces as affected by capsaicin concentration, fat level, fat mimetic, and time. J. Food Sci. 64: 175–179 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Steiner JE, Glaser D, Hawilo ME, Berridge KC. Comparative expression of hedonic impact: Affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates. Neurosci. Biobehav. R. 25: 53–74 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blass EM, Shah A. Pain-reducing properties of sucrose in human newborns. Chem. Sens. 20: 29–35 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lewkowski MD, Ditto B, Roussos M, Young SN. Sweet taste and blood pressure-related analgesia. Pain 106: 181–186 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Allison AA, Chambers E, Milliken GA, Chambers DH. Effects of interstimulus rinsing and time on measurements of capsaicin heat in tomato salsa. J. Sens. Stud. 14: 401–414 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Avancini TCA, Cubero E, O’Mahony M. Same different discriminations test with interstimulus delays up to one day. J. Sens. Stud. 14: 1–18 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim KO, Ennis DM, O’Mahony M. A new approach to category scales of intensity: Use of d’ values. J. Sens. Stud. 13: 251–267 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cain WS. Odor identification by male and females: Predictions vs. performance. Chem. Sens. 7: 129–142 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Engen T. Remembering odors and their names. Am. Sci. 75: 497–503 (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Food Science and Technology and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food Science and EngineeringEwha Womans UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations