Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Highly cited papers in Takayasu arteritis on Web of Science and Scopus: cross-sectional analysis

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a large vessel vasculitis affecting relatively younger population. Since literature on bibliometric analysis of TAK is scarce, we analyzed top-cited articles in TAK to address this knowledge gap.

Methods

We analyzed the top hundred cited articles in TAK on Web of Science and Scopus for time of publication, article type, country of origin, source journal, and authors. Furthermore, we conducted univariable- and multivariable-adjusted linear regression analyses to explore associations of rank of cited articles, mean number of annual citations, and total citations with traditional (journal impact factor, CiteScore) and alternative (PlumX) metrics.

Results

Concordance between databases was 76%. Most top-cited articles were from the USA, Japan, or the UK, and published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Arthritis and Rheumatism, and Circulation and Rheumatology (Oxford). Original articles comprised a majority of these top-cited articles. Articles describing criteria or disease management recommendations received the highest mean number of citations. Performing multivariable-adjusted linear regression analyses, years of publication associated with mean annual citations on Web of Science as well as total citations across databases (p < 0.01). The 2-year JIF significantly associated with mean annual citations on Web of Science (p = 0.047). On Scopus, the number of captures denoted under PlumX metrics consistently associated with citations (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Both traditional and alternative metrics associate with higher citations in TAK. Development of disease assessment and clinical practice guidelines and conduct and reporting of randomized controlled trials to guide TAK management are important research areas. The key points themselves are all right.

Key Points

A majority of top-cited papers in TAK are original articles.

Both traditional and alternative metrics associate with number of citations for these papers.

Recommendations for disease assessment or clinical practice and clinical trials are important research agenda in TAK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Abbreviations

FWCI:

Field-weighted citation impact

GCA:

Giant cell arteritis

JIF:

Journal Impact Factor

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

SD:

Standard deviation

TAK:

Takayasu arteritis

UK:

United Kingdom

USA:

United States of America

References

  1. Misra DP, Misra R (2015) Assessment of disease activity in Takayasu’s arteritis. Indian J Rheumatol 10:S43–S47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injr.2015.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Misra DP, Wakhlu A, Agarwal V, Danda D (2019) Recent advances in the management of Takayasu arteritis. Int J Rheum Dis 22(Suppl 1):60–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.13285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA et al (2013) 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum 65:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.37715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Misra DP, Sharma A, Kadhiravan T, Negi VS (2017) A scoping review of the use of non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in the management of large vessel vasculitis. Autoimmun Rev 16:179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2016.12.009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Misra DP, Rathore U, Patro P, Agarwal V, Sharma A (2021) Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of Takayasu arteritis—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05743-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen WMY, Bukhari M, Cockshull F, Galloway J (2019) The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications: a bibliometric study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 59:277–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerber A, Klingelhoefer D, Groneberg D, Bundschuh M (2014) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides: a scientometric approach visualizing worldwide research activity. Int J Rheum Dis 17:796–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.12376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Şenel E, Demir E, Alkan RM (2017) Bibliometric analysis on global Behçet disease publications during 1980–2014: is there a Silk Road in the literature? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 31:518–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin X, Cheng F, Wang X et al (2019) Top 100 cited articles on rheumatoid arthritis: a bibliometric analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e14523. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000014523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao X, Chen J, Pan Y, Feng H, Meng B, Meng Y (2019) A bibliometric analysis of the global research in ankylosing spondyloarthritis (2008–2017). Rheumatol Int 39:1091–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04308-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD (2011) Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int 31:1409–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zimba O, Radchenko O, Strilchuk L (2020) Social media for research, education and practice in rheumatology. Rheumatol Int 40:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04493-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zimba O, Gasparyan AY (2021) Social media platforms: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia 59:68–72. https://doi.org/10.5114/reum.2021.102707

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tahamtan I, Safipour Afshar A, Ahamdzadeh K (2016) Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics 107:1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aksnes DW, Langfeldt L, Wouters P (2019) Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: an overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open 9:2158244019829575. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Horsley T, Dingwall O, Sampson M (2011) Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000026.pub2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Akyol A, Kocyigit BF (2021) Publication activity in the field of Sjögren’s syndrome: a ten-year Web of Science based analysis. Rheumatol Int 41:763–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04714-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Akyol A, Kocyigit BF (2021) Ankylosing spondylitis rehabilitation publications and the global productivity: a Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis (2000–2019). Rheumatol Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04836-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Masri DE, Alsaayed B, Masri JE, Zreika B, Chanbour H, Salameh P (2021) Contribution of Arab countries to familial Mediterranean fever research: a PubMed-based bibliometric analysis. Rheumatol Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04852-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bagcier F, Yurdakul OV, Ozduran E (2021) Top 100 cited articles on ankylosing spondylitis. Reumatismo 72:218–227. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2020.1325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA et al (2016) Specialist bibliographic databases. J Korean Med Sci 31:660–673. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Gerasimov AN, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD (2015) Preserving the integrity of citations and references by all stakeholders of science communication. J Korean Med Sci 30:1545–1552. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1545

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martín-Martín A, Orduna-Malea E, Thelwall M, Delgado López-Cózar E (2018) Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. J Informetr 12:1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Misra DP, Sharma A, Agarwal V (2018) Guidelines for management of rheumatic diseases in developing countries from basics to real-world situation: relevance, need, and processes for development. Rheumatol Int 38:549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-3996-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Misra DP, Naidu G, Agarwal V, Sharma A (2019) Vasculitis research: Current trends and future perspectives. Int J Rheum Dis 22(Suppl 1):10–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.13370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The conception and design of the study: DPM, AYG, OZ; acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data: DPM, VA, AS, AYG, OZ; drafting the article: DPM, VA, AS; revising it critically for important intellectual content: OZ, AYG; final approval of the version to be submitted: DPM, VA, AYG, OZ, AS; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: DPM, VA, AYG, OZ, AS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Durga Prasanna Misra.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study comprised no human studies conducted by any of the authors.

Disclosures

None.

Disclaimer

All the figures and tables used in the paper are original and not copied from elsewhere.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 51 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Misra, D.P., Agarwal, V., Gasparyan, A.Y. et al. Highly cited papers in Takayasu arteritis on Web of Science and Scopus: cross-sectional analysis. Clin Rheumatol 41, 129–135 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05901-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05901-6

Navigation