Skip to main content
Log in

Antiviral activity of yogurt against enterovirus 71 in vero cells

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Food Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Five yogurts were fermented with each bacteria strain. The viability and pH of each yogurt during fermentation or storage were evaluated, and then the cytotoxicity and antiviral activity against enterovirus (EV) 71 of cell-free supernatants (CFS) of the metabolites of each yogurt were compared with those of de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth fermented with the same bacteria. As the results, the number of viable bacteria for each yogurt after fermentation or during storage always remained higher than 5 log CFU/mL and the pH of those ranged from 4 to 6. The CFS of all yogurts showed antiviral activity over 45% against EV71, while it didn’t exhibit cytotoxicity in Vero cells. Specially, the CFS of yogurt fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum and Bifidobacterium bifidum exhibited high anti-EV71 activity of 92.74 and 90.44%, respectively. In contrast, the CFS of each MRS broth fermented with the same bacteria showed low antiviral activity of less than 30%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McMinn PC. An overview of the evolution of enterovirus 71 and its clinical and public health significance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26: 91–107 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang LY, Lee CY, Kao CL, Fang TY, Lu CY, Lee PI, Huang LM. Hand, foot, and mouth disease complicated with central nervous system involvement in Taiwan in 1980–1981. J. Formosan Med. Assoc. 106: 173–176 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lum LC, Wong KT, Lam SK, Chua KB, Goh AY, Lim WL, Ong BB, Paul G, AbuBakar S, Lambert M. Fatal enterovirus 71 encephalomyelitis. J. Pediatr. 133: 795–798 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mizuta K, Abiko C, Murata T, Matsuzaki Y, Itagaki T, Sanjoh K, Sakamoto M, Hongo S, Murayama S, Hayasaka K. Frequent importation of enterovirus 71 from surrounding countries into the local community of Yamagata, Japan, between 1998 and 2003. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 6171–6175 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong KT, Lum LC, Lam SK. Enterovirus 71 infection and neurologic complications. New Eng. J. Med. 342: 356–358 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang LY, Lin TY, Huang YC. Fulminant neurogenic pulmonary oedema with hand, foot, and mouth disease. Lancet 352: 367–368 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho M, Chen ER, Hsu KH, Twu SJ, Chen KT, Tsai SF, Wang JR, Shih SR. An epidemic of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan. New Eng. J. Med. 341: 929–935 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin SJ, Yeh TF. Clinical spectrum of enterovirus 71 infection in children in southern Taiwan, with an emphasis on neurological complications. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29: 184–190 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanders ME. Lactic acid bacteria as promoters of human health. pp. 294–322. In: Functional Foods. Goldberg L (ed). Chapman and Hall Company, New York, NY, USA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vasiljevic T, Shah NP. Fermented milk: Health benefits beyond probiotic effect. pp. 99–116. In: Handbook of Food Product Manufacturing. Hui YH (ed). John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, Hoboken, NJ, USA (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Schezenmeir J, De Vrese M. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: Approaching a definition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73: 361S–364S (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Corcoran BM, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP. Survival of probiotic lactobacilli in acidic environments is enhanced in the presence of metabolizable sugars. Appl. Environ. Microb. 71: 3060–3067 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin W, Hwang C, Chen L, Tsen H. Viable counts, characteristic evaluation for commercial lactic acid bacteria products. Food Microbiol. 23: 74–81 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boti cell culture model to study antiviral activity of potential probiotic bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 115: 227–234 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin ZX, Hoult JRS, Raman A. Sulforhodamine B assay for measuring proliferation of a pigmented melanocyte cell line and its application to the evalution of crude drugs used in the treatment of vitiligo. J. Ethnopharmacol. 66: 141–150 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dave RI, Shah NP. Viability of yoghurt and probiotic bacteria in yoghurts made from commercial starter cultures. Int. Dairy J. 7: 31–41 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilliland SE, Speck ML. Instability of L. acidophilus in yoghurt. J. Dairy Sci. 60: 1394–1398 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kneifel W, Jaros D, Erhard F. Microflora and acidification properties of yoghurt and yoghurt related products fermented with commercially available starter cultures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 18: 179–189 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurmann JA, Rasic JL. The health potential of products containing bifidobacteria. pp. 117–158. In: Therapeutic Properties of Fermented Milks. Robinson RK (ed). Elsevier Applied Food Science Series, London, UK (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samona A Robinson RK. Effect of yogurt cultures on the survival of bifidobacteria in fermented milks. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 47: 58–60 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Beaulieu J, Dupont C, Lemieux P. Whey proteins and peptides: Beneficial effects on immune health. Therapy 3: 1–10 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanders ME, Huis in’t Veld J. Bringing a probiotic containing functional food to the market: Microbiological, product, regulatory, and labeling issues. Anton Leeuw. Int. J. G. 76: 293–315 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schaller JP, Saif LJ, Cordle CT, Candler E, Winship TR, Smith KL. Prevention of human rotavirus-induced diarrhea in gnotobiotic piglets using bovine antibody. J. Infect. Dis. 165: 623–630 (1992)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Berkhout B, van Wamel JL, Beljaars L, Meijer DK, Visser S, Floris R. Characterization of the anti-HIV effects of native lactoferrin and other milk proteins and protein-derived peptides. Antivir. Res. 55: 341–355 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ng TB, Lam TL, Au TK, Ye XY, Wan CC. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase by bovine milk proteins. Life Sci. 69: 2217–2223 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang H, Ye X, Ng TB. First demonstration of an inhibitory activity of milk proteins against immunodefiency virus-1 reverse transcriptase and effect of succinylation. Life Sci. 67: 2745–2752 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Adibi SA, Morse EL. Intestinal transport of dipeptides in man: Relative importance of hydrolysis and intact absorption. J. Clin. Invest. 50: 2266–2275 (1971)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hara H, Funabiki R, Iwata M, Yamazaki K. Portal absorption of small peptides in rats under unrestrained conditions. J. Nutr. 114: 1122–1129 (1984)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Satake M, Enjoh M, Nakamura Y, Takano T, Kawamura Y, Arai S, Shimizu M. Transepithelial transport of the bioactive tripeptide, Val-Pro-Pro, in human intestinal Caco-2 cell monolayers. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 66: 378–384 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Möller NP, Elisabeth K, Scholz-Ahens RN, Schezenmeir J. Bioactive peptides and proteins from foods: Indication for health effects. Eur. J. Nutr. 47: 171–182 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dur-Han Kwon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, HJ., Song, JH., Park, KS. et al. Antiviral activity of yogurt against enterovirus 71 in vero cells. Food Sci Biotechnol 19, 289–295 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0042-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0042-x

Keywords

Navigation