Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient feedback identifies “Rheum” to improve clinic visit preparedness

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Healthcare providers and administrators are incorporating patient feedback to drive local health system improvement. Improvement interventions, including patient feedback, guided a novel approach for rheumatology patient appointment preparedness. We tested the interventions in a single rheumatology clinic. A comprehensive patient questionnaire was developed by assessing patients’ clinic access using patient journey mapping. The questionnaire was administered to a random cohort of 125 rheumatology patients about their feedback on pre-clinic practices. From the responses, modifications were made to existing administrative practices within the clinic. The modified practices were tested with an additional cohort of 10 patients aligned to one rheumatologist, assessing overall patients’ preparedness and clinic visit cycle time. It was identified from the questionnaire that during appointment booking, inconsistent pre-clinic planning information was communicated to patients and the appointment package did not support patient preparedness, resulting in extending clinic visits. Standardization of the appointment phone call script, updating the appointment package, and inclusion of a clinic visit preparation checklist, reduced the clinic visit cycle time by 10 minutes for new patients, and 5 minutes for existing patients. The participating clinic rheumatologist also perceived improved patient preparedness and clinic visit flow based on the modified practices. In this study, patient feedback was used to identify patient-centred interventions to improve patient preparedness at clinic visits. The interventions developed were simple and easy to incorporate into practice. Systematic collection of and strategies based on patient feedback was determined to be a valid, meaningful method for incorporating clinical quality improvement.

Key points

Structured patient feedback can inform quality improvement practices in a rheumatological clinic setting.

A patient journey map outlining healthcare clinic access can help to understand patient experiences and needs.

Simple, patient-centred interventions, such as an appointment package and a consistent telephone reminder script, improved patient preparedness and reduced average clinic cycle time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Robinson J (2006) The patient’s journey: systemic lupus erythematosus. Br Med J 332:1374–1376 Available at: https://www.bmj.com/content/332/7554/1374. Accessed October 24, 2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simpson C, Franks C, Morrison C, Lempp H (2005) The patient’s journey: rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med J 331:887–889. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1255800/

  3. Lapsley P, Groves T (2004) The patient’s journey: travelling through life with a chronic illness: a new BMJ series to deepen doctors’ understanding. BMJ: British Med J 329:582. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC516645/. Accessed October 24, 2020–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Flott KM, Graham C, Darzi A, Mayer E (2017) Can we use patient-reported feedback to drive change? the challenges of using patient-reported feedback and how they might be addressed. BMJ Qual Saf 26:502–507 Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27325796/. Accessed October 24, 2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh S, Burns KK, Rees J, Picklyk D, Spence J, Marlett N (2018) Patient and family engagement in Alberta Health Services: improving care delivery and research outcomes. Healthcare Manag Forum 31:57–61. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0840470417747003. Accessed October 24, 2020

  6. Sinsky CA, Sinsky TA, Rajcevich E. Pre-visit planning into practice.; 2015. Available at: www.aafp.org/fpm. Accessed October 24, 2020.

  7. Savarino JR, Kaplan JL, Winter HS, Moran CJ, Israel EJ (2016) Improving clinical remission rates in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease with previsit planning. BMJ Quality Improvement Reports 5:u211063.w4361 Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27559471/. Accessed November 5, 2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rivo J, Page TF, Arrieta A, Amofah SA, McCann S, Kassaye H, Rodriguez A, Williams ML (2016) The impact of comprehensive pre-visit preparation on patient engagement and quality of care in a population of underserved patients with diabetes: evidence from the care management medical home center model. Popul Health Manag 19:171–177 Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26440513/. Accessed November 5, 2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Savarimuthu SM, Jensen AE, Schoenthaler A, Dembitzer A, Tenner C, Gillespie C, Schwartz MD, Sherman SE (2013) Developing a toolkit for panel management: improving hypertension and smoking cessation outcomes in primary care at the VA. BMC Fam Pract 14:176 Available at: http://bmcfampract.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2296-14-176. Accessed November 5, 2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the clinical nurses and staff for aiding in the conduction of this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EY is the corresponding author and EY, PM, XS, and LD are credited for the conception, design, and data collection. ML, XS, and PM conducted the data analysis and interpretation and created the manuscript. NK critically revised the manuscript and oversaw the design of the study and data collection. All authors edited and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elaine Yacyshyn.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

A full ethics board review was not required as this study was classified as a QI project with minimal risk to participants, as per our organizational policies. The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Consent to participate

Applicable written and verbal consent was obtained from all participants. Furthermore, the project was also fully explained in detail to all participants with all questions/concerns answered.

Consent for publication

Participants of this project are aware of the intention to publish and have given their consent.

Disclosures

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(TIF 858 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathura, P., Li, M., Sun, X. et al. Patient feedback identifies “Rheum” to improve clinic visit preparedness. Clin Rheumatol 41, 275–279 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05873-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05873-7

Keywords

Navigation