Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of gout flare after medication: prescription symmetry sequence analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The research aimed to study the following questions: (1) five well-known gout-related medications were selected to test the validity of the prescription symmetry sequence analysis in Taiwan; (2) four exploratory medications were selected to test their relation to gout flares.

Methods

We utilized the 2003–2017 dataset of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program containing all claims data with 2 million beneficiaries as a data source. In order to explore the temporal association, we designed a scenario of medication-induced gout flares. Nine medications were selected as the index agent, including aspirin (low-dose), thiazide diuretics, loop diuretics, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, metformin, pioglitazone, fenofibrate, and losartan. The gout flare was defined as subjects with use of the marker agent for treatment of gout flares. The observation-window period between initiation of the index agent and initiation of the marker agent was 1 year. Subjects who used an index agent and a marker agent on the same day were excluded. The prescription symmetry sequence analysis was carried out to compare the observed number of persons who took an index agent prior to starting a marker agent with the observed number of persons who took a marker agent before starting an index agent. The adjusted sequence ratio (adjusted SR) with 95% confidence interval was applied to estimate the relation between an index agent and the marker agent.

Results

Among five medications including aspirin (low-dose), thiazide diuretics, loop diuretics, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide, the adjusted sequence ratio ranged from 1.15 to 3.35 and all reached statistical significance. Fenofibrate use and losartan use were associated with a lower probability of gout flares, with reaching statistical significance (adjusted SR = 0.60 for fenofibrate and adjusted SR = 0.92 for losartan). Metformin use was associated with a greater probability of gout flares, with reaching statistical significance (adjusted SR = 1.14). Pioglitazone use did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

Based on the confirmatory analysis including five well-known gout-related medications, this study supports that the prescription symmetry sequence analysis can be used to detect an adverse drug event associated with one potential offending agent. The exposure to fenofibrate or losartan might be a protective factor against gout flares. Metformin use could be associated with a greater probability of gout flares, but this finding should be validated by other studies.

Key Points:

• What is already known about this subject?

1. The prescription symmetry sequence analysis is a useful method for detecting an adverse drug reaction associated with one potential offending drug.

2. Numerous medications are found to induce gout flares.

• What does this study add?

1. The prescription symmetry sequence analysis supports the evidence that aspirin (low-dose), thiazide diuretics, loop diuretics, ethambutol and pyrazinamide are associated with a greater probability of gout flares.

2. The exposure to fenofibrate or losartan might be a protective factor against gout flares.

3. Metformin use could be associated with a greater probability of gout flares.

• How might this impact on clinical practice or future developments?

1. Clinicians should always consider the possibility of medication-induced gout flares. If gout flares develop, discontinuation of risky medications is the first step. Then prescribing cascades can be eliminated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Petri H, de Vet HC, Naus J, Urquhart J (1988) Prescription sequence analysis: a new and fast method for assessing certain adverse reactions of prescription drugs in large populations. Stat Med 7:1171–1175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hallas J (1996) Evidence of depression provoked by cardiovascular medication: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Epidemiology 7:478–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lai EC, Pratt N, Hsieh CY, Lin SJ, Pottegård A, Roughead EE et al (2017) Sequence symmetry analysis in pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiologic studies. Eur J Epidemiol 32:567–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morris EJ, Hollmann J, Hofer AK, Bhagwandass H, Oueini R, Adkins LE et al (2022) Evaluating the use of prescription sequence symmetry analysis as a pharmacovigilance tool: a scoping review. Res Social Adm Pharm 18:3079–3093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Huang ST, Hsu TC, Peng LN, Hsiao FY, Chen LK (2022) Detecting suspected prescribing cascades by prescription sequence symmetry analysis of nationwide real-world data. J Am Med Dir Assoc 23:468–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalbeth N, Gosling AL, Gaffo A, Abhishek A (2021) Gout Lancet 397:1843–1855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mikuls TR (2022) Gout. N Engl J Med 387:1877–1887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott JT (1991) Drug-induced gout. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 5:39–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ben Salem C, Slim R, Fathallah N, Hmouda H (2017) Drug-induced hyperuricaemia and gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 56:679–688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsiropoulos I, Andersen M, Hallas J (2009) Adverse events with use of antiepileptic drugs: a prescription and event symmetry analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 18:483–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Waldman B, Ansquer JC, Sullivan DR, Jenkins AJ, McGill N, Buizen L et al (2018) Effect of fenofibrate on uric acid and gout in type 2 diabetes: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised, controlled FIELD study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 6:310–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Würzner G, Gerster JC, Chiolero A, Maillard M, Fallab-Stubi CL, Brunner HR et al (2001) Comparative effects of losartan and irbesartan on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with hyperuricaemia and gout. J Hypertens 19:1855–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, Abeles AM et al (2020) 2020 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the management of gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 72:744–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lund LC, Højlund M, Henriksen DP, Hallas J, Kristensen KB (2021) Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of gout: a Danish population based cohort study and symmetry analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 30:1391–1395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wood DT, Waterbury NV, Lund BC (2023) Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and gout risk: a sequence symmetry analysis. Clin Rheumatol 42:2469–2475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu JR, Yeh HC, Mueller NT, Appel LJ, Miller ER 3rd, Maruthur NM et al (2021) Effects of a behavioral weight loss intervention and metformin treatment on serum urate: results from a randomized clinical trial. Nutrients 13:2673

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Niu SW, Chang KT, Lin HY, Kuo IC, Chang YH, Chen YH et al (2018) Decreased incidence of gout in diabetic patients using pioglitazone. Rheumatology (Oxford) 57:92–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kutoh E, Hori T (2013) Effect of pioglitazone on serum uric acid levels in newly diagnosed, drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocr Res 38:151–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wahab IA, Pratt NL, Wiese MD, Kalisch LM, Roughead EE (2013) The validity of sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) for adverse drug reaction signal detection. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 22:496–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Shih-Wei Lai contributed to the conception of the article, initiated the draft of the article, and approved the final draft. Yu-Hung Kuo and Kuan-Fu Liao conducted data analysis. Bing-Fang Hwang and Chiu-Shong Liu interpreted the data and contributed equally to the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuan-Fu Liao.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 283 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lai, SW., Hwang, BF., Kuo, YH. et al. Risk of gout flare after medication: prescription symmetry sequence analysis. Clin Rheumatol 43, 1183–1188 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-06891-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-06891-x

Keywords

Navigation