Accuracy of neutrophil CD64 expression in diagnosing infection in patients with autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis
- 51 Downloads
We aimed to systematically evaluate the accuracy of nCD64 in diagnosing infection in patients with autoimmune diseases. Studies were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Chongqing VIP databases up to October 2018. There was no restriction for language and age. Prospective studies examining the accuracy of nCD64 in diagnosing infection in patients with autoimmune diseases were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess the quality of eligible studies. Stata 15.1 and Meta-DiSc 1.4 software were used for data analysis. Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria (677 patients, 229 patients with bacterial infection, and 448 without infection). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of nCD64 were 89% (95% confidence interval (CI) 82–93) and 94% (95% CI 91–96), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 14.9 (95% CI 9.3–23.8) and 0.12 (95% CI 0.07–0.20), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 123 (95% CI 53–283) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98), respectively. The univariate meta-regression analysis showed that region, type of disease, antibiotic therapy, and presentation of nCD64 measurement results were responsible for the heterogeneity. The Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test showed that there was no publication bias (p = 0.15). nCD64 has a good overall diagnostic performance for differentiating infection from disease flare in patients with autoimmune diseases. Further studies are needed to confirm the optimized cutoff value.
KeywordsAutoimmune diseases CD64 Infection Meta-analysis Neutrophil
We thank the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University for providing research platform.
This study was funded by Health Commission of Chongqing, China (2016ZDXM010).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Wu JY, Lee SH, Shen CJ, Hsieh YC, Yo PH, Cheng HY, Chan RC, Lee CC, Chang SS (2012) Use of serum procalcitonin to detect bacterial infection in patients with autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum 64(9):3034–3042. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Song GG, Bae SC, Lee YH (2015) Diagnostic accuracies of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for bacterial infection in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 33(2):166–173Google Scholar
- 12.Matsui T, Ohsumi K, Ozawa N et al (2006) CD64 on neutrophils is a sensitive and specific marker for detection of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 33(12):2416–2424Google Scholar
- 13.Ureten K, Ertenli I, Oztürk MA (2005) Neutrophil CD64 expression in Behçet’s disease. J Rheumatol 32(5):849–852Google Scholar
- 14.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269Google Scholar
- 15.Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM, QUADAS-2 Group (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529–536. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
- 17.Li DH, Li Y, Ju J et al (2013) Neutrophil CD64 expression in rheumatoid arthritis patients complicated with infection (in chinese). Chin J Lab Med 36(1):77–79. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2013.01.019 Google Scholar
- 18.Chen FF, Zhang QY, Xing J et al (2018) Clinical value of peripheral blood neutrophil CD64 index in identifying SLE complicated with bacterial infection and active SLE. J Mod Lab Med 33(3):14–17. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2018.03.005 Google Scholar
- 19.Xu QY, Ding ZX, Zhou YL et al (2016) Usefullness of neutrophil CD64 index as a marker to differentiate between infection and disease flare in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Jiangsu Univ (Med Edn) 26(5):444–448. https://doi.org/10.13312/j.issn.1671-7783.y160132
- 20.Nishino J, Tanaka S, Kadono Y, Matsui T, Komiya A, Nishimura K, Tohma S (2010) The usefulness of neutrophil CD64 expression in the diagnosis of local infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in daily practice. J Orthop Sci 15(4):547–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1498-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Mokuda S, Doi O, Takasugi K (2012) Simultaneous quantitative analysis of the expression of CD64 and CD35 on neutrophils as markers to differentiate between bacterial and viral infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 22(5):750–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10165-011-0587-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.El-Said EE, Ali SR, El-Sheshtawy FA (2010) Neutrophil CD64 in diagnosis of infection in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Egypt J Hosp Med 41:600–617Google Scholar
- 23.Echeverri A, Naranjo-Escobar J, Posso-Osorio I, Aguirre-Valencia D, Zambrano D, Castaño GL, Martínez JD, Cañas CA, Tobón GJ (2018) Neutrophil CD64 expression, procalcitonin and presepsin are useful to differentiate infections from flares in SLE patients with SIRS. Lupus 27(7):1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203318763740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Tillinger W, Jilch R, Jilma B, Brunner H, Koeller U, Lichtenberger C, Waldhör T, Reinisch W (2009) Expression of the high-affinity IgG receptor FcRI (CD64) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a new biomarker for gastroenterologic diagnostics. Am J Gastroenterol 104(1):102–109. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2008.6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Mackay M, Oswald M, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Lichauco J, Aranow C, Kotkin S, Korsunsky I, Gregersen PK, Diamond B (2016) Molecular signatures in systemic lupus erythematosus: distinction between disease flare and infection. Lupus Sci Med 3(1):e000159. https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2016-000159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Badwey JA, Karovsky ML (1980) Active oxygen species and the functions of phagocytic leukocytes. Annu Rev Biochem 49:695–726. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.49.070180.003403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Shi SJ, Zhang J, Wu Q, Li J (2015) Diagnostic value of neutrophil CD64 for bacterial infection in patients with hematologic malignancies after chemotherapy. J Exp Hematol 23(3):852–855. https://doi.org/10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2015.03.048 Google Scholar
- 33.Dandona P, Nix D, Wilson MF, Aljada A, Love J, Assicot M, Bohuon C (1994) Procalcitonin increase after endotoxin injection in normal subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79(6):1605–1608Google Scholar