Skip to main content
Log in

The prevalence of chondrocalcinosis of the symphysis pubis on CT scan and correlation with calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPP) crystal deposition in the articular cartilage can often be seen radiographically as chondrocalcinosis (CC). CPP crystals preferentially deposit in fibrocartilages such as the knee menisci and symphysis pubis (SP). We sought to determine the prevalence of CC in the SP on computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis. This retrospective study involved readings on 1070 consecutive CTs of the abdomen and pelvis performed over 3 months in patients over 65 years of age. Medical records of 226 patients found to have CC were reviewed to determine age, gender, documentation of CPPD on problem lists or in medical histories, and whether radiology readings of the CTs mentioned CC. SP CC was identified in 21.1 % (226/1070) of consecutive CT scans with the mean age of CT+ patients being 78.6. Of the 226 patients with SP CC, the observation of CC was documented in only 5.3 % (12/226) of the radiology reports. Of the 12 instances in which the radiology reports mentioned CC, this observation was never (0/12) transmitted to the medical history or problem list. The prevalence of SP CC in patients older than 65 was 21.1 %. Since the majority of CTs of the abdomen and pelvis are not ordered for evaluation of musculoskeletal conditions, this is likely a true prevalence without selection bias. When CC of the SP was present on images, radiologists routinely overlooked or chose not to report CC. Even in the rare instances when it was reported, that information was not added to the medical history or problem list. There are several clinical situations (e.g., acute monoarthritis or atypical osteoarthritis) in which recognizing that a patient has CPP deposition would be useful. Taking the time to review images may yield clinically important findings that are not mentioned anywhere on the patient chart.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T et al (2011) EULAR recommendations for calcium pyrophosphate deposition. Part I: terminology and diagnosis. Ann Rheum Dis 70:563–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang W, Doherty M, Pascual E et al (2011) EULAR recommendations for calcium pyrophosphate deposition. Part II: management. Ann Rheum Dis 70:571–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Resnick D, Niwayama G, Goergen TG, Utsinger PD, Shapiro RF, Haselwood DH, Wiesner KB (1977) Clinical, radiographic and pathologic abnormalities in calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate deposition disease (CPPD): pseudogout. Radiology 122(1):1–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker I, Woodley SJ, Stringer MD (2010) The adult human pubic symphysis: a systematic review. J Anat 217:475–487

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Abhishek A, Doherty S, Maciewicz R et al (2012) Chondrocalcinosis is common in the absence of knee involvement. Arthritis Res Ther 14:R205, http://arthritis-research.com/content/14/5/R205

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Further reading

  1. Abreu M, Johnson K, Chung CB, De Lima Jr JE, Trudell D, Terkeltaub R, Pe S, Resnick D (2004) Calcification in calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate (CPPD) crystalline deposits in the knee: anatomic, radiographic, MR imaging, and histologic study in cadavers. Skelet Radiol 33(7):392–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shirazaian H, Chang E, Wolfson T et al (2014) Prevalence of sternoclavicular joint calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate crystal deposition on computed tomography. Clin Imaging 38:380–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramonda R, Musacchio E, Perissinotto E et al (2009) Prevalence of chondrocalcinosis in Italian subjects from Northeastern Italy. The Pro.V.A (PROgetto Veneto Anziani) study. Clin Exp Rheumatol Online 27:981–984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miksanek J, Rosenthal A (2015) Imaging of calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Curr Rheumatol Rep 17:20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryu K, Iriuchishima T, Oshida M et al (2014) The prevalence of and factors related to calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition in the knee joint. Osteoarthr Cartil 22:975–979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kenzaka T, Wakabayashi T, Morita Y (2013) Acute crystal deposition arthritis of the pubic symphysis. BMJ Case Rep 2013. Published online: 16, April

  7. McCarty DJ (1976) Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease—1975. [Review] [62 refs]. Arthritis Rheum 19:suppl-85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Sergey Tarima for his assistance with the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trusha Patel.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, T., Ryan, L., Dubois, M. et al. The prevalence of chondrocalcinosis of the symphysis pubis on CT scan and correlation with calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease. Clin Rheumatol 35, 771–773 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-016-3193-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-016-3193-1

Keywords

Navigation