Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the adalimumab biosimilar TQ-Z2301 and adalimumab for the treatment of Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the clinical equivalence of TQ-Z2301, a biosimilar of adalimumab, to the reference adalimumab in the treatment of Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.

Methods

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled phase III clinical trial was conducted in 19 centers across China. Chinese adults with active ankylosing spondylitis despite being treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for ≥ 4 weeks were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to subcutaneously receive 40 mg of TQ-Z2301 or adalimumab every other week for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who achieved at least 20% improvement according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria (ASAS20) at week 24. The equivalence was established if the 90% CI for RR of ASAS20 between two groups at week 24 fell within (0.80, 1.25). Secondary endpoints included efficacy measures of disease activity, spinal mobility, physical function and quality of life, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Safety analysis was done for all patients who received at least one study drug.

Results

A total of 380 patients were enrolled in the study between September 2018 and October 2019, including 188 in the TQ-Z2301 group and 192 in the adalimumab group. In the full analysis population, the ASAS20 response rate at week 24 was 86.70% in the TQ-Z2301 group, and 80.73% in the adalimumab group, the RR of ASAS20 for TQ-Z2301 versus adalimumab was 1.074, 90% CI (0.997, 1.157), fell within the predefined equivalence boundary (0.80, 1.25). Except for the SF-36 at week 12, there was no statistical difference between the two groups for all the secondary endpoints (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse events group was 82.45% in the TQ-Z2301, and 83.85% in the adalimumab group, the safety profile of the two groups was similar. The profiles of immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics were also similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

TQ-Z2301 is equivalent to adalimumab for the treatment of Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. The safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic characteristics of both drugs are similar.

Trial registration

The study (CTR20181863) was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 19 October 2018.

Key Points

• TQ-Z2301 showed the equivalence of efficacy compared with the reference adalimumab for the treatment of Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.

• The safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics profiles of TQZ-2301 were similar to those of the reference adalimumab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets analyzed for this study regarding the efficacy and safety of treatment are available from Dr. Chunde Bao (baochunde_1678@126.com) upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Sieper J, Poddubnyy D (2017) Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet 390(10089):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31591-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taurog JD, Chhabra A, Colbert RA (2016) Ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis. N Engl J Med 374(26):2563–2574. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1406182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jieruo G, Xie Y, Kehu Y, Qing L, Yi Z, Cibo H et al (2020) Practice guideline for patients with ankylosing spondylitis/spondyloarthritis. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 59(7):511–518. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20200505-00448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liudan T, Rai JC, Cao S, Lin Z, Hu Z, Gu J (2014) Costs and work limitation of patients with ankylosing spondylitis in China. Clin Exp Rheumatol 32(5):661–666

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ritchlin C, Adamopoulos IE (2021) Axial spondyloarthritis: new advances in diagnosis and management. BMJ 372:m4447. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ji X, Wang Y, Ma Y, Hu Z, Man S, Zhang Y, Li K, Yang J, Zhu J, Zhang J, Huang F (2019) Improvement of disease management and cost effectiveness in chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis using a smart-phone management system: a prospective cohort study. Biomed Res Int 2019:2171475. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2171475

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ward MM, Deodhar A, Gensler LS, Dubreuil M, Yu D et al (2019) Update of the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network Recommendations for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 71(10):1285–1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith JA (2015) Update on ankylosing spondylitis: current concepts in pathogenesis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 15(1):489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-014-0489-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitoma H, Horiuchi T, Tsukamoto H, Ueda N (2018) Molecular mechanisms of action of anti-TNF-alpha agents - Comparison among therapeutic TNF-alpha antagonists. Cytokine 101:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2016.08.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mounach A, El Maghraoui A (2014) Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in ankylosing spondylitis. Open Access Rheumatol 6:83–90. https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S44550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rudwaleit M, Claudepierre P, Wordsworth P, Cortina EL, Sieper J et al (2009) Effectiveness, safety, and predictors of good clinical response in 1250 patients treated with adalimumab for active ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 36(4):801–808. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.081048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Heijde D, Breban M, Halter D, DiVittorio G, Bratt J et al (2015) Maintenance of improvement in spinal mobility, physical function and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 5 years in a clinical trial of adalimumab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54(7):1210–1219. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Heijde D, Kivitz A, Schiff MH, Sieper J, Dijkmans BAC et al (2006) Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 54(7):2136–2146. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21913

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang F, Jieruo G, Zhu P, Bao C, Xu J, Xu H, Wu H et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Chinese adults with active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomised, controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 73(3):587–594. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lie E, Lindström U, Zverkova-Sandström T, Olsen IC, Forsblad-d’Elia H et al (2017) Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment and occurrence of anterior uveitis in ankylosing spondylitis: results from the Swedish biologics register. Ann Rheum Dis 76(9):1515–1521. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao X, Wendling D, Botteman MF, Carter JA, Rao S, Cifaldi M (2012) Clinical and economic burden of extra-articular manifestations in ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. J Med Econ 15(6):1054–1063. https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2012.692341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rudwaleit M, Rødevand E, Holck P, Vanhoof J, Kron M, Kary S, Kupper H (2009) Adalimumab effectively reduces the rate of anterior uveitis flares in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a prospective open-label study. Ann Rheum Dis 68(5):696–701. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.092585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen S, Genovese MC, Choy E, Perez-Ruiz F, Matsumoto A et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study. Ann Rheum Dis 76(10):1679–1687. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wynne C, Altendorfer M, Sonderegger I, Gheyle L, Ellis-Pegler R et al (2016) Bioequivalence, safety and immunogenicity of BI 695501, an adalimumab biosimilar candidate, compared with the reference biologic in a randomized, double-blind, active comparator phase I clinical study (VOLTAIRE(R)-PK) in healthy subjects. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 25(12):1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2016.1255724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee CWC, Najafzadeh M, Kesselheim AS, Sarpatwari A (2021 Oct) Cost to medicare of delayed adalimumab biosimilar availability. Clin Pharmacol Ther 110(4):1050–1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma J et al (2021) Expert consensus on the clinical application of biosimilars. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 30(3):129–136. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115356-20210117-00018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Gao Z, Liu Z, Liu G, Xinyao Q, Chen J, Ren X, Xu Z, Yang H (2021) A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, two-way, parallel phase I clinical study comparing the pharmacokinetics and safety of adalimumab injecta and Humira(R) in healthy Chinese male volunteers. Expert Opin Biol Ther:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2021.1944097

  23. Huang F, Zhang F-C, Bao C-d, Tao Y, Jie-Ruo G et al (2009) Adalimumab plus methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a multi-center randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 48(11):916–921. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2009.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cai L, Gu J, Zheng J, Zheng M, Wang G, Xi L-Y et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results from a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 31(1):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen B, Gao X, Zhong J, Ren J, Zhu X et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Chinese patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: results from a randomized trial. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 13:1756284820938960. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756284820938960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu C, Li M, Duan X, Fang Y, Li Q et al (2018) Chinese registry of rheumatoid arthritis (CREDIT): I. Introduction and prevalence of remission in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 36(5):836–840

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jinmei S, Li M, He L, Zhao D, Wan W et al (2020) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (Humira) and the adalimumab biosimilar candidate (HS016) in Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-Blind, parallel, phase III clinical trial. BioDrugs 34(3):381–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-020-00408-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Elewaut D, Matucci-Cerinic M (2009) Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and extra-articular manifestations in everyday rheumatology practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48(9):1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kep146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Strik AS, van den Brink GR, Ponsioen C, Mathot R, Löwenberg M, D'Haens GR (2017) Suppression of anti-drug antibodies to infliximab or adalimumab with the addition of an immunomodulator in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 45(8):1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen S, Pablos JL, Pavelka K, Müller GA, Matsumoto A, Kivitz A, Wang H, Krishnan E (2019) An open-label extension study to demonstrate long-term safety and efficacy of ABP 501 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 21(1):84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1857-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Genovese MC, Kellner H, Arai Y, Muniz R, Alten R (2020) Long-term safety, immunogenicity and efficacy comparing FKB327 with the adalimumab reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: data from randomised double-blind and open-label extension studies. RMD Open 6(1):e000987. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000987

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Weinblatt ME, Baranauskaite A, Dokoupilova E, Zielinska A, Jaworski J et al (2018) Switching From Reference Adalimumab to SB5 (Adalimumab Biosimilar) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Fifty-Two-Week Phase III Randomized Study Results. Arthritis Rheumatol 70(6):832–840. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen SB, Alonso-Ruiz A, Klimiuk PA, Lee EC, Peter N, Sonderegger I, Assudani D (2018) Similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of adalimumab biosimilar BI 695501 and Humira reference product in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the phase III randomised VOLTAIRE-RA equivalence study. Ann Rheum Dis 77(6):914–921. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd, China who provided the study drugs and funding.

Funding

This study was supported by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd, China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study design and data acquisition, The data analysis was performed by HY. JL and ZX drafted the manuscript. XC and CB revised the manuscript. The manuscript was critically reviewed by all authors for intelligent input. All authors have read the final version, approve it, and take full responsibility for the integrity of the study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaoxiang Chen or Chunde Bao.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standards

This study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of medicine (RJLS2018-089) on Sep.7th,2018. All patients provided written Informed consent. The registration number of this study in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry is CTR20181863.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Xue, Z., Wu, Z. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the adalimumab biosimilar TQ-Z2301 and adalimumab for the treatment of Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol 41, 3005–3016 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06199-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06199-8

Keywords

Navigation