Skip to main content


Log in

Consensus opinion of a North American Working Group regarding the classification of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript


The objectives of this study were to develop a standard classification of digital ulcers (DUs) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) for use in observational or therapeutic studies and to assess the reliability of these definitions as well as of the measurement of ulcer area. Ten North American rheumatologists with expertise in SSc reviewed multiple photos of DUs, examined four SSc subjects with DUs, and came to a consensus on the definitions for digital, active, healed, and indeterminate ulcers. These ten raters then examined the right hand of ten SSc subjects twice and the left hand once to classify ulcers and to measure ulcer area. Weighted and Fleiss kappa were used to calculate intra- and interrater agreement on classification of ulcers, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess agreement on ulcer area. Because the traditional ICC calculations relied on a small number of ulcers, ICCs were recalculated using the results of linear mixed models to evaluate the variance components of observations on all the data. Intrarater kappa for classifying DU as not an ulcer/healed ulcer versus active/indeterminate ulcer was substantial (0.76), and interrater kappa was moderate (0.53). The ICC for ulcer area using the linear mixed models was moderate both for intrarater (0.57) and interrater (0.48) measurements. A consensus for the classification of DUs in SSc was developed, and after a training session, rheumatologists with expertise in SSc are able to reliably classify DUs and to measure ulcer area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Chung L, Fiorentino D (2006) Digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev 5:125–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr (1997) The value of the Health Assessment Questionnaire and special patient-generated scales to demonstrate change in systemic sclerosis patients over time. Arthritis Rheum 40:1984–1991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Malcarne VL, Hansdottir I, McKinney A, Upchurch R, Greenbergs HL, Henstorf GH et al (2007) Medical signs and symptoms associated with disability, pain, and psychosocial adjustment in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 34:359–367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matucci-Cerinic M, Denton CP, Furst DE, Mayes MD, Hsu VM, Carpentier P et al (2011) Bosentan treatment of digital ulcers related to systemic sclerosis: results from the RAPIDS-2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 70:32–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Korn JH, Mayes M, Matucci Cerinic M, Rainisio M, Pope J, Hachulla E et al (2004) Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: prevention by treatment with bosentan, an oral endothelin receptor antagonist. Arthritis Rheum 50:3985–3993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abou-Raya A, Abou-Raya S, Helmii M (2008) Statins: potentially useful in therapy of systemic sclerosis-related Raynaud’s phenomenon and digital ulcers. J Rheumatol 35:1801–1808

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrick AL, Roberts C, Tracey A, Silman A, Anderson M, Goodfield M et al (2009) Lack of agreement between rheumatologists in defining digital ulceration in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 60:878–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shenoy PD, Kumar S, Jha LK, Choudhary SK, Singh U, Misra R et al (2010) Efficacy of tadalafil in secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon resistant to vasodilator therapy: a double-blind randomized cross-over trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49:2420–2428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The Scleroderma Society of Ontario granted $20,000.00 for this study.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest with regard to the contents of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murray Baron.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.


(DOC 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baron, M., Chung, L., Gyger, G. et al. Consensus opinion of a North American Working Group regarding the classification of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 33, 207–214 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: