Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of hydroxychloroquine in pregnancy and its effect on perinatal outcomes in a population with autoimmune abnormalities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study was conducted to analyse the medication indications of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and to explore the clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes of pregnancy in women with autoimmune abnormalities. The value of HCQ against placental dysfunction–related pregnancy outcomes in people with autoimmune abnormalities was also explored.

Methods

① To collect HCQ application cases during pregnancy who were hospitalized and delivered from 2016 to 2020. The classification and distribution of HCQ indications were analysed. The characteristics of cases and pregnancy outcomes were discussed. ② To include pregnancy combined with autoimmune abnormalities population during the period. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, classification, medication time frame, and pregnancy outcomes were discussed.

Results

① There were 741 cases of HCQ use during pregnancy. Classification by drug indication was as follows: 257 cases (34.68%) had clear indications for autoimmune diseases. There were 359 controversial cases, as follows: 140 (18.89%) cases of antiphospholipid syndrome and 219 (29.55%) cases of autoantibody-positive cases who had no clear drug indication and also used HCQ during pregnancy. No indications were found for 125 cases (16.87%), without autoimmune abnormalities and empirical medication of HCQ during pregnancy. ② In 853 pregnancies with autoimmune abnormalities, women with systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and undifferentiated connective tissue disease had clear indications for HCQ. The proportions of HCQ applied during pregnancy were 86.67%, 85.71%, 73.53%, and 75.00%. The start of medication before pregnancy only accounted for 74.44%, 65.31%, 64.71%, and 43.38%. ③ Medication indicated antiphospholipid syndrome and simple autoantibody-positive cases in the controversial population. The proportions of cases in which HCQ was used during pregnancy were 74.47% (140/188) and 64.79% (219/338). Application of HCQ during pregnancy significantly reduced pre-eclampsia (19.8% vs. 8.91%, P < 0.001), early-onset pre-eclampsia (7.78% vs. 2.51%, P = 0.007), and pregnancy loss during the middle and late pregnancy stages (2.99% vs. 0.56%, P = 0.036) in this controversial population.

Conclusion

Empirical, over-indicated, or even no indications usage of HCQ in pregnancy is common. The strength of standardized and specialist management are needed in populations with clear HCQ indications. HCQ-indicated controversial population should avoid overdiagnosis and guard against the potential risks of combined anticoagulation and glucocorticoid therapy. The incidence of placental dysfunction diseases in people with autoimmune abnormalities increases. HCQ application may alleviate the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in this population.

Key Points

The incidence of placental dysfunction diseases in people with autoimmune abnormalities increases.

Our work have discovered the unique value of HCQ in improving placental dysfunction diseases in autoimmune abnormal cases, not just in AID such as SLE, SS, UTCD, and RA.

HCQ is a potential drug option for autoimmune abnormalities to improve placental function, by providing synergistic prevention and treatment of these disorders, not just single target of antispasmodic, anti-hypertensive, and circulatory improvement.

Empirical, over-indicated, or even no indications usage of HCQ in pregnancy is common. However, the strength of standardized and specialist management are needed in populations with clear HCQ indications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Third Hospital of Peking University but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study, and so are not publicly available. However, data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission of Third Hospital of Peking University.

Abbreviations

HCQ:

Hydroxychloroquine

AID:

Autoimmune diseases

SLE:

Systemic lupus erythematosus

APS:

Antiphospholipid syndrome

SS:

Sjögren’s syndrome

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

UTCD:

Undifferentiated connective tissue disease

References

  1. Deharde D, Klockenbusch W, Schmitz R et al (2020) Correction: Hydroxychloroquine as a preventive and therapeutic option in preeclampsia-a literature review[J]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 80(07):e71–e71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Li J, Polonium Chen BN, Zhang LY et al (2021) The use and research progress of hydroxychloroquine in improving placenta-derived pregnancy complications[J]. Intl J Obstet Gynecol 48(3):6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petri M (2020) Pregnancy and systemic lupus erythematosus [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 64:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andreoli L, Bertsias G, Agmonlevin N et al (2017) EULAR recommendations for women’s health and the management of family planning assisted reproduction pregnancy and menopause in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome [J]. Ann Rheum Dis 76(3):476–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schreiber K, Hunt BJ (2019) Managing antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy. Thromb Res 181(1):S41–S46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chinese Medical Association, Perinatal Medicine Branch (2020) Expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Chin J Perinatal Med 23(8):6

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Seror R et al (2017). 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome [J]. Ann Rheum Dis 76(1):9–16

  8. Levy RA, GR De Jesús, NR De Jesús et al (2016) Critical review of the current recommendations for the treatment of systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases during pregnancy and lactation[J]. Autoimmun Rev 15(10):955–963

  9. Neogi T, Aletaha D, Silman AJ et al (2010) The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report[J]. Arthritis Rheumatol 62(9):2582–2591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spinillo A, Beneventi F, Caporali R et al (2017) Undifferentiated connective tissue diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes. An undervalued association?[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol 78(6):e12762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chinese Expert Consensus on the Use of Immunosuppressive Drugs in Recurrent Miscarriage Combined with Rheumatic Immune Diseases (2020) Chinese Expert Consensus on the Use of Immunosuppressive Drugs in Recurrent Abortion Combined with Rheumatic Diseases[J]. Chin J Reprod Contracept 40(7):8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang HY (2020) Recurrent miscarriage and autoimmune diseases[J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet 36(11):6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Obstetrics and Gynecology Section of the Chinese Medical Association (2016) Expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of recurrent miscarriage[J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 000(001):3–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rpl TEGGO, Ruth BA, Bjarne CO etal (2018) ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss[J]. Hum Reprod Open 2018(2):hoy004

  15. Fetal Medicine Group of the Perinatal Medicine Branch of the Chinese Medical Association Obstetrics and Gynecology Section of the Chinese Medical Association (2019) Expert consensus on fetal growth restriction (2019 edition) [J]. Chin J Perinatal Med 22(6):20

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang Z, Zhang WY (2020) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (2020)[J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 55(4):227–238

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skeith L, Blondon M, Inle FN (2020) Understanding and preventing placenta-mediated pregnancy complications[J]. Hamostaseologie 40(3):356–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Albrecht ED, Pepe GJ (2020) Regulation of uterine spiral artery Remodeling: a Review[J]. Reprod Sci 27(10):1932–1942

  19. Zeng Q, Tingting W (2021) Research progress of maternal-fetal immune regulation mechanism[J]. J Shandong Univ: Med Ed 59(8):8

    Google Scholar 

  20. Perez-Sepulveda A, Torres MJ, Khoury M et al (2014) Innate immune system and preeclampsia [J]. Front Immunol 5:244

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghaebi M, Nouri M, Ghasemzadeh A et al (2017) Immune regulatory network in successful pregnancy and reproductive failures [J]. Biomed Pharmacother 88:61–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Somers EC (2020) Pregnancy And Autoimmune Diseases[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 64:3–10

  23. Beksac MS, HG Dnmez (2020) Impact of hydroxychloroquine on the gestational outcomes of pregnant women with immune system problems that necessitate the use of the drug[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 47(2)

  24. Rahman R, Murthi P, Singh H et al (2016) The effects of hydroxychloroquine on endothelial dysfunction[J]. Pregnancy Hypertens: an Intl J Women’s Cardiovasc Health 6(4):259–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moreuil CD, Alavi Z, Pasquier E (2020) Hydroxychloroquine may be beneficial in preeclampsia and recurrent miscarriage[J]. Bri J Clin Pharmacol 86(1):39–49

  26. Rahman RA, Dekoninck P, Murthi P et al (2017) Treatment of preeclampsia with hydroxychloroquine: a review [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 31(4):525–529

  27. KOU Xi, ZHAO Ai-Min (2021) Research progress of hydroxychloroquine in the field of reproductive immunity[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ: Med Ed 41(003):380–385

  28. Albert CR, Schlesinger WJ, Viall CA et al (2013) Effect of hydroxychloroquine on antiphospholipid antibody-induced changes in first trimester trophoblast function[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol 71(2):154–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Spinillo A, Bellingeri C, Maggio ID et al (2021) The impact of various entities of anti-phospholipid antibodies positivity on adverse pregnancy outcome. An epidemiological perspective[J]. J Reprod Immunol 145(5):103304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ye SL, Gu XK, Tao LY et al (2017) Efficacy of different treatment regimens for antiphospholipid syndrome-related recurrent spontaneous abortion [J]. Chin Med J 130(12):1395–1399

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Amoura Z, Du L et al (2005) Safety of hydroxychloroquine in pregnant patients with connective tissue diseases. Review of the literature [J]. Autoimmun Rev 4(2):111–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mekinian A, Cohen J, Alijotas-Reig J et al (2016) Unexplained recurrent miscarriage and recurrent implantation failure: is there a place for immunomodulation? [J]. Am J Reprod Immunol 76(1):8–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zeron P et al (2009) Clinical efficacy and side effects of antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review[J]. Ann Rheum Dis 69(1):20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gaffar R, Pineau CA, Bernatsky S et al (2019) Risk of ocular anomalies in children exposed in utero to antimalarials: a systematic literature review[J]. Arthritis Care Res 71(12):1606–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaplan YC, Ozsarfati J, Nickel C et al (2016) Reproductive outcomes following hydroxychloroquine use for autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta -analysis [J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol 81(5):835–848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Huybrechts KF, Bateman BT, Zhu Y et al (2021) Hydroxychloroquine early in pregnancy and risk of birth defects[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 224(3):290 e1-290 e22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA et al (2019) The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: a pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 145(1):1–33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Yanhong Zhang, Li J, Jing Su et al (2019) Aspirin resistance and genetic polymorphism correlation in pregnant women at high risk of preeclampsia[J]. Intl J Obstet Gynecol 46(4):5

    Google Scholar 

  39. He YD, Chen Q (2021) Limitations and clinical application options of aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia[J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet 37(5):4

    Google Scholar 

  40. Roberge S, Demers S, Nicolaides KH, Bureau M, Côté S, Bujold E (2016) Prevention of pre-eclampsia by low-molecular-weight heparin in addition to aspirin: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 47(5):548–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Buyon JP, Hiebert R, Copel J et al (1998) Autoimmune-associated congenital heart block: demographics, mortality, morbidity and recurrence rates obtained from a National Neonatal Lupus Registry[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol 31(7):1658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Carvalho JS (2019) Fetal dysrhythmias[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 58:28–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gleicher N, Elkayam U (2013) Preventing congenital neonatal heart block in offspring of mothers with anti-SSA/Ro and SSB/La antibodies: a review of published literature and registered clinical trials [J]. Autoimmun Rev 12(11):1039–1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Izmirly PM, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Pisoni CN et al (2012) Maternal use of hydroxychloroquine is associated with a reduced risk of recurrent anti-SSA/Ro-antibody-associated cardiac manifestations of neonatal lupus[J]. Circulation 126(1):76–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Izmirly P, Kim M, Friedman DM et al (2020) Hydroxychloroquine to prevent recurrent congenital heart block in fetuses of anti-SSA/Ro-positive mothers[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol 76(3):292–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Hamulyák EN, Scheres LJ, Marijnen MC, Goddijn M, Middeldorp S (2020) Aspirin or heparin or both for improving pregnancy outcomes in women with persistent anti-phospholipid antibodies and recurrent pregnancy loss[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5(5):CD012852

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Prof. Jiuliang Zhao, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, for his professional guidance on the study design and expert discussion. Special thanks to Lin Zeng, associate professor of the Clinical Epidemiological Research Center of Peking University Third Hospital, and M.D. Wen Zhang and M.D. Huifeng Shi from Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology for the guidance on statistical methods of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yongqing Wang, Jinxia Zhao, and Shenglong Ye contributed to conception and study design. Shenglong Ye wrote the main manuscript text. Xueqing Zhao, Yuanying Liu, and Yue Ma participated in collecting and analysing the data. All the authors had full access to all of the data in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yongqing Wang or Jinxia Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee and Institutional Review Board of the Third Hospital of Peking University, People’s Republic of China (2022 No. 203–01).

This study is a retrospective study, the records and data did not include potential patient identifying information, and the project did not involve any commercial interests. Therefore, an exemption from informed consent of this study was approved.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication is not applicable.

Disclosures

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, S., Zhao, X., Liu, Y. et al. The use of hydroxychloroquine in pregnancy and its effect on perinatal outcomes in a population with autoimmune abnormalities. Clin Rheumatol 42, 1137–1150 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06462-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06462-y

Keywords

Navigation