Skip to main content
Log in

Lactobacillus acidophilus fermented yam (Dioscorea opposita Thunb.) and its preventive effects on gastric lesion

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Food Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was carried out to find the possibility of fermenting yam (Dioscorea opposita Thunb.) with Lactobacillus acidophilus and the protective role on stomach lesion of rats. The solutions of raw and extracted yam used were 2 and 6%, and they were fermented by L. acidophilus at 37°C for 0, 12, 24, and 36 h. At intervals (0, 12, 24, and 36 h), viscosity, titratable acidity (TA), allantoin, and diosgenin were examined. In the results, it was observed the most desirable data at 12 h with 6% fermented raw yam (FRY) without any change in the content of allantoin and diosgenin. In the animal study by rats (Sprague-Dawley), the inhibition ratios on gastric lesion were 53.41% in FRY. Based on these data, it confirmed that raw yam powder fermented by L. acidophilus would be a functional food with the supplement of viable cells and nutraceutical component of allantoin and diosgenin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shah NP. Functional foods from probiotics and prebiotics. Food Technol. -Chicago 55: 46–53 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee YK, Salminen S. The coming of age of probiotics. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 6: 241–245 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gomes AMP, Malcata FX. Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus acidophilus: Biological, biochemical, technological, and therapeutical properties relevant for use as probiotics. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 10: 139–157 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilliland SE, Speck ML. Enumeration and identity of lactobacilli in dietary products. J. Food Protect. 40: 760–762 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Achi OK, Akubor PI. Microbiological characterization of yam fermentation for ‘Elubo’ (yam flour) production. World J. Microb. Biot. 16: 3–7 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park JH, Ahn J, Kwak HS. Physicochemical properties of Dioscorea opposita Thunb. solution fermented by Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 30: 773–779 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Babajide JM, Oyewole OB, Henshaw FO, Babajide SO, Olasantan FO. Effect of local preservatives on quality of traditional dry yam slices ‘Gbodo’ and its products. World J. Agric. Sci. 2: 267–273 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kouassi B, Diopoh J, Leroy Y, Fournet B. Soluble sugars from yam and changes during tuber storage. Phytochemistry 29: 1069–1072 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu YC, Ferng LHA, Huang PY. Quantitative analysis of allantoin and allantoic acid in yam tuber, mucilage skin, and bulbil of the Dioscorea species. Food Chem. 94: 541–549 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS User’s Guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wanasundara JPD, Ravindran G. Nutritional assessment of yam (Dioscorea alata) tubers. Plant Food. Hum. Nutr. 46: 33–39 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoon KY, Woodams EE, Hang YD. Probiotication of tomato juice by lactic acid bacteria. J. Microbiol. 42: 315–318 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chang KJ, Park BJ, Paek JH, Kim SL, Park CH. Tuber enlargement and chemical components of yams (Dioscorea opposita Thunb.). Korean J. Plant Res. 18: 161–168 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shin KO, Jeon JR, Lee JS, Kim JY, Lee CH, Kim SCD, Yu Y, Nam DH. Lactic acid fermentation of Chinese yam (Dioscorea batatas Decne) flour and its pharmaceutical effect on gastrointestinal function in rat model. Biotechol. Bioproc. E. 11: 240–244 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Misaki A, Ito T, Harada T. Constitutional studies on the mucilage of “yamanoimo”, Dioscorea batatas Decne, forma Tsukune: Isolation and structure of a mannan. Agr. Biol. Chem. Tokyo 36: 761–71 (1972)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsai SS, Tai FJ. Studies on the mucilage from tuber of yam (Dioscorea alata Linn.) I. Isolation and purification of the mucilage. J. Chin. Agr. Chem. Soc. 22: 88–94 (1984)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lodish H, Matsudaira P, Berk A, Zipursky SL, Scott MP. Molecular cell biology. Vol. 1, pp. 1092–1093. In: Cell Growth and Development. 6th ed. Freeman WH & Co. and Chinese Union Medical Univ., Joint Publishing. New York, NY, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fsu FL, Lin YH, Lee MH, Lin CL, Hou WC. Both dioscorin, the tuber storage protein of yam (Dioscorea alata cv. Tainong No. 1), and its peptic hydrolysates exhibited angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory activities. J. Agr. Food Chem. 50: 6109–6113 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu CC, Huang YC, Yin MC, Lin SJ. Effect of yam (Dioscorea alata compared to Dioscorea japonica) on gastrointestinal function and antioxidant activity in mice. J. Food Sci. 71: 513–516 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeon JR, Lee JS, Lee CH, Kim JY, Kim SD, Nam DH. Effect of ethanol extract of dried Chinese yam (Dioscorea batatas) flour containing dioscin on gastrointestinal function in rat model. Arch. Pharm. Res. 29: 348–353 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hae-Soo Kwak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.Y., Ganesan, P., Ahn, J. et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus fermented yam (Dioscorea opposita Thunb.) and its preventive effects on gastric lesion. Food Sci Biotechnol 20, 927–932 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-011-0128-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-011-0128-0

Keywords

Navigation