Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparable long-term outcomes between DAS28-ESR remission criteria and ACR/EULAR definitions in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare long-term clinical, immunological, and radiographic outcomes between five sets of remission criteria (four clinical and one ultrasound (US)-based) in a cohort of RA patients in a clinical care setting.

Methods

RA patients in remission (DAS28-ESR <2.6) were selected. Hand US assessments were made, and serum levels of inflammation/angiogenesis biomarkers were determined at baseline. Changes in baseline treatment and radiographic progression, defined as the variation in the modified Sharp van der Heijde score (mSHS) at 5 years, were analyzed. Five concepts were used to define remission: DAS28-ESR<2.6, SDAI<3.3, CDAI<2.8, Boolean criteria and Power Doppler score (PD)=0.

Results

Eighty-seven patients with DAS28-ESR<2.6 were included. One-third fulfilled SDAI (33.3%), CDAI (31%), and Boolean (35.6%) remission criteria, and 25.3% had no PD signal in the US evaluation. 26 patients (29.9%) changed therapy, ranging from 13.6% (PD remission) to 33.3% (CDAI remission) (p=0.11). Serum levels of ANG (p=0.015) and TNFa (p=0.025) were significantly lower in patients with Boolean remission, whereas IL-18 levels were significantly lower in those with PD remission (p=0.049). Patients without PD in the US assessment had significantly-lower mSHS erosion progression (p=0.014) at 5 years.

Conclusions

Patients with established RA in DAS28-ESR remission had comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes in SDAI, CDAI, and Boolean definitions in a clinical care setting. US remission remained the closest to structural damage abrogation.

Key Points

This study provides real world data on long-term outcomes of five clinical and imaging remission criteria in rheumatoid arthritis.

DAS28-ESR remission criteria had comparable radiographic progression and clinical prognosis than more stringent criteria in clinical practice.

US-based remission was closest to structural damage abolishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Breedveld FC, Boumpas D, Burmester G et al (2010) Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 69:631–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pinals RS, Masi AT, Larsen RA (1981) Preliminary criteria for clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 24:1308–1315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Heijde DM, van’t Hof M, van Riel PL, van de Putte (1993) Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists. J Rheumatol 20:579–581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prevoo ML, van Gestel AM, van’t Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL (1996) Remission in a prospective study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. American Rheumatism Association preliminary remission criteria in relation to the disease activity score. Br J Rheumatol 35:1101–1105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Schiff MH, Kalden JR, Emery P, Eberl G, van Riel PL, Tugwell P (2003) A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42:244–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Felson DT, Smolen JS, Wells G, Zhang B, van Tuyl LH, Funovits J et al (2011) American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 70:404–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramírez J, Ruíz-Esquide V, Pomés I, Celis R, Cuervo A, Hernández MV, Pomés J, Pablos JL, Sanmartí R, Cañete JD (2014) Patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission and ultrasound-defined active synovitis exhibit higher disease activity and increased serum levels of angiogenic biomarkers. Arthritis Res Ther 16:R5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown AK, Quinn MA, Karim Z, Conaghan PG, Peterfy CG, Hensor E, Wakefield RJ, O'Connor PJ, Emery P (2006) Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. Arthritis Rheum 54(12):3761–3773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramírez J, Narváez JA, Ruiz-Esquide V, Hernández-Gañán J, Cuervo A, Inciarte-Mundo J, Hernández MV, Sampayo-Cordero M, Pablos JL, Sanmartí R, Cañete JD (2017) Clinical and sonographic biomarkers of structural damage progression in RA patients in clinical remission: a prospective study with 12 months follow-up. Semin Arthritis Rheum 47:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown AK, Conaghan PG, Karim Z, Quinn MA, Ikeda K, Peterfy CG, Hensor E, Wakefield RJ, O'Connor PJ, Emery P (2008) An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 58(10):2958–2967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felton DT, Bingham CO 3rd et al (2010) 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62:2569–2581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van der Heijde DM (2000) How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol 27:261–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bruynesteyn K, Boers M, Kostense P, van der Linden S, van der Heijde D (2005) Deciding on progression of joint damage in paired films of individual patients: smallest detectable difference or change. Ann Rheum Dis 64:179–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Churchman SM, Geiler J, Parmar R, Horner EA, Church LD, Emery P, Buch MH, McDermott M, Ponchel F (2012) Multiplexing immunoassays for cytokine detection in the serum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: lack of sensitivity and interference by rheumatoid factor. Clin Exp Rheumatol 30:534–542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Inciarte-Mundo J, Hernández-Miguel MV, Ruiz-Esquide V, Raquel Cabrera-Villalba S, Ramirez J, Cuervo A et al (2016) Serum calprotectin versus acute-phase reactants in the discrimination of inflammatory disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Arthritis Care Res 68:899–906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Michelsen B, Kristianslund EK, Hammer HB, Fagerli KM, Lie E, Wierod A et al (2016) Discordance between tender and swollen joint count as well as patient´s and evaluator´s global assessment may reduce likelihood of remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: data from the prospective multicenter NOR-DMARD study. Ann Rheum Dis 76:708–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuriya B, Sun Y, Boire G, Haraoui B, Hitchon C, Pope JE, Thorne JC, Keystone EC, Bykerk VP, Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort Study (2012) Remission in early rheumatoid arthritis—a comparison of new ACR/EULAR remission criteria to established criteria. J Rheumatol 39:1155–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lisbona MP, Solano A, Ares J, Almirall M, Salman-Monte TC, Maymó J (2016) ACR/EULAR definitions of remission are associated with lower residual inflammatory activity compared with DAS28 remission on hand MRI in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 43:1631–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dale J, Stirling A, Zhang R, Purves D, Foley J, Sambrook M, Conaghan PG, van der Heijde D, McConnachie A, McInnes IB, Porter D (2016) Targeting ultrasound remission in early rheumatoid arthritis: the results of the TaSER study, a randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 75:1043–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mack ME, Hsia E, Aletaha D (2017) Comparative assessment of the different American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism remission definitions for rheumatoid arthritis for their use as clinical trial end points. Arthritis Rheum 69:518–528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Svensson B, Andersson ML, Bala SV, Forslind K, Hafström I, BARFOT study group (2013) Long-term sustained remission in a cohort study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: choice of remission criteria. BMJ Open 3:e003554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thiele K, Huscher D, Bischoff S, Späthling-Mestekemper S, Backhaus M, Aringer M, Kohlmann T, Zink A, for the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres (2013) Perfomance of the 2011 ACR/EULAR preliminary remission criteria compared with DAS28 remission in unselected patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 72:1194–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smolen JS, Collaud Basset S, Boers M, Breedveld F, Edwards CJ, Kvien TK, Miossec P, Sokka-Isler T, van Vollenhoven R, Abadie EC, Bruyère O, Cooper C, Mäkinen H, Thomas T, Tugwell P, Reginster JY, European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) (2016) Clinical trials of new drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: focus on early disease. Ann Rheum Dis 75:1268–1271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Khawaja MN, Bergman MJ, Yourish J, Pei J, Reiss W, Keystone E (2017) Routine assessment of patient index data 3 and the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Provisional Remission definitions as predictors of radiographic outcome in a rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial with tocilizumab. Arthritis Care Res 69:609–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smolen JS, Aletaha D (2011) Interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab and attainment of disease remission in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of acute-phase reactants. Arthritis Rheum 63:43–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen H, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gandjbakhch F, Constantin A, Foltz V, Cantagrel A (2014) Prevalence of ultrasound-detected residual synovitis and risk of relapse and structural progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 53:2110–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A, Palop MJ, Cabero F, Richi P, Carmona L, Crespo M (2007) Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. Arthritis Rheum 57:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Molenaar ET, Voskuyl AE, Dinant HJ, Bezemer PD, Boers M, Dijkmans BA (2004) Progression of radiologic damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission. Arthritis Rheum 50:36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sundlisaeter PN, Aga AB, Olsen IC, Hammer HB, Uhlig T, van der Heijde D et al (2018) Clinical and ultrasound remission after 6 months of treat-to-target therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: associations to future good radiographic and physical outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 77:1421–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Haavardsholm EA, Aga AB, Olsen IC, Lillegraven S, Hammer HB, Uhlig T et al (2016) Ultrasound in management of rheumatoid arthritis: ARCTIC randomized controlled strategy trial. BMJ 354:i4205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Møller-Bisgaard S, Horslev-Petersen K, Ejbjerg B, Hetland ML, Ornbjerg LM, Glinatsi D et al (2019) Effect of magnetic resonance imaging vs conventional treat-to-target strategies on disease activity remission and radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: the IMAGINE-RA randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramírez J, Cuervo AM, Celis R, Ruiz-Esquide V, Castellanos-Moreira R, Narváez JA et al (2020) Biomarkers for treatment change and radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission: a 5 year follow-up study. Rheumatology (Oxford) keaa258. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa258

  33. Jonsson MK, Sundlisaeter NP, Nordal HH, Hammer HB, Aga AB, Olsen IC et al (2017) Calprotectin as a marker of inflammation in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 76:2031–2037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gul HL, Eugenio G, Rabin T, Burska A, Parmar R, Wu J, Ponchel F, Emery P (2020) Defining remission in rheumatoid arthritis: does it matter to the patient? A comparison of multi-dimensional remission criteria and patient reported outcomes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 59:613–621

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shidara K, Nakajima A, Inoue E, Hoshi D, Sugimoto N, Seto Y, Tanaka E, Momohara S, Taniguchi A, Yamanaka H (2017) Continual maintenance of remission defined by the ACR/EULAR criteria in daily practice leads to better functional outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 44:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ana Vázquez and Anna Espinal from Servei d´Estadística Aplicada, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, for their advice on the statistical analysis. We thank David Buss for editorial assistance.

Funding

This work was supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS 11/01890 (JDC) and RIER RD12/0009). Co-financed by FEDER, European Union, “Una manera de hacer Europa”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JR and JDC had full access to all the study data and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of data analysis. JR, JDC, and RS were responsible for the study design. JR, JIM, VRE, RCM, AP, RC, AC, and JGP performed data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, and final approval of the manuscript. Manuscript preparation was by JR, JDC, and RS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julio Ramírez.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona Research Ethics Committee (HCB-2017-0562). Signed informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Disclosures

None.

Additional information

Pre-print version

We state that parts of this manuscript have been published on a preprint server DOI:https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-34234/v1.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramírez, J., Inciarte-Mundo, J., Cuervo, A. et al. Comparable long-term outcomes between DAS28-ESR remission criteria and ACR/EULAR definitions in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 40, 2665–2672 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05603-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05603-z

Keywords

Navigation