Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalent vertebral fractures incur high risk of future fractures in inflammatory myositis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess accrual of new vertebral fractures (VF) in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) over a period of time.

Methods

Hundred patients who were previously enrolled for a cross-sectional study on prevalence of asymptomatic VF were telephonically requested to review with repeat spinal radiographs and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) after 3 years. Radiographs were scored using Genant’s semi-quantitative technique. Disease activity and damage were assessed by myositis damage index (MDI) extent of damage and modified MDI for which the osteoporotic fracture item in MDI was removed. VF progressors were compared with non-progressors.

Results

Of 31 patients reviewed, 11 had dermatomyositis, 8 polymyositis, and 6 each overlap and anti-synthetase syndrome. Eighteen patients underwent DEXA scan. Seventeen had VF at baseline. At 91.62 patient years of follow-up, total number of VF increased from 27 to 51. Patients who had previous VF had higher risk of developing a new VF when compared with those with no VF (76.5% vs. 14.28%, RR: 5.35). Patients with old VF accrue fractures at a rate of 26.2 per 100 patient years. The number of fractures correlated significantly with age, T scores at the L4 level, and lower third of radius on DEXA, MDI, and modified MDI. Neither conventional nor disease-related variables differed between progressors and non-progressors.

Conclusion

Patients with IIM with a prior VF incurred a five times risk of subsequent VF irrespective of disease activity and glucocorticoids.

Key Points

Patients with inflammatory myositis are at a high risk of asymptomatic vertebral fractures.

Patients with baseline vertebral fractures incur a high risk of future fractures on follow-up.

Number of fractures is negatively correlated with age, BMD values at lower end of radius, L4, and damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available

References

  1. Marie I (2012) Morbidity and mortality in adult polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 14(3):275–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Compston J (2018) Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an update. Endocrine. 61(1):7–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. de Andrade DC, de Magalhaes Souza SC, de Carvalho JF, Takayama L, Borges CT, Aldrighi JM, Pereira RM (2012) High frequency of osteoporosis and fractures in women with dermatomyositis/polymyositis. Rheumatol Int 32(6):1549–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L, Pearson J, Cummings SR (1999) Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. J Bone Miner Res 14(5):821–828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta L, Lawrence A, Edavalath S, Misra R (2018) Prevalence and predictors of asymptomatic vertebral fractures in inflammatory myositis. Int J Rheum Dis 21(3):725–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Genant HK, Wu CY, Van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8(9):1137–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Isenberg DA, Allen E, Farewell V et al International Myositis and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) (2004) International consensus outcome measures for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Development and initial validation of myositis activity and damage indices in patients with adult onset disease. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43:49–54

  8. Vis M, Haavardsholm EA, Bøyesen P et al (2011) High incidence of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in the OSTRA cohort study: a 5-year follow-up study in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporos Int 22(9):2413–2419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McCloskey EV, Vasireddy S, Threlkeld J et al (2008) Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) with a densitometer predicts future fractures in elderly women unselected for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 23(10):1561–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. Jama. 285(3):320–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reid IR, Heap SW (1990) Determinants of vertebral mineral density in patient receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy. Arch Intern Med 150(12):2545–2548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. García-Carrasco M, Mendoza-Pinto C, de la Luz León-Vázquez M et al (2017) Incidence of vertebral fractures in women with systemic lupus erythematosus after 8 years of follow-up. Calcif Tissue Int 101(3):291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, MichaelO'Fallon W, Melton JL III (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989. J Bone Miner Res 7(2):221–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jalava T, Sarna S, Pylkkänen L et al (2003) Association between vertebral fracture and increased mortality in osteoporotic patients. J Bone Miner Res 18(7):1254–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A Basic primer on Vertebral fracture assessment: https://www.iscd.org/publications/osteoflash/a-basic-primer-on-vertebral-fracture-assessment-vfa/)

  16. Schuit SC, Van der Klift M, Weel AE et al (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone. 34(1):195–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Florez H, Hernández-Rodríguez J, Muxi A et al (2019) Trabecular bone score improves fracture risk assessment in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Rheumatology (Oxford)

  18. Mendoza-Pinto C, Rojas-Villarraga A, Molano-González N, Jiménez-Herrera EA, León-Vázquez ML, Montiel-Jarquín Á, García-Carrasco M, Cervera R (2018) Bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-regression. PLoS One 13(6):e0196113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Laroche M, Rousseau H, Mazieres B, Bonafe A, Joffre F, Arlet J (1989) Value of x-ray computed tomography in muscular pathology. Personal cases and review of the literature. Rev Rhum mal Osteo-articulaires 56(6):433–439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Department of Endocrinology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, for helping with bone mineral density assessments for these patients.

Code availability

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LG conceptualised and designed the study. LG and SG recruited the patients. Radiograph readings were done by LG and AL. Manuscript was written by SG and LG. All three reviewed the final manuscript and gave their approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Latika Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Ethics approval

Obtained

Consent to participate

Consent obtained from all subjects

Consent for publication

Consent obtained from all authors

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstracts of scientific contributions to GCOM 2019. BMC Rheumatol 3, 31 (2019)

Abstract No. P29.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganguly, S., Lawrence, A. & Gupta, L. Prevalent vertebral fractures incur high risk of future fractures in inflammatory myositis. Clin Rheumatol 40, 1431–1436 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05365-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05365-0

Keywords

Navigation