Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chagas disease reactivation in rheumatologic patients: association with immunosuppressive therapy and humoral response

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence for Chagas disease reactivation (CDR) in rheumatologic patients under rheumatologic treatments (RTs) is scarce. To screen and follow-up patients with rheumatic diseases and concomitant Chagas disease under RT to detect CDR and to describe a possible relationship between CDR and specific RT. An observational, longitudinal, prospective, consecutive study was carried out between 2018 and 2020. Included patients were evaluated during the follow-up for clinical and laboratorial manifestations of CDR. Direct blood parasitological examination (Strout method) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were employed to diagnose CDR. The dynamic of anti-T. cruzi–specific antibodies was also assessed by IHA and ELISA (total IgG and Anti-SAPA). Fifty-one patients were included (86% women). Rheumatoid arthritis was the predominant disease (57%). Classic DMARDs (86.3%) and corticosteroids (61%) were the most frequent RT. CDR was developed in 6 patients (11.7%), exhibiting both positive Strout and PCR. Symptomatic reactivation of CD (fever, asthenia, arthralgias, myalgias) occurred in two patients who had previously been diagnosed with it. Regardless of the different RT, all patients who experienced CDR had previously received more than ≥ 20 mg/day of prednisone equivalent. Despite immunosuppression, patients with CDR exhibited increased levels of specific anti-T. cruzi and anti-SAPA antibodies, which decreased after anti-parasitic treatment. CDR is possible in rheumatologic patients, especially after receiving high doses of corticosteroids. Since CDR symptoms may mimic rheumatic disease activity, monitoring of Chagas disease is highly recommended before, during and after immunosuppression.

Key Points

• Chagas disease reactivation (CDR) in the context of rheumatological treatment was associated to high doses of corticosteroids.

• CDR was associated with an increase in anti-T. cruzi antibodies despite the immunosuppressive treatment.

• Suspecting and anticipating CDR is mandatory in this patient population to diagnose and treat it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable

References

  1. Bern C (2018) Chagas disease. N Engl J Med 31(12):30–33

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rassi A, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA (2010) Chagas disease. Lancet 375(9723):1388–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marli A, Sartori C, Neto JE, Nunes EV, Maria L, Braz A et al (2002) Trypanosoma cruzi parasitemia in chronic Chagas disease: comparison between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–positive and HIV-negative patients. J Infect Dis 186(6):872–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gray EB, La Hoz RM, Green JS, Vikram HR, Benedict T, Rivera H et al (2018) Reactivation of Chagas disease among heart transplant recipients in the United States, 2012-2016. Transpl Infect Dis 20(6):0–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salvador F, Sánchez-Montalvá A, Valerio L, Serre N, Roure S, Treviño B, Pou D, Sulleiro E, Bocanegra C, Molina I (2015) Immunosuppression and Chagas disease; experience from a non-endemic country. Clin Microbiol Infect 21(9):854–860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pinazo MJ, Espinosa G, Cortes-Lletget C, de Posada EJ, Aldasoro E, Oliveira I, et al. Immunosuppression and Chagas disease: a management challenge. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(1).

  7. Lattes R, Lasala MB (2014) Chagas disease in the immunosuppressed patient. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:300–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perez CJ, Lymbery AJ, Thompson RCA (2015) Reactivation of Chagas disease: implications for global health. Trends Parasitol 31(11):595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartalesi F, Scirè CA, Requena-Méndez A, Abad MA, Buonfrate D, Caporali R et al (2017) Recommendations for infectious disease screening in migrants to Western Europe with inflammatory arthropathies before starting biologic agents. Results from a multidisciplinary task force of four European societies (SIR, SER, SIMET, SEMTSI) facing the lar. Clin Exp Rheumatol 35(5):752–765

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan American Health Organization. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Chagas disease, 2019. http://iris.paho.org. (Accessed June 2020)

  11. Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, Bern C, Bolger AF, Echeverría LE, et al. (2018) Chagas cardiomyopathy: an update of current clinical knowledge and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Vol. 138, Circulation

  12. D’Ávila DA, Galvão LMC, Sousa GR, Britto C, Moreira OC, Chiari E (2018) Monitoring the parasite load in chronic Chagas disease patients: comparison between blood culture and quantitative real time PCR. PLoS One 13(11):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buscaglia C et al (1999) Tandem amino acid repeats from Trypanosoma cruzi Shed antigens increase the half-life of proteins in blood. Blood 93:2025–2032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Affranchino JL, Ibañez CF, Luquetti AO, Rassi A, Reyes MB, Macina RA, Åslund L, Pettersson U, Frasch ACC (1989) Identification of a Trypanosoma cruzi antigen that is shed during the acute phase of Chagas’ disease. Mol Biochem Parasitol 34(3):221–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Russomando G, Sánchez Z, Meza G, de Guillen Y (2010) Implementation and evaluation of a locally sustainable system of prenatal diagnosis to detect cases of congenital Chagas disease in endemic areas of Paraguay. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 10(6):705–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Russomando G et al (2015) Diagnosis of congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection: a serologic test using shed acute phase antigen (SAPA) in mother-child binomial samples. Acta Trop 147:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noazin S, Lee JA, Malaga ES, Valencia Ayala E, Condori BJ, Roca C, Lescano AG, Bern C, Castillo W, Mayta H, Menduiña MC, Verastegui MR, Tinajeros F, Gilman RH, Chagas Working Group in Bolivia and Peru, Miranda-Schaeubinger M, Chakravarti I, Ferriss EL, Chavez C, Velarde JK, Urquizu F, Gorena M, Bowman N, Hinojosa E (2019) Trypomastigote excretory secretory antigen (TESA) blot is associated in neonates with parasite load and detects congenital T. cruzi infection using anti-SAPA IgM. J Infect Dis 219(4):609–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jordán R, Valledor A (2014) Guías de recomendaciones de prevención de infecciones en pacientes que reciben modificadores de la respuesta biológica. Rev Argentina Re 25(2):08–26

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson Y, Vieira D, Pula DM, Finckh A, Chizzolini C, Chappuis F (2018) Chagas disease and systemic autoimmune diseases among Bolivian patients in Switzerland. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 113(4):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rassi A, Amato Neto V, de Siqueira AF, Doles J, Leite MSB, Silva OQ et al (2005) Influência de corticóide, na doença de Chagas crônica, administrado em virtude de afecções associadas. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 30(2):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pinazo MJ, Espinosa G, Gállego M, López-Chejade PL, Urbina JA, Gascón J (2010) Case report: successful treatment with posaconazole of a patient with chronic Chagas disease and systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82(4):583–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dos Santos-Neto LL, Polcheira MF, Castro C, Corrêa Lima RA, Kozak Simaan C, Corrêa-Lima FA (2003) Alta parasitemia pelo Trypanosoma cruzi em paciente com lupus eritematoso sistêmico. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 36(5):613–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burgos LG, Ortiz BDM, Canese A, Ojeda A, Melo M (2012) Reactivation of chagas disease by immunosuppressive therapy in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: Report of an exceptional case. Am J Dermatopathol 34(6):84–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pérez AR, Fontanella GH, Nocito AL, Revelli S, Bottasso OA (2009) Short treatment with the tumour necrosis factor-α blocker infliximab diminishes chronic chagasic myocarditis in rats without evidence of Trypanosoma cruzi reactivation. Clin Exp Immunol 157(2):291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bilate AMB, Salemi VM, Ramires FJ, de Brito T, Russo M, Fonseca SG, Faé KC, Martins DG, Silva AM, Mady C, Kalil J, Cunha-Neto E (2007) TNF blockade aggravates experimental chronic Chagas disease cardiomyopathy. Microbes Infect 9(9):1104–1113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vacas AS, Gomez-Santana LV, Torre AC, Galimberti RL (2017) Reactivation of Chagas-Mazza disease during treatment with infliximab. An Bras Dermatol 92(6):899–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Navarrete-dechent C (2015) Use of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF α) antagonists in a patient with psoriasis and Chagas disease. An Bras Dermatol 90:171–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sánchez G et al (2019) Reactivation of Chagas disease in patients with rheumatic autoimmune diseases diagnosed by molecular quantification techniques. J Clin Rheumatol 1:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  29. Morillo et al (2015) Randomised trial of benznidazole for chronic Chagas’ cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 373:1295–1306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Milagros Zafra, Telma Gambande (Microbiology, Hospital Provincial del Centenario), Camila Bulfoni Balbi (IDICER) and Patricia Sciarrata (Central Laboratory, Rosario National University Faculty of Biochemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) for the technical and laboratorial help, Dr. Juan Beloscar (Cardiology Department of Hospital Centenario) for Chagas disease patients’ recruitment help and Wiener Lab for the donation of SAPA antigens for ELISA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ariana Ringer or Ana Rosa Pérez.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Ethics approval

The research protocol was approved by Institutional Bioethical Boards, and the study was conducted in line with the Declaration of Helsinki’s standards (Resolutions n° 681/2018, 704/2018, 2854/2008).

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ringer, A., Ruffino, J., Leiva, R. et al. Chagas disease reactivation in rheumatologic patients: association with immunosuppressive therapy and humoral response. Clin Rheumatol 40, 2955–2963 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05581-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05581-2

Keywords

Navigation