Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) intervention could decrease the incidence of preeclampsia and other maternal and fetal outcomes among pregnant women with autoimmune disorders. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane databases were searched from inception until January 2022. Data on maternal or fetal outcomes of the control and hydroxychloroquine treatment groups were gathered and analyzed. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined. Cochran’s Q test, I2 statistics, leave-one-out analysis, Baujat plot analysis, GOSH plot analysis, and multivariable meta-regression were applied to assess between-study heterogeneity. The meta-analysis was performed using the Stata V.16.1 software. Baujat plot analysis and GOSH plot analysis were performed using the R V.4.0.0 software. Our study included 21 cohort studies and one case–control study with a total of 3948 pregnancies with immune disorders. HCQ treatment significantly reduced the incidence of preeclampsia (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.33–0.63, p = 0.000, I2 3.68%). After outlier omission, HCQ treatment significantly reduced the incidence of premature delivery (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73–0.96, p = 0.01, I2 44.81%) in pregnant women with autoimmune disorders. In sub-group analysis, HCQ also significantly reduced the incidence of gestational hypertension (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26–0.68, p = 0.001, I2 49.33%) and preterm birth (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48–0.82, p = 0.001, I2 27.63%) in pregnant women with lupus. The heterogeneity of the findings mentioned above was low to moderate. There were no significant differences in the risk of other outcomes, including gestational diabetes, HELLP syndrome, thrombosis, spontaneous abortion, fetal loss, small for gestational age infant (SGA), low birth weight, stillbirth, APGAR score < 7, and congenital malformation. This meta-analysis indicated that HCQ treatment could significantly decrease the incidence of preeclampsia and premature delivery in pregnant women with autoimmune disorders. In addition, HCQ could reduce the risk of gestational hypertension in pregnant lupus patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
References
Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R (2010) Pre-eclampsia. Lancet (London, England) 376:631–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60279-6
Tal R (2012) The role of hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in preeclampsia pathogenesis. Biol Reprod 87:134. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.112.102723
GötestamSkorpen C, Hoeltzenbein M, Tincani A et al (2016) The EULAR points to consider for use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation. Ann Rheum Dis 75:795–810. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208840
Zhou L, Xin X, Chu Y (2017) The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine sulfate on pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Chin J Rheumatol 21:10–14
Motta M, Tincani A, Faden D, Zinzini E, Chirico G (2002) Antimalarial agents in pregnancy. Lancet 359:524–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07643-2
Rainsford KD, Parke AL, Clifford-Rashotte M, Kean WF (2015) Therapy and pharmacological properties of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and related diseases. Inflammopharmacology 23:231–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-015-0239-y
Seo MR, Chae J, Kim YM et al (2019) Hydroxychloroquine treatment during pregnancy in lupus patients is associated with lower risk of preeclampsia. Lupus 28:722–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203319843343
Leroux M, Desveaux C, Parcevaux M et al (2015) Impact of hydroxychloroquine on preterm delivery and intrauterine growth restriction in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a descriptive cohort study. Lupus 24:1384–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203315591027
Levy RA, Vilela VS, Cataldo MJ et al (2001) Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in lupus pregnancy: double-blind and placebo-controlled study. Lupus 10:401–404. https://doi.org/10.1191/096120301678646137
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed) 339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64:383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748
DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
Viechtbauer W, Cheung MW (2010) Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 1:112–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.11
Olkin I, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA (2012) GOSH - a graphical display of study heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods 3:214–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1053
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed) 327:557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed) 315:629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Mekinian A, Lazzaroni MG, Kuzenko A et al (2015) The efficacy of hydroxychloroquine for obstetrical outcome in anti-phospholipid syndrome: data from a European multicenter retrospective study. Autoimmun Rev 14:498–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2015.01.012
Sciascia S, Hunt BJ, Talavera-Garcia E, Lliso G, Khamashta MA, Cuadrado MJ (2016) The impact of hydroxychloroquine treatment on pregnancy outcome in women with antiphospholipid antibodies. Am J Obstet Gynecology 214:273e271–273e278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.078
Latino JO, Udry S, Aranda F et al (2020) Risk factors for early severe preeclampsia in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome with conventional treatment. The impact of hydroxychloroquine. Lupus 29:1736–1742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203320952850
Gerde M, Ibarra E, Mac Kenzie R et al (2021) The impact of hydroxychloroquine on obstetric outcomes in refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. Thromb Res 206:104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2021.08.004
Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Amoura Z, Duhaut P et al (2003) Safety of hydroxychloroquine in pregnant patients with connective tissue diseases: a study of one hundred thirty-three cases compared with a control group. Arthritis Rheum 48:3207–3211. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.11304
Diav-Citrin O, Blyakhman S, Shechtman S, Ornoy A (2013) Pregnancy outcome following in utero exposure to hydroxychloroquine: a prospective comparative observational study. Reprod Toxicol 39:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.04.005
Andersson NW, Skov L, Andersen JT (2021) Fetal safety of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine use during pregnancy: a nationwide cohort study. Rheumatology (United Kingdom) 60:2317–2326. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa592
Beksac MS, Donmez HG (2021) Impact of hydroxychloroquine on the gestational outcomes of pregnant women with immune system problems that necessitate the use of the drug. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 47:570–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14561
Chambers CD, Johnson DL, Xu R et al (2022) Birth outcomes in women who have taken hydroxycholoroquine in pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol 74:711–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42015
Tang C, Si FL, Yao YX et al (2022) The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in pregnant patients with IgA nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study. Nephrology (Carlton) 27:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.13991
Buchanan NMM, Toubi E, Khamashta MA, Lima F, Kerslake S, Hughes GRV (1996) Hydroxychloroquine and lupus pregnancy: review of a series of 36 cases. Ann Rheum Dis 55:486–488. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.55.7.486
Clowse MEB, Magder L, Witter F, Petri M (2006) Hydroxychloroquine in lupus pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum 54:3640–3647. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22159
Baalbaki S, Subramaniam A, Szychowski J, Tang Y, Wetta L (2015) Systemic lupus erythematosus: outcomes in women treated with and without hydroxychloroquine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:S273–S274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.594
Kroese SJ, De Hair MJH, Limper M et al (2017) Hydroxychloroquine use in lupus patients during pregnancy is associated with longer pregnancy duration in premature deliverys. J Immunol Res 2017:2810202. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2810202
Abd Rahman R, Min Tun K, KamisanAtan I, Mohamed Said MS, Mustafar R, Zainuddin AA (2020) New Benefits of hydroxychloroquine in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective study in a tertiary centre. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 42:705–711. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715140
Do SC, Rizk NM, Druzin ML, Simard JF (2020) Does hydroxychloroquine protect against preeclampsia and preterm delivery in systemic lupus erythematosus pregnancies? Am J Perinatol 37:873–880. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402752
Haase I, Schneider M, Brinks R, Fischer-Betz R (2020) Safety and beneficial effects of hydroxychloroquine on pregnancy outcomes in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 72:3578–3579. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41538
Canti V, Scarrone M, De Lorenzo R et al (2021) Low incidence of intrauterine growth restriction in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus taking hydroxychloroquine. Immunol Med 44:204–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/25785826.2020.1868652
Liu Y, Zhang Y, Wei Y, Yang H (2021) Effect of hydroxychloroquine on preeclampsia in lupus pregnancies: a propensity score-matched analysis and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 303:435–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05762-5
Louthrenoo W, Trongkamolthum T, Kasitanon N, Wongthanee A (2021) Predicting factors of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Thai patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A STROBE-compliant study. Medicine 100:e24553. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024553
Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF (2006) WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet (London, England) 367:1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9
Bujold E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y et al (2010) Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 116:402–414. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e9322a
Andreoli L, Bertsias GK, Agmon-Levin N et al (2017) EULAR recommendations for women’s health and the management of family planning, assisted reproduction, pregnancy and menopause in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 76:476–485. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209770
Hung TH, Burton GJ (2006) Hypoxia and reoxygenation: a possible mechanism for placental oxidative stress in preeclampsia. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 45:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60224-2
Mandang S, Manuelpillai U, Wallace EM (2007) Oxidative stress increases placental and endothelial cell activin A secretion. J Endocrinol 192:485–493. https://doi.org/10.1677/JOE-06-0061
Ryan MJ, McLemore GR Jr (2007) Hypertension and impaired vascular function in a female mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 292:R736-742. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00168.2006
Rahman R, Murthi P, Singh H et al (2016) The effects of hydroxychloroquine on endothelial dysfunction. Pregnancy Hypertens 6:259–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2016.09.001
Limaye MA, Buyon JP, Cuneo BF, Mehta-Lee SS (2020) A review of fetal and neonatal consequences of maternal systemic lupus erythematosus. Prenat Diagn 40:1066–1076. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5709
Garner P, Gülmezoglu AM (2006) Drugs for preventing malaria in pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:Cd000169. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000169.pub2
Tarfaoui N, Autret-Leca E, Mazjoub S, Cissoko H, Jonville-Bera AP (2013) Hydroxychloroquine during pregnancy: a review of retinal toxicity in the newborns. Therapie 68:43–47. https://doi.org/10.2515/therapie/2013003
Sperber K, Hom C, Chao CP, Shapiro D, Ash J (2009) Systematic review of hydroxychloroquine use in pregnant patients with autoimmune diseases. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 7:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-7-9
Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Amoura Z, Huong DL, Lechat P, Piette JC (2005) Safety of hydroxychloroquine in pregnant patients with connective tissue diseases. Review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev 4:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2004.11.009
Duan J, Ma D, Wen X et al (2021) Hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis for preeclampsia, hypertension and prematurity in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Lupus 30:1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033211007199
Liu LJ, Yang YZ, Shi SF et al (2019) Effects of Hydroxychloroquine on proteinuria in IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 74:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.026
Acknowledgements
We sincerely appreciate Home for Researchers editorial team (www.home-for-researchers.com) for language editing service.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFC2700700).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YL and HY contributed to the design of this study. YL, YW, and HY conducted the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. YZ conducted the analysis underwent through R software. YL drafted the manuscript. YL, YW, YZ, and HY revised the work. All the authors approved the version to be published. All the authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
None.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
PROSPERO registration
Date: 2022/02/25. Number: CRD42022306824.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Wei, Y., Zhang, Y. et al. Hydroxychloroquine significantly decreases the risk of preeclampsia in pregnant women with autoimmune disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol 42, 1223–1235 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06496-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06496-2